User talk:Belagaile

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Belagaile (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

80.58.205.99 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

This IP address has been blocked because it is believed to be an open proxy or zombie computer. To prevent abuse, editing from these proxies is currently prohibited. If your ISP has misconfigured their proxy, you can try bypassing it by logging into Wikimedia's secure gateway at https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/. For more information about open proxies and what you can do, please see the WikiProject on open proxies. (Multi-RBL lookup • Sandbox test edit)

Blocking administrator: Ryulong (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: reason — you appear to be usung an open proxy -it is not permited to edit Wikipedia via a proxy Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Belagaile, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:21, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of romantic novelists

Hi Belagaile. Thanks for taking the initiative to add dates to the List of romantic novelists! I've been meaning to do that and appreciate the help. However, we may need to change the format for the dates. Per WP:Date#Dates_of_birth_and_death, dates should be in the format 1 January, 2007 and not 2007/01/20. Single years are also not supposed to be linked, just full years. I noticed that the List of authors page just uses years, not months and days, so if you'd rather do that, that would be fine too. Thanks! Karanacs 21:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Per [[WP:DATE}], if you want to keep in the month and date (which is fine), please use 1 January or January 11, 2007. That way the dates will change for users based on their preferences. If you put a date like 1900/05/06 people won't know whether you mean May 6th or June 5th. Thanks! Karanacs 14:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I had to revert your changes to the Cs. Your version deleted at least half a dozen names that were in the list before. Karanacs 14:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Samantha Carter is a real romance author, but the link was pointing to the wrong article. When you notice someone like that, just put (author) after their name. That may leave a red link, but it lets us know that we need to create an article about that person. Karanacs 14:30, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:The Pan Book of Charm.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The Pan Book of Charm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:I Reach For the Stars An Autobiography.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:I Reach For the Stars An Autobiography.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:We Danced all Night.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:We Danced all Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Naming

Please read over the naming guidelines. You've made a lot of edits lately to romance authors that conflict with this guideline. An example of this would be Diana Palmer (author). Per naming conventions the name of the article should be what "the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize." Basically if the article is at Diana Palmer then the article should start out saying 'diana palmer blah blah blah born as suchandsuch'. A good way to recognize what is the most recognized name is to look at the authors official website.. in the case of Diana Palmer her website is dianapalmer.com. I know a lot of these authors use pen names and for that the guideline is "If people published under one or more pen names and/or their own name, the best known of these names is chosen." Basically please read over naming conventions before changing all of these authors. Thanks and I hope this helps you with your editing. --ImmortalGoddezz 00:58, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And by 'an example of this' I mean that somebody went back and changed the main name to a lesser known name, not that it was you specifically that did so. --ImmortalGoddezz 01:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the late reply. The name is not lost if you mention pseudonyms later in the article; however referring to the author by a lesser known name at the beginning of an article causes a great amount of confusion, especially if that name is obscure. Take for example the article Jenna Black; right now she writes under Jenna Black; however she has written under the pen name Jennifer Barlow. The article started off referring to her as Jennifer Barlow despite the fact that the article's name is Jenna Black. You do this to avoid confusion because most people don't realize that some of these people have more than one pen name, so you stick with the one that they're commonly known as and stay with that throughout the entire article. What I mean is that most people don't know that Eleanor Marie Robertson Smith Wilder is Nora Roberts because she doesn't write under that name, she hasn't published under that name, and she rarely refers to herself by that name when interviewing. It's ok to mention it later in the article, because it is her birth/married names however per WP:NAME "Names of Wikipedia articles should be optimized for readers over editors; and for a general audience over specialists." The whole gist of my comment can be boiled down to: Just because you might be familiar with their given name/lesser known pen names doesn't mean that everybody else is. --ImmortalGoddezz 17:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of romantic novelists

Hi Belagail. I haven't visited the List of romantic novelists in a while, and I was quite surprised at the new format. You might want to look over the guidelines for formatting lists before making any further changes to the page. the only reason a list should have multiple columns is if that is needed for the information about one item in the list (for example, a column for the name, a column for first book released, and a column for a reference). It should not have different items in multiple columns the way it does now. The page had had complaints in the past that it had too many red links. The easiest way to fix the formatting would be to just remove all the red links from the main page and make sure they are on the talk page. We can then use the talk page as a todo list. I'm going to start making the changes, but I'd appreciate the help if you have time to fix it. Karanacs 20:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mather,Anne-Caroline.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mather,Anne-Caroline.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:41, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article Naming

Hi Belagaile. I'm not sure if you are aware, but per Wikipedia:Naming conventions, an article title should be the most common name that a person is known by, not necessarily their full legal name. I saw that you moved Rebecca Burton to Rebecca Brown Burton. That is incorrect; the article should be at the name she is most commonly known by, which is Rebecca Burton. I will fix this one, but ask that you please familiarize yourself with the policy before moving other articles. Thanks. Karanacs (talk) 15:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jaclyn Reding

Please read over WP:VUE before editing Jaclyn Reding. Foreign language sources are not preferred when adding information to an article, especially information that is contentious. Please also pay attention to the coherence of the information that you add, both times I've reverted your additions to this article because they are, for the most part, unintelligible in addition to being dubiously sourced. If you can find a reliable source for this information that is in English, note that fantastic fiction is not reliable, please add the info back. Thanks, --ImmortalGoddezz (t/c) 18:01, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images of book covers in author articles

Hi Belagaile, I saw that you reverted my changes to several romance author articles. Please note that under fair use we cannot use the image of a book cover in an article about an author unless the book cover itself is critically discussed or the book is critically discussed. This means that we can't just say, "In 1985, her first book X, was released" and include an image of the book cover. We have to go further and include critical commentary about the book. You may want to review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Image use policy. I'm going to reapply my changes; please don't revert again without discussing with me first. Thanks. Karanacs (talk) 13:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Naming policy

Belagaile, I noticed that you moved Diana Palmer (author) to Susan Kyle. Please note that under Wikipedia:Naming guidelines, the title of the page should be the most commonly used name of the person. For this author, she is most commonly known as Diana Palmer. Please also do not move existing articles solely so you can use the name as a redirect. That is considered bad practice. You can create a disambiguation page and have Name (author) and Name (something else), or you can put a WP:Hatnote at the top of the existing article to say "For the author who wrote as X, see author name here. Karanacs (talk) 13:44, 26 March 2009 (UTC) PS Please note that this is the second of two messages I left you here today.[reply]

WP:OVERLINK; redundancies; Welcome

Thanks for all your contributions. Just a few minor comments: It is not necessary to red-link names and phrases unless you plan to write an article on the redlinked subject soon or believe that the subject will likely have an article soon. Also, you do not need to repeat birth and date information several times in articles, and dates should no longer be linked at all, per WP:MOSNUM. Please look over the useful links that I have added at the top of this page, and a belated welcome to Wikipedia. It takes a little while to get used to the style, but I think Wikipedia is a great project. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CAUTION - copyvio

Belagaile, please be aware that you cannot copy and paste text from an online source into a Wikipedia article. Even if you change a few words or leave out a few words, if the bulk of the sentence is taken from another source, it cannot remain in the wikipedia article without quotation marks. This is expressly forbidden on wikipedia and could get you blocked. I noticed that several of your recent contributions have text taken directly from online sources. I'll clean up a little of this for an example for you, but you need to go through all of your other articles and make sure that they don't read very similarly to the original source. If you have questions, please let me know. Karanacs (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Nicole bibliography

I restored my edit moving the author's bibliography to an extra page. For the reason, please see Talk:Christopher Nicole. Please don't revert again, if you insist that the entire bibliography needs to be in the main article we can discuss that on the article's talk page. --Schuhpuppe (talk) 16:47, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

nationality and grammar

If you make a change/correction to somebody's nationality, as you did here, please make sure that the preceding article agrees with the new nationality, e.g. "an English", "a British". This is a very common error, and it is very noticeable because it's usually in the first sentence of the article. Thanks! --Joel7687 (talk) 06:51, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Belagaile. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Belagaile. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gertrudis Gómez de Avellaneda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque Country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manuel Blanco Romasanta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm Auric. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Lupe Fuentes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Auric talk 22:08, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Belagaile. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hazel Adair (novelist)

The article Hazel Adair (novelist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of meeting notability guidelines. Only reference is a directory entry and not WP:significant coverage. Google searches not finding anything that might indicate they could meet WP:AUTHOR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:23, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diana Morgan (novelist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diana Morgan (novelist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Morgan (novelist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Less Unless (talk) 21:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited R. Allatini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Austrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daphne Clair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:16, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"El Buen Viajero" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect El Buen Viajero. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 1#El Buen Viajero until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Vassallo

Please note I have reverted your 07:42, 18 May 2021‎ edit as it is not uupported by the article. Consider this a "controversial move" which means that if you want it moved to your preferred spelling you should bring it up for discussion at the Controversil Moves forum. Note, however, that none of the article cites support your preferred spelling and I also noticed that no new cites had been added that support your edit. Regards, Mercy11 (talk) 04:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

You are making a lot of undiscussed page-moves, without bothering to give any kind of reason. I suggest you stop this now. It is disruptive. DuncanHill (talk) 18:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Daphne du Maurier into Angela du Maurier. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 12:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind in the future.--Belagaile (talk) 13:25, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juan Nicolás Böhl de Faber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]