User talk:Belltown9

File permission problem with File:Ben Marks portrait against brick wall.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ben Marks portrait against brick wall.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Moehring (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stevey7788 was:

Not enough references and content.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Moehring and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Moehring, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Stevey7788 (talk) 17:41, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Moehring (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Moehring and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Moehring, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Belltown9! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:24, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Moehring (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Moehring and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Moehring, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:32, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Moehring

I added one quote and ref to Draft:John Moehring, and there's a book in at my local library that I'll take a look at tomorrow; according to Google Books, it might have content on him. If so, I'll add it to the draft. Schazjmd (talk) 00:59, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Belltown9 (talk) 01:27, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the book was a disappointment, but I'll keep looking. Schazjmd (talk) 17:36, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trying. I'm afraid the problem may be that although he is a historically important rock-poster artist, because he was in Seattle he did not get the publication attention that the guys in San Francisco did. The article I wrote on him for Collectors Weekly, ^[1], based on hours of interviews with him, may be the most definitive published work. I would be happy to add more from it in a subsequent edit, if that would help. Belltown9 (talk) 04:59, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you're right. I've requested Electrical banana: masters of psychedelic art through inter-library loan to see if he's in that one, but it will probably take several weeks for it to come in. Adding more from the interview won't help with WP:Notability, which is the issue at this point. Schazjmd (talk) 13:49, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/seattles-trippiest-rock-poster-artist-tells-all/

I have that book at work and wrote about it here: ^[1] Will check it on Monday to see if there are any references to him. Tx. Belltown9 (talk) 15:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Just traded emails with "Electric Banana" author Norman Hathaway, asking if John is in his book. Here is what he said: "No, sadly he’s not. I have great admiration for him as a designer and as a person. Art Chantry has written about him on Facebook a few times, but not sure if that’s helpful. Only published piece I’m aware of is Scott’s book." Scott's book is already cited as a reference. I'll keep looking.... Belltown9 (talk) 16:03, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, darn...sorry I couldn't be of more help. I'll keep looking as well. Schazjmd (talk) 16:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the page numbers of Moehring images in Art of Rock and Split Fountain Hieroglyphics, and made both books references. Still looking for more sources. Belltown9 (talk) 20:08, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Moehring (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the online sources appear to be WP:RELIABLE. I don't find WP:SIGCOV of the subject in the cited books.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Moehring and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Moehring, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 22:49, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Moehring (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still way too many unreliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Moehring and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Moehring, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chuck Sperry has been accepted

Chuck Sperry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:50, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Thanks for your work on the now published Chuck Sperry page

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:52, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Moehring and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Moehring, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

1292simon (talk) 11:35, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Moehring

Hello, Belltown9. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "John Moehring".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^ https://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/the-sources-of-psychedelic-art/

[1] ttps://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/seattles-trippiest-rock-poster-artist-tells-all/

[2] ttps://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/the-sources-of-psychedelic-art/

[1]

[1]