Jump to content

User talk:Blanchardb: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 69.153.248.30 to last version by Xenocidic (using Huggle)
→‎Guess what: new section
Line 194: Line 194:
:I'll make an entry for it at [[WP:PNT]] for confirmation that it is indeed an attack page. It talks about [[Howard Webb]], whose page has been subjected to heavy IP vandalism lately. --Blanchardb-<small><sup>[[User:Blanchardb|<span style="color:#808040">Me</span>]]•[[User Talk:Blanchardb|<span style="color:#408080">MyEars</span>]]•[[Special:Contributions/Blanchardb|<span style="color:804080">MyMouth</span>]]</sup></small>-timed 15:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
:I'll make an entry for it at [[WP:PNT]] for confirmation that it is indeed an attack page. It talks about [[Howard Webb]], whose page has been subjected to heavy IP vandalism lately. --Blanchardb-<small><sup>[[User:Blanchardb|<span style="color:#808040">Me</span>]]•[[User Talk:Blanchardb|<span style="color:#408080">MyEars</span>]]•[[Special:Contributions/Blanchardb|<span style="color:804080">MyMouth</span>]]</sup></small>-timed 15:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
::Thanks. I undid your entry because I found an online polish>english translator that, while shaky, showed me enough of what I needed to know. Deleted and redirected to [[Howard Webb]]. keep up the good work. [[User:Xenocidic|xenocidic]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|talk]]) 15:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
::Thanks. I undid your entry because I found an online polish>english translator that, while shaky, showed me enough of what I needed to know. Deleted and redirected to [[Howard Webb]]. keep up the good work. [[User:Xenocidic|xenocidic]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|talk]]) 15:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

== Guess what ==

You're a cunt

Revision as of 17:09, 13 June 2008

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter


Bigjkim

What? i merely want to open discussion. btw you should get a life instead of spending all day on wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigjkim (talkcontribs) 02:07, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huggy Wuggy

I am sorry, I don't understand. Come again? Smuckers (talk) 13:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow you were quick, give me chance I was in the middle of adding the notice to their userpage after I nominated Six Sigma IT inc. for speedy deletion! I have therefore amended it. Have fun! ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 00:35, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for correcting the DB I placed on the article about Shared price fluctuation?. I am a relatively new editor to WP -- I am just getting more seriously involved -- and I appreciate your input in helping my work here. Be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 14:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Thanks for the advice! Ecoleetage (talk) 14:10, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Format fix of the latest Christianity newsletter

Hello, Blanchardb. You have new messages at Cashier12's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Why can't i delete: Cwmpennar?

I decided to delete the page mainly because i thought it was abit short and dosen't supply enough information. Please talk back.

Hello, Blanchardb. You have new messages at Tinucherian's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

i dont understand why my comment was removed

"Furthermore the Trinity doctrine can be perceived to be a contradiction in terms; some believe that the commandment 'I am the Lord the Lord is one' directly contradicts with the idea of a trinity, in that G-D cannot be three things if G-D truly is One."

why was it removed?

hoffbrandm Hoffbrandm (talk) 17:41, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- how do you mean my use of the term G-D betrays my intention, i refuse to write it the way you do, if it is an issue then change that particular part, however i refuse to do it myself. that is not an issue, you seem to find some in it.

- fair enough i wont disagree with the want of a purely descriptive sentence page

- this is however a critical argument against the concept, it is evident therefore that there should be some place for it in wikipedia where might this be if not in the description of it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoffbrandm (talkcontribs) 18:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RCA (trademark)

Why did you make the redirect to the defunct RCA Corporation? I suggest you join the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard concerning unwanted changes to the RCA Corporation article which led to the creation of the RCA (trademark) article. Steelbeard1 (talk) 23:47, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Anderson Biro, LLC

Nice! I like your style.

I just was not sure if you were allowed to reinstate the tag if its removal was clearly not legitimate. J.delanoygabsadds 13:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my userpage!--Startstop123 (talk) 19:41, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assume good will

Did you even read the article?FX (talk) 02:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, so that buys 5 days of discussion?

Is that what you mean? Clever.

Does this mean you don't know where to discuss it either? or are you just wise beyond your years ...

<grin>

FX (talk) 02:07, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fake pages

I don't think that they are hurting anything, are they? They are just for my secret page challenge. I don't think any other people will be looking at them. Can we keep them or change them some more, or what?Mattkenn3 talk 02:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Please recreate them, but give them a name that beging with User:Mattkenn3/ (you forgot the User: part). --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 02:14, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Made it a redirect

How is that? Or are main page articles not allowed to go to wikipedia pages?FX (talk) 03:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?

I didn't create the well article, I just made a redirect to it. But thanks for the praise, even though I don't deserve it. FX (talk) 03:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baek Ji Young discography

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Baek Ji Young discography, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 22:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's quite alright. I appreciate you letting me know though. I just moved the whole lot from the Baek Ji Young article itself. Delete away! Regards, --Soetermans (talk) 06:38, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lionel Pérez

Hello. I don't understand what you've just done regarding my edits to the page Lionel Pérez. I rearranged the information, and requested a citation for a potentially libellous statement present in the article. You then undid it, and left a message on my talk page regarding potentially libellous content, leaving the contentious content in the article untagged. What's the point in that? Dancarney (talk) 15:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle

No problem, this is a new alternate account I set up for vandalism reversion, and isn't on the whitelist yet (less than 500 edits) so I imagine this sort of thing will continue, I'll probably get reported to AIV a few times by different users, but no worries. Cheers, EJF (huggle) (talk) 21:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you nominated the above article for deletion here. There has been some work on the article in the meantime if you would like to take another look at it. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 00:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Award

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I hereby award you the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your efforts to revert those vandals. Keep up the good work! SchfiftyThree 02:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to delete the page but there's no applicable speedy criteria. Can you give me a brief translation (ideally on the page in question so we can delete the translation along with the foreign text) so I can confirm it's an attack page? xenocidic (talk) 15:18, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll make an entry for it at WP:PNT for confirmation that it is indeed an attack page. It talks about Howard Webb, whose page has been subjected to heavy IP vandalism lately. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 15:22, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I undid your entry because I found an online polish>english translator that, while shaky, showed me enough of what I needed to know. Deleted and redirected to Howard Webb. keep up the good work. xenocidic (talk) 15:31, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guess what

You're a cunt