User talk:BlooWilt

Speedy deletion notices

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles. If you continue to remove them, you will be bloc k ed from editing Wikipedia. hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 18:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stop? I've only done it once. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BlooWilt (talk • contribs) 11:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Ewlyahoocom/WikiPorn

I agree with you, the user page Ewlyahoocom/WikiPorn should be deleted. Kingstonjr's "work gallery" should also be deleted, and the links to other user pages from Kingstonjr's UP should be checked out and likely deleted. Beatdown 17:53, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm-kay. Think you should tell him it will be deleted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BlooWilt (talk • contribs) 15:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, BlooWilt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Ewlyahoocom 17:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And you're greeting me even after I said your porn folder should be deleted? And don't greet me, I've been a user for like 2 months. --BlooWilt 17:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can say whatever you want -- it's Wikipedia. As only the 3rd or 4th person to post a message to your user page a greeting is still permissible and, in any case, it would be rude not to greet you, would it not? Ewlyahoocom 19:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(ignore my porn comment) It's okay not to greet me. (well, at least now it isn't) I have everything under control. K THX. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BlooWilt (talk • contribs) 11:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

B (letter only)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page [[:B (letter only)]]. Your test worked, and has been or will soon be removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Alan 18:12, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bla bla bla. I have deja veu. Copy cat. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BlooWilt (talk • contribs) 11:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geni 18:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. It's getting boring. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BlooWilt (talk • contribs) 11:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

One question. How did you know that B (letter only) even existed? --BlooWilt 23:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seasoned Wikipedians have strange magical powers. 210.50.222.88 00:58, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Believed. Say, aren't you the first vandalizer of Domthedude001's vandalism page? If you are, he used you as the hint for his 4th easter egg.

Huh?

I went on to wikipedia and it said I had new messages. I clicked but there weren't any. --BlooWilt 22:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Picture Size

Hi, BlooWilt. I noticed on your userpage that you say you don't know how to change the size of a picture. I'll write an example of how to do it: If you wanted Image:Example.jpg to be 150 pixels, you would write Image:Example.jpg|150px. I hope this helps. Red Alien War is Over! 02:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll do it right now.

AfD nomination of Don't Stay

An editor has nominated Don't Stay, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreword (Linkin Park song) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 20:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why? It's in the "other songs" section. --BlooWilt 00:26, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Easier to Run

An editor has nominated Easier to Run, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foreword (Linkin Park song) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 20:41, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questions:

1. Why deletion? 2. Why does this look like the one for Don't Stay?

Please answer these. I'm begging you. Talk at'cha later, BlooWilt 00:28, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Figure.09

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, BlooWilt! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bnewgrounds\.com\b, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 00:36, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't spam. It's the truth. Get it through your head, kid. --BlooWilt 00:37, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It just happened again

the thing that happened Here.

Non-free use disputed for Image:BodyMovinSingle.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BodyMovinSingle.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Talk at'cha later, BetacommandBot 01:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I took the image but the thing I took a photo of was not made by me. So I sort of made it.

BlooWilt 20:57, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I know I shouldn't vandalize other peoples posts but I just wanted the bots to sound more funny.

Image copyright problem with Image:Mix_master_mike.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mix_master_mike.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tnlf.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Tnlf.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missing copyright tag? Not no more! --BlooWilt on the wikiprowl, later! 21:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Egg9

A tag has been placed on Egg9, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andante1980 15:06, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No please! Don't delete it, I'll move it! I forgot to subpage! --BlooWilt on the wikiprowl, later! 15:10, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User categories

Hello. Just so you know, we don't create categories for grouping the pages of individual users. I've cleaned these up for you. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 16:08, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that I see what you are trying to do. You can see all of your pages together here. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 16:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um... good enough. I can live with that. --BlooWilt on the wikiprowl, later! 17:41, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bonus Batter

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Bonus Batter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Rambutan (talk) 14:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why? --BlooWilt on the wikiprowl, later! 14:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Bonus Batter

Bonus Batter, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Bonus Batter satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonus Batter and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Bonus Batter during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rambutan (talk) 14:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see nothing on the "Wikipedia is not" list that's in this article so why is it being deleted? --BlooWilt on the wikiprowl, later! 22:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Batter-thing

You are expected to explain your removal of PROD templates!--Rambutan (talk) 14:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonus Batter

A tag has been placed on Bonus Batter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Bonus Batter is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Bonus Batter saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Melsaran (talk) 14:41, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the result was keep so it's being kept! --BlooWilt on the wikiprowl, later! 22:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Booty

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Professor Booty, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.suprari.com/wiki.php?page=Check_Your_Head. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 01:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George Bernier (physician)

A tag has been placed on George Bernier (physician), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Cheers, CP 19:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like Inu Yasha for discussion

A category created by you or to which you have significantly contributed is being considered for deletion, rename, move or merge in accordance with Wikipedia's Categories for Discussion policies . This does not mean that any of the articles in the category will be deleted. They may, however, be recategorized.
Please share your thoughts on the matter at this category's entry on the Categories for discussion page.

Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know that I have moved Category:Wikipedians who like Inu Yasha to Category:Wikipedians who like InuYasha, per the nomination at WP:UCFD. —Zachary ^talk 22:52, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello myself!

Hi there BlooWilt, I'm your at school self, BorWort! I'm new as a user but uh, talk to me when you can, bye. --BorWort 16:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BorWort. See you later. --BlooWilt on the wikiprowl, later! 20:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stereophonic Sometimes

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Stereophonic Sometimes, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://uk.music.yahoo.com/release/27187949. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 21:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beastie Boys song articles

Thanks for your contributions to Beastie Boys information. I'm noticing a few separate articles are being created for album tracks that were not singles. This doesn't seem like a good idea because they will probably never grow beyond stub status, and as article topics they lack notability beyond the albums they come from. Would it be okay if I merged these back to their album pages? Generally a single rich album page beats a number of song stubs.

On a related matter, the long quote from The Sounds Of Science on Something's Got to Give (song) is probably WP:COPYVIO. This should be trimmed deeply, and credited. {{Cite album-notes}} is helpful for that. / edg ☺ ★ 11:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bbrc.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bbrc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boom

Why did you redirect the Boom! (song) to the Steal this album article. The song has enough merit on its own to warrant an article. I undid your edit for the time being. Please explain why this edit was done before doing this again. If you feel this article should not exist, then please bring this topic up for discussion in the articles talk page. Thank you. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying one by one to get the other 3 SOAD albums to only link to the songs that are singles. However, if you really think it should stay, then we could probably do so with some of the songs on Mezmerize and Hypnotize. BlooWilt on the wikiprowl, later! (talk) 23:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both great albums. I would have no problem with that. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 23:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kay. BlooWilt on the wikiprowl, later! (talk) 23:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Drinkin' Wine

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Drinkin' Wine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Drinkin' Wine. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 03:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BodyMovinSingle.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:BodyMovinSingle.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rickys theme music video.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rickys theme music video.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude how old are you?

You're really really intensely funny!!Irish♥forever^{(and lovin' it)} 22:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Shambala (Beastie Boys song)

I have nominated Shambala (Beastie Boys song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shambala (Beastie Boys song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ~~Juvenile Deletionist~~ 19:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Believe Me (Beastie Boys song)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Believe Me (Beastie Boys song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Pointless article. There is no info on this article that can't already be learned on Agilo E Olio.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. KMFDM FAN (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Stereophonic Sometimes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Stereophonic Sometimes.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:BeastieBoysElectricWorm.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:BeastieBoysElectricWorm.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Professor Booty

The article Professor Booty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 18:39, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark on the Bus

The article Mark on the Bus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 11:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Now Get Busy

The article Now Get Busy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pretzel Nugget for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pretzel Nugget is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pretzel Nugget until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 13:15, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pretzelnugget.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pretzelnugget.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]