User talk:Bong009

July 2014

Hello, I'm Ebyabe. An edit that you recently made to Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Welfare State ‖ 17:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:54, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:11, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Apparently your block did not result in you considering changing your behavior. Oh well... --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Inspector General ‖ 00:50, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 01:00, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Terrio]], from a story by Snyder and [[David S. Goyer]]. The cast includes [[Henry Cavill]] and [[Ben Affleck]<ref name="WB">{{cite web |author=[[Warner Bros.]]|url=http://www.dccomics.com/blog/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marvel

Stop putting Marvel on top for the films for 20th Century Fox. Marvel was not the lead company for the X-Men films, etc., like it was for Iron Man, The Avengers, etc. - Gothicfilm (talk) 22:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Avengers: Age of Ultron. Areaseven (talk) 00:07, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Avengers: Age of Ultron shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Areaseven (talk) 04:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm Ebyabe. An edit that you recently made to Avengers: Age of Ultron‎ seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 18:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm Ebyabe. An edit that you recently made to Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 23:30, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced Content

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Quicksilver (comics). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SuperCarnivore591 (talk) 22:11, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 21 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Jessica Jones (TV series) page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Legends of Tomorrow, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian^? 04:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Luke Cage (TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Fast 8.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:36, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Spider-Man: Homecoming and Doctor Strange (film). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Doctor Strange (film). TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:56, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bong009 reported by User:Favre1fan93 (Result: ). Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 04:48, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Production of Avengers: Infinity War.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Seriously, you've been on here far too long to keep making edits like this. I don't know what you might be looking to for examples to include these edits, or why you might think they are correct, but clearly you have know they aren't when you are constantly being reverted. If you continue to keep this up, another ANI discussion will be opened concerning you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:57, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Flash release date

"The Flash movie was not removed or canceled, still stands with the date of March 16, 2018"?! Well, read this: “Tomb Raider” is the first film dated on March 16, 2018. Speculation previously emerged that the studio was going to open its DC Comics title “The Flash” on that date, but Warners has yet to set an official date for the superhero movie." Kailash29792 (talk) 03:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Defenders (miniseries). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alex|The|Whovian^? 00:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

She may have been confirmed with the main cast, at the same time, but that doesn't mean that she will be main cast. There's plenty of occurrences where main/recurring/guest are announced at the same time. You will need a source that states that she will be main cast, else you may face a report for edit-warring for constantly adding unsourced content. Alex|The|Whovian^? 00:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're edit-warring as well at X-Men: Days of Future Past, rather than trying to seek consensus on the talk page. If you continue your pattern of violative edits and non-constructive behavior, an admin will be asked to block or ban WIkipedia editing privileges. Please: Discuss your issues on the article talk pages. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've been blocked before and that this talk page is one long string of warnings. I suspect you are, in fact, a troll making vandal edits for fun or attention. Be aware that a second block will be longer than the first.--Tenebrae (talk) 22:21, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bong009. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Draft:Avengers: Infinity War, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Per edits to MCU-related articles and drafts. Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Justice League (film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop re-ordering the cast list as per your own wish. There is already an official cast list released by WB, so we must follow that. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:The Inhumans (TV series). Kailash29792 (talk) 06:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:25, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bong009. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm Classicwiki. I noticed that you recently removed content from Carol Danvers without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 03:15, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bong009. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marvel Comics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain Marvel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:21, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Let’s talk

Yo DrChaos56 (talk) 20:03, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- /Alex/₂₁ 03:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]