User talk:Boyofjawad

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for copyright violations and promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:49, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Boyofjawad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24492 was submitted on Mar 28, 2019 09:15:52. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 09:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to alter another user's message, as you have at least twice tried to do here. As it says clearly in the block notice, if you want to appeal your block you need to add the relevant text below the block notice. You need to copy the text, paste it below the block notice, and include your reason in the copy. --David Biddulph (talk) 11:58, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken block

I have been blocked because i added awards and recognition as it is. now you think how can i change name of an award.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Boyofjawad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24531 was submitted on Mar 31, 2019 18:11:10. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:11, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boyofjawad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked because i added awards and recognition as it is. now you think how can i change name of an award? RAY (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 18:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are blocked for copyright violations and promotion; you need to address these things in your unblock request. 331dot (talk) 18:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boyofjawad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read all the articles regarding copyright violations and promotion on Wikipedia and now I understand why i was blocked from editing. I appeal reviewer to unblock my account as I would not harm any of Wikipedia policies as I understand them. RAY (talk) 19:15, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No response to below comment. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:35, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You said above that you now understand these policies. Instead of telling us that you understand them, you should demonstrate it. For example, tell us in your words what these policies say. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:06, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The very basic thing that I shouldn’t do is to not copy the content and paste it on wiki. RAY (talk) 22:23, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boyofjawad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The very basic thing that I shouldn’t do is to not copy the content and paste it on wiki. RAY (talk) 05:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This hardly covers WP:COPYRIGHT and doesn't even touch on WP:PROMO. Yamla (talk) 12:47, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Detailed Unblock Request

{{unblock | reason= Another unblock request because previously i tried to convince admin by short and sweet reason but i think he/she is not satisfied. Here I accept my fault that without reading guidelines I repeatedly copied content from other websites and posted on Wikipedia. I am now aware that any text, photo, video or audio ever posted on any website needs to have permissions to use it on other unless it is your own content. Have you satisfied admin? Now on promotion matter, it was not my mistake, i am a part time journalist and had an interview with a celebrity whose page i tried to create and not found much personal content of her on other news websites. But Wikipedia policy doesn’t allow me to do so as they don’t know whether a user is promoting or not but the article written without proper citations and reason for publishing given personal would be blocked. So that now i know what to do with it, would create content with citations from reputed and recognised media houses only. Have you satisfied admin? [[User:Boyofjawad|RAY]] ([[User talk:Boyofjawad#top|talk]]) 13:22, 18 June 2019 (UTC)}}

@Yamla: @NinjaRobotPirate:

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boyofjawad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Another unblock request because previously i tried to convince admin by short and sweet reason but i think he/she is not satisfied. Here I accept my fault that without reading guidelines I repeatedly copied content from other websites and posted on Wikipedia. I am now aware that any text, photo, video or audio ever posted on any website needs to have permissions to use it on other unless it is your own content. Have you satisfied admin? Now on promotion matter, it was not my mistake, i am a part time journalist and had an interview with a celebrity whose page i tried to create and not found much personal content of her on other news websites. But Wikipedia policy doesn’t allow me to do so as they don’t know whether a user is promoting or not but the article written without proper citations and reason for publishing given personal would be blocked. So that now i know what to do with it, would create content with citations from reputed and recognised media houses only. Have you satisfied admin? RAY (talk) 13:22, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 15:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boyofjawad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Another unblock request because previously i tried to convince admin by short and sweet reason but i think he/she is not satisfied. Here I accept my fault that without reading guidelines I repeatedly copied content from other websites and posted on Wikipedia. I am now aware that any text, photo, video or audio ever posted on any website needs to have permissions to use it on other unless it is your own content. Have you satisfied admin? Now on promotion matter, it was not my mistake, i am a part time journalist and had an interview with a celebrity whose page i tried to create and not found much personal content of her on other news websites. But Wikipedia policy doesn’t allow me to do so as they don’t know whether a user is promoting or not but the article written without proper citations and reason for publishing given personal would be blocked. So that now i know what to do with it, would create content with citations from reputed and recognised media houses only. Have you satisfied admin? RAY (talk) 10:47, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 13:31, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You may not remove declined unblock requests, per WP:BLANKING. I have restored them here. I can't help noticing that your previous request was declined with the text "You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request", and that your current request is identical to the previous one. --bonadea contributions talk 11:06, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My previous request was declined because of no response from admin. RAY (talk) 10:50, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Indeep Bakshi

Hello, Boyofjawad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Indeep Bakshi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:35, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DMICDC

Hello, Boyofjawad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DMICDC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Dom from Paris (talk) 21:38, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Sonyaa

Draft:Sonyaa, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Sonyaa and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Sonyaa during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:00, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boyofjawad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now I understand the several type of violations regarding copyright and other things and i would not create articles of low importance, kindly unblock my account. RAY (talk) 18:37, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licenced?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Draft:Sonyaa concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sonyaa, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sonyaa

Hello, Boyofjawad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sonyaa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! bonadea contributions talk 17:04, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Boyofjawad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this block is no longer necessary because I understand that writing about a person is like endorsement and and should not do that as Wikipedia is a free foundation that restricts endorsement and promotions, and also copying content from other websites is a violation of copyright policies and should not happen. RAY (talk) 10:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request does not address key questions raised in response to prior unblock requests. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please state for the record that you are refusing to answer the questions we've asked you. Be aware, this will significantly count against you. Alternatively, please remove your open unblock request and post a new one where you answer the questions. --Yamla (talk) 11:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Boyofjawad, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jalen Folf (talk) 23:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]