User talk:Carri796

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Carri796, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page List of pharaohs have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Ammarpad (talk) 18:13, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

If i get my information from this Wikipedia for example List of Pharaohs and i click on a link, like one of the names then find information there that isnt on the List of Pharaohs is that ok Please help me with...

Carri796 (talk) 18:35, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Our articles on individual pharaohs hold much more information on that pharaoh than the list could possibly hold. Huon (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ptolemy Memphitis moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Ptolemy Memphitis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 21:48, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on the list of pharaohs[edit]

Dear Carri796, thank you for your edits on the list of pharaohs. However, I wanted to gently point out that wikipedia itself cannot be used as a citation/reference to justify some fact, as this would promote circular thinking and opens the door to unverified statements. Thus, what should be done is cite the relevant source. For example, your edit pertaining to Nerikare should cite Ryholt's 1997 book on the Second Intermediate Period (cited in the article on Nerikare, so you can essentially copy the reference there and paste it in the list of pharaohs) and not cite the wikipedia article on Nerikare! Note that this article is accessible from the list since Nerikare is wikilinked to the article Nerikare. Please try to update your edits accordingly! I remain at your disposal should you need to help.Iry-Hor (talk) 18:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hedju Hor has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hedju Hor. Thanks! Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 20:38, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of vocaloid songs moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, List of vocaloid songs, does not have enough content and citations as written to remain published. Any time you have to put "This article is not complete!" in large letters, it's probably not ready for mainspace. The article needs more content and citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Schazjmd (talk) 21:39, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hedju Hor (October 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zanhe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Definitely notable if confirmed. However, the article contains no valid source, and I can't find anything on Google books.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hedju Hor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hedju Hor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zanhe (talk) 03:30, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Carri796! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Zanhe (talk) 03:30, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akikoloid-chan[edit]

Hello Carri796,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Akikoloid-chan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TomCat4680 (talk) 20:08, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Akikoloid-chan[edit]

The article Akikoloid-chan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, no significant coverage in reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Not a very active user (talk) 13:15, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Carri796. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 23:42, 28 December 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Carri796. You have new messages at TomCat4680's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your draft article, Draft:Maiko Hakaine[edit]

Hello, Carri796. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maiko Hakaine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.