User talk:Celtic0106

Image copyright problem with Image:Yupi.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Yupi.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:38, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Kole Beer

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kole Beer, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kole Beer. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 21:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC) --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 21:09, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:TGrave.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:TGrave.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howch e ng {chat} 23:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Lenny.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lenny.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Onyx Millenium (sic) Football Club

I've just noticed that you're the sole contributor to the OMFC article, aside from the {{notability}} label I added recently. I also made a few points on the talk page. Unless you can expand the article to show that it meeds Wikipedia's notability guidelines (and preferably to answer the specific queries on the talk page while you're at it), I'm inclined to nominate it for deletion. -- Smjg 16:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Namatjira

Namatjira may well have been "a great man", but adding a comment to that effect (particularly unsourced and at the very bottom of the article) goes against the encyclopedia we're attempting to create here. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 23:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ABO.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ABO.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 19:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ATruss.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ATruss.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 19:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More replaceable fair use images

—Chowbok ☠ 20:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Michael Donnelly (author)) page

Why did you delete my page? I had just created it and was writing more to it, and you deleted before I had finished!! In the future, please consult Wikipedia before you do some thing stupid! --Celtic0106 05 January 2007

Consult Wikipedia? Um, I'm an administrator here. That article did not assert notability. Please see WP:Notability for Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Thank you. --Fang Aili ^talk 03:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. Please add an assertion of notability. Thanks. --Fang Aili ^talk 04:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note that sufficient notability has not been established yet. Before you continue editing the article, you may wish to review notability guidelines (particularly WP:BIO). As it stands the article is quite speedy-able. If sufficient notability isn't established soon, it will likely be deleted again quickly. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 04:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 04:36, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've prod'd this just to give it a notability-inclusion deadline. Just a friendly reminder. Thank you, Fang Aili ^talk 22:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sustainable Living Tasmania

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Sustainable Living Tasmania, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Fang Aili ^talk 22:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JHart.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JHart.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Quentin X 13:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Celtic0106 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 01:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The case is proven, the sockpuppets are blocked, please do not do that again, or this account may also be blocked. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 22:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:SHnaka.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:SHnaka.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytny 21:38, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have several images of Celtic players you've listed as fair use, but:

you are using an outdated fair use template
you have not provided a fair use rationale for any of them, and
all the images you've uploaded appear to be replaceable, and therefore not qualify as fair use.

Please addres these issues, or they will be deleted after one week. Ytny 22:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Frankspencer.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Frankspencer.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Ytny 22:22, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Craigie Dunes

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Craigie Dunes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Orderinchaos78 06:00, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OnyxM.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:OnyxM.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Kole Beer do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Thewinchester ^(talk) 16:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Cumberworth

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Tom Cumberworth, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. ArtVandelay13 17:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tom Cumberworth

An article that you have been involved in editing, Tom Cumberworth, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Cumberworth. Thank you. ArtVandelay13 21:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:CaptJB.jpg

The file File:CaptJB.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Singenpoo

The article Singenpoo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2006

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Another Believer _(Talk) 00:40, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]