User talk:ChefBear01/Archive 1

Specific topic areas (creation and edits)

This section is for any edit or addition requests people feel I may be best suited to make.

Please see ChefBear User Page for the list of specific areas I am best suited to give input in.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Office for the Internal Market (OIM) (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Office for the Internal Market (OIM) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Office for the Internal Market (OIM), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChefBear01! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About template

Signing your posts

Howdy, ChefBear01. Would you please learn to sign your posts, correctly? GoodDay (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When outdenting. You sign you posts -

This way. GoodDay (talk) 17:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not this way.

GoodDay (talk) 17:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understand? You only outdent your post, not your name too. GoodDay (talk) 17:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you for your informing me. ChefBear01 (talk) 12:53, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruth (comic book character) (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at The Union (comics). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ruth (comic book character) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ruth (comic book character), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of The Union members

Hello, ChefBear01,

Thank you for creating List of The Union members.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This page needs more references - independent, reliable and significant coverage is needful. Thank you .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 00:30, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About template

There is a good example of the value of the about template at Pharmacy. Its purpose is to receive visitors who actually wanted to read about the shops rather than the people in them. In other words, {{about}} intercepts common alternative meanings that this article is not about "but I know an article that does". Or articles, using a disambiguation article.

The other main use is as in the case of the trade agreements article: we use it to say that this article does not give the full picture, the rest is over there.

Does that explain sufficiently? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 08:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that I am not as well versed on the templates available for use (I only know (4 - 5 templates well out of hundreds if not thousands), I will have to look up the templates wiki page and browse them to get myself up to scratch with the main templates. ChefBear01 (talk) 06

47, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

You haven't a hope! There are just too many. All you can ever really expect to do is notice their use in articles that interest you, then make a note for future use. My own user:John Maynard Friedman page is almost entirely such a collection. Feel free to raid it. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 07:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: UK - Crown Dependencies Customs Union has been accepted

UK - Crown Dependencies Customs Union, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Office for the Internal Market (OIM) (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Office for the Internal Market (OIM) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Office for the Internal Market (OIM), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChefBear01! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Specific topic areas (creation and edits)

This section is for any edit or addition requests people feel I may be best suited to make.

Please see ChefBear User Page for the list of specific areas I am best suited to give input in.

-->

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Union (Marvel Team), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Union and Paul Grist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Team U.K Summit

Hello, ChefBear01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Team U.K Summit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:31, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Union (comics)

@Kaihsu: would it be reasonable to move a redirect page onto drafts in order to move a new draft space article into its place and then tag to merge the history of the redirect page into the new page, or do admins have a process to move pages in that situation. ChefBear01 (talk) 13:45, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Office for the Internal Market has been accepted

Office for the Internal Market, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Nightenbelle (talk) 18:17, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nightenbelle:

I usually put them through the request process as some of the articles I have created in the past around this topic have not met WP:CONSENSUS.

I would rather ensure articles on this topic have WP:CONSENSUS before they are moved to WP:MAINSPACE ChefBear01 (talk) 16:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then don't put them through the process until they have consensus. I don't know what else to tell you- the page met the requirements to be moved to the mainspace. You can nominate it for deletion if you prefer.Nightenbelle (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no problem if it has been accepted article reviewer I just won’t move them myself. ChefBear01 (talk) 17:07, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate Account

I created this account when I had difficulty accessing my primary account, I have now read the wiki policy and will only use this account for security and privacy reasons such as when I edit using unsecured networks.ChefBear01 (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages and archiving

Please stop deleting talk page sections that have not been archived. The sections you deleted are not present on any subpage of the relevant talk page. Failing to do that means you are breaching the behavioural guideline WP:TPO. As per WP:TALKCOND, talk pages only really require archiving at 75 kB and above. The current ~6 kB does not need archiving. If you need guidance on how to set up talk page archiving in general, see H:ARC. Cambial — foliar❧ 22:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cambial Yellowing:

Thank you for the links to the relevant help articles, I have been archiving them is by creating a section on the talk page, creating a table with a list of months and linking back to the particular version of the page from that month.

I will review the methods of archiving and use page space as a guide instead of my current monthly archive which I used mainly to provide a guide for consistency. ChefBear01 (talk) 23:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Union (comics) (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at The Union (Marvel Team) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Union (comics) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Union (comics), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:AUKUS

Hello, ChefBear01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AUKUS, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Union state (governance)

Hello, ChefBear01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Union state".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Building a New Scotland has been accepted

Building a New Scotland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DIVINE 📪 19:18, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:British Super League (football)

Hello, ChefBear01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:British Super League (football), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:UK intergovernmental relations

Hello, ChefBear01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:UK intergovernmental relations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Union (comics)

Hello, ChefBear01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Union (comics), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:22, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Union (comics)

Hello, ChefBear01. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Union".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:17, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft space Articles

1. Draft:United Kingdom internal market
2. Draft:Male genital mutilation Please Use The Sections Below!

When you need to discuss something, Please Select the topic that fits the purpose of you visit.

Do not just add new topic sections as it makes the chat page untidy.

If the topic is not covered below then create a new topic section.

And please end your message using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

(My main space articles)

This space is for anyone who needs to discuss a main space article I have created.

1. United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020
2. Independence for Scotland Party
3. Agriculture and Trade Commission
4. UK–Australia FTA
5. United Kingdom common framework policies
6. UK-Japan Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement
7. United Kingdom–United States free trade agreement
8. Strategic Trade Advisory Group
9. Trade agreements of the United Kingdom
10. Immigration policy of the United Kingdom
11. EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement
12. The Union (comics)
13. National Timing Centre
14. United Kingdom Global Navigation Satellite System
15. UK electronic travel authorisation

My main space articles (marked for merger)

This space is for anyone who needs to discuss a main space article I have created that is marked for merger

(1) UK Electronic Travel Authorisation

Your submission at Articles for creation: UK Electronic Travel Authorisation has been accepted

UK Electronic Travel Authorisation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lopifalko (talk) 06:58, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ChefBear01 (talk) 22:33, 16 February 2020

Modifications I Have Made On Other Users Pages

This space is for anyone who needs to discuss a modification I have made on their pages ChefBear01 (talk) 23:25, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]