User talk:Delarossa

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from RichardWeiss! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here is a list of useful links that I have compiled:

Again, welcome SqueakBox 16:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Abstract Studie Uni Leiden2.pdf

Thanks for uploading Image:Abstract Studie Uni Leiden2.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:04, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Abstract.pdf

Thanks for uploading Image:Abstract.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Volcano RGB.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Volcano RGB.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Herostratus 23:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:EASY VALVE.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EASY VALVE.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Volcano Vaporizer

An article that you have been involved in editing, Volcano Vaporizer, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volcano Vaporizer. Thank you. Jreferee T/C 16:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Volcano Vaporizer

A tag has been placed on Volcano Vaporizer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pgagnon999 (talk) 16:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory to what you have said, there was only one "keep" in the AFD, and it was quite widely agreed that it should not be kept. The article, you may see, has five times been deleted. I will give you the text as it was immediately before the placement of the AFD tag (I'm going to create it as a user subpage for your user), but please know that reposting a deleted article is a violation of policy, and if you repeat it, it's a significant violation. Nyttend (talk) 16:48, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nyttend, thanks for your answer and I am looking forward for the article. I am not going to repost it, but interested in review it as I have no idea about the articles -and their advertising character- being deleted before. The article I posted last week was new and simply contained information about vaporizing temperatures of different plants and the set up of the device. Not even close to advertising. Anyway I will not repost last years deleted articles, but would stress that an article has relevance on wikipedia, as a information about a device that strives for FDA approval. Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.139.78.32 (talk) 13:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I wanted to ask again, if have you found the time to look up the original article? 
I am looking forward to review the article for personal information. 
Please reply soon.  Thank you!

Sorry; I'd completely forgotten about it. The text is here. Nyttend (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:VOLCANO.gif

Image Copyright problem

Hi Delarossa!
We thank you for uploading Image:VOLCANO.gif, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 18:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:VOLCANO DIGIT340px.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:VOLCANO DIGIT340px.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar 15:38, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parts of Valve Set 180.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Parts of Valve Set 180.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar 15:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Volcano in action.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Volcano in action.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar 15:41, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:King of vaps klein.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:King of vaps klein.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar 15:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Volcano balloon.jpg

The file File:Volcano balloon.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]