Jump to content

User talk:Djfkf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Djfkf, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 11:43, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Empis producta moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Empis producta. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BangJan1999 02:30, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Empis producta moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Empis producta, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Empis producta (October 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 11:43, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Djfkf! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:43, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Empis producta has been accepted[edit]

Empis producta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

UtherSRG (talk) 11:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm UtherSRG. An edit that you recently made to Lord Howe golden whistler seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! UtherSRG (talk) 11:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at History of Singapore, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 11:50, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Galápagos Islands xeric scrub. UtherSRG (talk) 11:58, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fernandina Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isabela. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 12:29, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Galápagos Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tortuga Island.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Endemism in the Hawaiian Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carelia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed this. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:59, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Genus and species formatting[edit]

Please ensure that species and genus names are properly formatted. Both should be in italics, and the species epithet should be lower case. Genus species is correct, Genus Species is incorrect. You have many such errors on Endemism in the Hawaiian Islands‎‎ that should be fixed. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=The grammatical error was a mistake , l will not do it again. ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 04:21, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit not only shows that you have learnt nothing from your previous block because you continued to add unsourced text, but it also introduced a grammatical error. You are not welcome here. Graham87 (talk) 04:21, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry about the grammatical error, l will not do it again as it was a mistake and was not intentional. My previous block on putting unsourced content was not intentional either and was with good faith. I searched the internet and found these sources which you described as the unsourced text. [[1]], [[2]] and [[3]] After my block, l will promise to only put useful contributions in Wikipedia. Djfkf (talk) 01:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Djfkf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Graham87 blocked me due to a grammatical error and unsourced information when he saw this edit. The grammatical error was a mistake , l will not do it again.The unsourced text is not unsourced as l found it in these sources [[4]], [[5]] and [[6]]

Decline reason:

You clearly don't understand WP:CITE and WP:RS. Yamla (talk) 20:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Djfkf&oldid=1187245066"