User talk:Dope99

Welcome!

Hello, Dope99! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Owais khursheed (talk) 17:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Dope99, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Dope99! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Gerald Milton. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hi User:Gene93k Sorry for the misunderstanding. sincerely i wanted to protest but didn't know how to go about that. Thank you. • dope99 (talk)

Deletion discussion about Gerald Milton

Hello, Dope99,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Gerald Milton should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald Milton .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Versace1608 (Talk) 13:19, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for abusing multiple accounts and persistent disruptive editing, including repeatedly removing an "Articles for deletion" notice from an article, despite being told several times that doing so is unacceptable, removing content from the corresponding "Articles for deletion" discussion, attempting to give the impression of multiple editors supporting your position in a discussion by posting from numerous accounts, opening totally spurious "Articles for deletion" discussions, evidently as a sort of "revenge" for the fact that the article you created is under discussion, and other disruptive editing. Considering the extent of your disruptive editing, and the thoroughly dishonest way you have done it, you are lucky not to have been blocked indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dec 2014

 Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing.  War wizard90 (talk) 00:33, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dope99. Thank you. War wizard90 (talk) 00:49, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]