User talk:Dufresne tim

Welcome!

Hello, Dufresne tim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -🐦Do☭torWho42 (📼) 10:21, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Dufresne tim/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dufresne tim, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a thousand SineBot I would also like someone to look at my changes, the federicus page in italy has been deleted by wikipedia, for the reasons that make up for the changes. Who can give me a hand to clear the page or keep it with the right changes?

May 2017

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Federicus have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 12:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dufresne tim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The truth and the cone of matter can not be a cause for censorshipDufresne tim (talk) 13:33, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not give me any hope to believe you understand the significant problems with your edits so far, nor do I believe your edits would be different if the block was lifted. Yamla (talk) 13:38, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Maybe there was a mistake, I was blocked because I helped to disable a page that serves to advertise a mafia event, could you explain me?Instead of erasing the ads blocked me that I know both the event and the matter is a shame to allow those who exploit the children and threaten many people to stay on wikipedia!Yamla (talk) 13:38, 27 May 2017 (UTC)}}[reply]

It's really hard to understand what you are saying. Also, please do not sign my name. Anyway, perhaps you don't understand WP:NOR? You'll also want to read WP:CITE and WP:RS. You'll need to modify your unblock request below, explaining how your future edits will differ substantially from your previous edits and make specific reference to these policies. --Yamla (talk) 14:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dufresne tim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In-depth knowledge of the event and competence of the matter of historical re-enactment, wants to divulge the real identity of the phenomenon. I have only published the truth about an event that is actually a scam, documenting the business lapse of the scam and the suppression suffered by dissidentsDufresne tim (talk) 13:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are not listening, and if your next unblock request is just more of the same, you are likely to lose the ability to edit this talk page too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you want to tell me what the problem is! The original page is deleted for various reasons

Bbb23 (talk)I and others have been threatened by the organizers of this event because I have divulged the truth about the festival.

to understand!

I've told you. WP:NOR, WP:CITE, and WP:RS. --Yamla (talk) 14:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

tanks but Can wikipedia contain the publicity to a world that scams people?i request spedee delete of original page.Who has published the page is salaried by the organization, which some already call a carnival set

I have only published the truth about an event that is actually a scam, documenting the business lapse of the scam and the suppression suffered by dissidents SineBot --Yamla (talk) (talk)

This is irrelevant. You need to adhere to WP:NOR, WP:CITE, and WP:RS. For good measure, note you are running up against WP:TRUTH and WP:BATTLEGROUND. If you don't start showing evidence you have read and understood these policies, you will lose access to your talk page. Also, only one unblock request at a time. Please pick which unblock request you want active and remove the other. --Yamla (talk) 15:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I'll make it possible, I hope it's worth it and do not lose my trust on wikipedia, in the Italian version the page in question has already been deleted

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Dufresne tim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18681 was submitted on Jul 08, 2017 15:59:13. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:59, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dufresne tim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I said the truth! Have been blocked by incompetent administrators, Bbb23, I've unveiled an ad for a mafia association and I was stuck

Decline reason:

I'm removing talk page access as we're not getting anywhere. PhilKnight (talk) 22:28, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, User:Dufresne tim/sandbox

Hello, Dufresne tim. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 14:17, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]