User talk:Editor201503

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Download. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Christian Johnson seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -down load 20:54, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editor201503, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Editor201503! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Peter Budaj has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Peter Budaj was changed by Editor201503 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876332 on 2014-10-28T22:47:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:47, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained change.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jay-Z. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 19:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm ChamithN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Taylor Swift, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 16:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wizards of Waverly Place, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 16:39, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Peyton Manning. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 17:05, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hozier (musician). Murry1975 (talk) 19:06, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mfield (Oi!) 23:57, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Illuminati has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Illuminati was changed by Editor201503 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969002 on 2014-11-05T01:00:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Marco Di Vaio[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Please cite any changes you make, especially when you add information that may be controvertial. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Jargon777 Leave a message 01:28, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 02:41, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]