User talk:EditzIndia

EditzIndia, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi EditzIndia! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Bot requests, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:43, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete other editors' comments when you've read them, they're an archive for everyone's sake. Thanks. --Lord Belbury (talk) 21:05, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What? EditzIndia (talk) 04:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You asked a question on Wikipedia:Bot requests, then when someone answered it, you deleted the question and their answer, and asked it again slightly differently, perhaps hoping for a different answer? Don't delete other people's comments. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Asianet (TV channel). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 16:21, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Table we added in This Article is nice.It is not a disruptive. EditzIndia (talk) 17:17, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Asianet Movies, you may be blocked from editing. The clear consensus was to redirect this title, you should not be trying to recreate it from the redirect. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drishyam 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asianet. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Thank you for your recent contributions! DC | Thank you (talk) 09:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome EditzIndia (talk) 09:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

24 News Malayalam

Don't create article without sources as you did at 24 News Malayalam. There's a draft article out there (from when you created this article without sources before), use that to improve the article. This has to stop, your edits are starting to become disruptive from the time others have to take to clean up. Ravensfire (talk) 15:11, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No EditzIndia (talk) 15:13, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Ravensfire (talk) 15:14, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We Will add Sources but please Readd the page EditzIndia (talk) 15:18, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, who is this "we"? And use the draft article. Ravensfire (talk) 15:18, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok EditzIndia (talk) 15:20, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Twenty Four News Malayalam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Twenty Four News Malayalam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 18:07, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Sun Direct, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 20:12, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Star Sports (Indian TV network). Hydrogenation (talk) 17:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You really watched this Page correctly? It have a problem in Channel Section. Please View This page correctly And Edit this page. EditzIndia (talk) 17:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. You need to answer some questions first:

You referred to yourself as "we". Who is "we"? How many people does this account represent. You have been asked this before, and you did not answer.
Why do you not explain your edits in the edit summary? In particular when you make substantive changes without explanation, and you do this repeatedly, you can be blocked.
What association do you have with Star Sports or 24 News? If you are an employee, contractor, or even an intern of these organization, you entered into a legally binding agreement to disclose this when you set up your account.

Do not make further edits until you answer these questions. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That was a mistake (we). It is Type Issue. I Contributed Many Good Edits. EditzIndia (talk) 12:13, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have not answered all the questions. Especially the last one. Make no more edits until you do. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:05, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 24 News (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:24 News and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:24 News, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 24 News (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Locomotive207 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not much seems to have changed since the last decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:24 News and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:24 News, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 13:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Asianet Star Communications, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asianet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 24 News (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted without any attempt to address the issues.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:24 News and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:24 News, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 17:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, EditzIndia. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:18, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not answered the question I posed to you above, in the "June 2021" section. Instead you chose to ignore it. You must disclose any conflict of interest. What is your association with any of the subjects you are editing about?

I do not want to block you, but if you continue disregarding the policies here, and disregarding administrator questions, I will have no choice. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:18, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The message "WE" is Type Mistake only. EditzIndia (talk) 15:42, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Cuty Pie Sweetu per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cuty Pie Sweetu. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:19, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

EditzIndia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please Unblock me. I Don't Understand Your Reason for block me. I will Make Good Edits please Unblock me EditzIndia (talk) 14:42, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 16:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.