User talk:ElmoTheRockStar

This is ElmoTheRockStar's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nazareth Area Middle School (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nazareth Area Middle School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ElmoTheRockStar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Middle school

Thank you about that! I did a perfect job of the draft, Nazareth Area Middle School. It was constructed in 2008 and was completed in 2009. Kindergarten through 3rd grade used to be at the Nazareth Area elementary schools, 4th, 5th and 6th were placed at the new intermediate level from the former middle school, built in 1998. The new middle school contains 7th through 8th. The Nazareth Area High School, built in 1955, remains unaffected by the grade changes. 4th grade now moved back at the elementary schools. The intermediate school now contains 5th through 6th. It had a new swimming pool. I'm requesting the draft to move into an article I did a really great edit! ElmoTheRockStar (talk) 19:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nazareth Area Middle School has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nazareth Area Middle School. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:16, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article request

@Theroadislong I've fixed some issues, now I have to request an article when it's resubmitted and declined. I've added grade changes to the draft. ElmoTheRockStar (talk) 19:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nazareth Area Middle School (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:NSCHOOLS - Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nazareth Area Middle School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm NinjaRobotPirate. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Xander Mobus, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ElmoTheRockStar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for a Check User Block Account. ElmoTheRockStar (talk) 13:54, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been blocked as a checkuser block, which I guess is what you are trying to say. However, that is not a reason to unblock you. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 14:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ElmoTheRockStar (talk) 13:54, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ElmoTheRockStar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry! I promise not to be a checkuser block. Instead, I will make useful contributions instead.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:18, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Administrator note See also -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:20, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: Sorry for pinging you seemingly every few hours, but it looks like they're onto a new account (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ElmoTheRockStar). GPL93 (talk) 13:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: (sorry for ping) He is most probably at it again (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ElmoTheRockStar). Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 19:41, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shocked! Shocked I say! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:53, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PBS Kids logo (2022).svg

A tag has been placed on File:PBS Kids logo (2022).svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nate • (chatter) 21:28, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #62944 is closed.

Was socking Sept 8, 2022. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:27, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #82525

I have reenabled talk page access, as per UTRS appeal #82525, so the user can make their unblock request here. This account is not cleared by WP:CHECKUSER of block evasion at this time. That would need to happen if a compelling unblock request was made here. --Yamla (talk) 16:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]