User talk:EnDaLeCoMpLeX/Archive 5

Jewel discography

Are you angry at me for disagreeing with the singles chart on the Jewel discography awhile back? I just want to say I have no hard feelings towards you, and if you still need me to create an overview for her discography, I will. =) Dottiewest1fan (talk) 20:30, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well I'm sorry for disappointing you because I was trying to. It would definitely would make sense it the singles table was much larger with much more charts and TenPoundHammer also agreed. However, it is shorter and easier to read the way it is now, that's all =) I will add an overview right now. Dottiewest1fan (talk) 22:09, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added an overview. It looks pretty good, and I also added a pic. Dottiewest1fan (talk) 22:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Billy Ray

Ok, if you want, we can use the notes. Simone Jackson (talk) 18:40, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? Look to Some Gave All and Acky Breaky Heart. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Ray_Cyrus_discography According to me, it's also the best solution for the chart positions. Simone Jackson (talk) 23:13, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia is an enciclopedia and those notes are good for to inform the people that read the discography the chart positions. They are information. "we don't use footnotes to denote what country an album charted in". It's fake, look to Some Gave All and Acky Breaky Heart. They have got notes with chart positions and certifications in various country. Simone Jackson (talk) 17:03, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes and it wasn't removed because they are good infos for the people that read the discography. Simone Jackson (talk) 17:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Why it looks retarded? Simone Jackson (talk) 17:12, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but you prefer to post only some infos or all for a complete page? It's an enciclopedia and a person that looks it, want to know all. Simone Jackson (talk) 17:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's more comfortable to have all chart positions in a table. And the my version presents all the chart positions reperible online (except US Kids Albums, US Digital Albums and US Soundtrack Albums for Hannah Montana and Hannah Montana: The Movie). Simone Jackson (talk) 17:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure that Cover to Cover is a compilation? I know that it is a greatest hits album. Simone Jackson (talk) 14:09, 7 Nov. 2009 (UTC)

AUS Country

Those positions come from Pandora archives here. Langdon (talk) 04:11, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Creedence Clearwater Revival discography

Done Eric444 (talk) 14:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009.

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Adam Lambert, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Cinemaniac86^Oy_gevalt. 22:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Charts

Where do you get the international charts from? --Caldorwards4 (talk) 02:17, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Caldorwards4 (talk) 03:03, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody Said a Prayer

No, I didn't see that, but thanks for the heads-up. That's really cool! Its cool that he got a nod for that, since you know Country Music's video awards won't do the same... CloversMallRat (talk) 00:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is the voting online? If so, hit me with a link and I'll vote too. =) CloversMallRat (talk) 00:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Damnit, Sara Evans is my favorite singer and "Low" is one of my favorite songs. Lol. CloversMallRat (talk) 00:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian charts

I've initiated a discussion on the Canadian R&R charts here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:31, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Ray

Cool, thanks for the link. I'll check it out here in just a sec. CloversMallRat (talk) 04:36, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure whether he meant Brother Clyde or a solo album, but either way I don't expect this album to come out all that soon. Back to Tennessee was finished almost a year before it was finally released. I'm still excited though, I can't wait! Oh and I love his new hair-do lol. CloversMallRat (talk) 04:53, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deana Carter

Father Christmas is a studio album, it is considered to be her third studio album so relocating it to a "Holiday" subsection not only takes up more room, but it messes up her info. I'm Just a Girl isn't her third studio album, it was Father Christmas. But if you take it out, the order is off. Also, the live album and the greatest hits album don't need to be broken off into seperate groups either. It'd be different if she had like 3 GHs albums and like 5 live albums or something. CloversMallRat (talk) 20:50, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its all okay =) Although technically it is a Christmas album, it is considered by her, record label, and the review site as a studio album. CloversMallRat (talk) 21:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ready, Set, Don't Go

Thank you... I'm revamping all Miley Cyrus articles. I do think the image for the music video should go right per WP:IMAGE. It states, "In most cases, images should be right justified on pages, which is the default placement". -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 21:58, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

I put the picture to the right on other GA articles like Start All Over, Fly on the Wall (song) and Hoedown Throwdown. I guess it's kind of O.K. I was just following the rules. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 22:04, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead or Alive discography

Done Eric444 (talk) 02:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Nude remix.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nude remix.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 21:20, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last.fm

Just curious, but do you have an account on Last.fm? If not, you should get one, it makes listening to music all the more fun =) CloversMallRat (talk) 03:53, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lemme know if you get one, 'cause I can add you as a friend. CloversMallRat (talk) 23:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I found you n sent a friend request! CloversMallRat (talk) 22:02, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead or Alive discography

Your overview request is now complete. Dottiewest1fan (talk) 19:09, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whistlin' Dixie

I suppose I probably could. To be honest, I don't like Randy Houser. But, if you would like me to help you out, then I'll try. =) I'll look into it a little later in the day. CloversMallRat (talk) 17:47, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I got the article started, but I couldn't make it through the whole song so I'll leave the content section to you. CloversMallRat (talk) 22:32, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was that bad. Its ok if you like it though, we don't have to always have the same opinion. CloversMallRat (talk) 23:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Back to Tennessee (song)

Hello! Sorry to interrupt, but User:Liquidluck and I will be revamping Back to Tennessee (song) and we'd like to know if it was ever released as a digital or CD single. Please we need a source. Thank you. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 02:10, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Could you please find a source for the digital release as a single. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 21:28, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then I guess the infobox has to be changed to "song" not "single". -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 23:12, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

A sale site with a single cover or a discography that lists it as a single - Allmusic is a great example, but it's not listed there. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 23:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I found a source for a February 2, 2009 release but no word if it was digitally or CD or a single cover. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 23:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pop Songs

I absolutely do, and I think I may have to result in administrator intervention. That editor overly-criticizes Justin Bieber-related articles. Not only with the Pop Songs charts, I've also had trouble keeping a perfectly decent "Love Me" article that I was working on, with this editor. Candyo32 (talk) 01:16, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind getting an administrator to help us with the issue? Candyo32 (talk) 01:20, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Same here. I already started, I'm asking a few editors I've noticed that have dealt alot with album/song articles for their assistance. Candyo32 (talk) 01:23, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll post something on his talk page now. Candyo32 (talk) 01:28, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check my talk page. Candyo32 (talk) 01:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we'll have to leave the chart off. Candyo32 (talk) 02:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The user you referred doesn't know what do to, and I can't come to a consensus with the other edtior. Candyo32 (talk) 02:30, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Ugh is right. I don't know why the chart isn't acceptable. I'll still try to garner support, but I don't know what else to do. Candyo32 (talk) 02:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which was one of my points. Almost every song that charts on the Pop Songs is included in its article. Candyo32 (talk) 02:38, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why if it shouldn't be used, then why is it used so often in song articles? Candyo32 (talk) 02:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"We'll Get By Somehow"

Yeah, but lead singles to movies are often released as singles. Sara Evans' song "Low" was released from Billy: The Early Years. CloversMallRat (talk) 23:26, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but the way I see it there's a good chance of it getting released. And the movie may even have any official soundtrack release someday too. CloversMallRat (talk) 23:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Based on the stills, I think the music video looks like its going to be a good one, too. Is the video up on CMT or YouTube (or somewhere else) yet? CloversMallRat (talk) 23:35, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well! Keep me posted if you find it =) CloversMallRat (talk) 23:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallmark Channel eh? Well I'm sure I can see it somewhere else after it debuts... because I don't know if I have this channel, lol. CloversMallRat (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you gimme a link? Please & thanks! =) CloversMallRat (talk) 02:55, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. I guess I'll go check that out n see what I can do, lol. CloversMallRat (talk) 02:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep; it took me awhile, but I got the song and its playing. Its alright, nothing spectacular though. CloversMallRat (talk) 03:19, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Climb (song)

I see you are reverting some things in The Climb and I have to say that if there was a source for the Canadian country chart it would stay, but there is no source. Plus, the AC chart is airplay and per WP:CHARTS airpaly charts should not be in tables. You said its always there, but how many of those articles are GA or FA? Please leave that alone. I'm telling you because I don not want to start an edit war, that would hurt the GA nomination. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 04:42, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

You speak Spanish... cool. I don't have accents but here we go: Mira, en WP:CHARTS dice que la cobertura radiofonica no es permitida en Wikipedia en el tercer parrafo. AC es relacionada con la radio en Component chart. (Look, in WP:CHARTS it says that airplay charts are not permitted on Wikipedia in the third paragraph. AC is an airplay chart per Component chart. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 05:06, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Tal vez para ti no tenga sentido pero son las reglas y tienen que ser obedecidas. (It might not make sense to you but they are rules/guidelines and they have to be followed). De adonde eres? -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 05:16, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can I remove that then? One has no source and the other is an airplay chart... And please inform the other user reverting that too about my reasons. -- Ipodnano05 (talk) 05:29, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Danny Gokey

The statement from RCA Records is from a little over a week ago, and in that time I think that things may have changed. MusicRow is reporting that "It's Only" will be released in December, and there's nothing on the other song. RCA Records said the other single would be released soon, but no date has come up other than the one for "It's Only" -- and MusicRow is like Billboard, but for country releases... its pretty official and up-to-date is all I'm sayin'. CloversMallRat (talk) 01:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's fine by me. =) CloversMallRat (talk) 01:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course =D You don't seem to use Last.fm much, I was hoping you would lol. CloversMallRat (talk) 01:20, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ever listen to your own personal library? Like, I use Windows Media Player with my Last.fm scrobbler so my music listening shows up on there. And I also like using the Last.fm thing to select a "radio station" for the chance to get songs I like that I don't own. CloversMallRat (talk) 01:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RIAA

I'm not going to get into an edit war on this. I am well aware that RIAA will state "Multi-Platinum" for any album that is certified 2-plus times platinum on their site. In fact, the RIAA site actually states "MULTI-PLATINUM". If your reasoning is that "The RIAA uses it" then it'll have to be put in as all capitals here on wiki, you can't pick and choose what you want and what you don't. The "multi" terminology is redundant and grammatically incorrect. You don't put "10 multi-gallons" of gas into your car. You don't have three "multi-kids", and an album isn't three times "multi-platinum". It's three times platinum. Darwin's Bulldog (talk) 06:24, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

RIAA

RIAA database uses "n × Multi-Platinum" even though it's redundant, so I would say either works. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need You Now

It looks like it's fixed now. As a pointer, the album should be at Need You Now and the song at Need You Now (song) per precedent. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 00:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fifteen

Thanks for adding a citation for the info you added. I want to nominate it for GA as soon as Fifteen falls off the charts, so I want to make sure everything is accurate and reliably sourced. I moved the info up to the "chart performance" section.Liqudluck✽talk 20:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tears for Fears

Request complete. Dottiewest1fan (talk) 02:21, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tears For Fears discography

I'm prepared to be polite about this FOR NOW, but it was actually you who started reverting a few weeks ago. The article was fine until then, though the addition of your sources for various charts was useful. Okay:

1) As the TFF discography is merely an extension of the main TFF article page, it is not necessary to include a lengthy intro as this is essentially repeating information in the main TFF article and is detailed in the discography itself. In the intro, it is only necessary to state whose/what the discography is. Furthermore, the current longer intro is full of mistakes.

2) Date formats are different for various countries in the world, like spelling. As far as Wikipedia articles go, the native country of the article subject should be adhered to. TFF are a British band. The accepted date format for the UK is day-month-year.

3) Your edit also gives a US bias to the record labels the band were signed to. My edit lists both UK and US labels, or at least the wider corporation they belong to. Gut Records and New Door Records are totally separate entities though.

4) Billboard component charts (such as Dance, R&B, Modern Rock Chart, etc) should not be listed as per WP:MUSTARD unless the single/album failed to chart on the main Billboard chart. The only two singles that this seems to apply to are Laid So Low and Call Me Mellow, but rather than create two whole columns just for two singles, I have added footnotes to establish this. The inclusion of so many Billboard chart columns only takes up more room at the expense of charts from other countries.

80.47.127.121 (talk) 23:41, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your response -

1) Discographies are subpages, and subpages (as their name suggests) do not require masses of information to be repeated from their parent article page, especially when its something that can clearly be seen by reading the list or the infobox. Some editors do it, some don't, and what makes a "featured" list is basically a matter of taste. What's important to remember though is that a successful list is about the list itself and not about transplanting lots of unnecessary artist information from their main article pages. The Lightning Bolt discography, Aesop Rock discography, and Sugababes discography are also featured lists but their intros are relatively brief.

Aside from being unnecessary, the reason I deleted the long intro is because a lot of the information is either incorrect or too US-biased. Though they had success in the US, TFF are not a US band and have had success all over the world. I would be happy to reach a compromise on this and write a concise paragraph of around 10 lines that describes what the list is and offers details that enhances the discography rather than just reiterates it. That would make the best lead.

2) Agreed.

3) Agreed.

4) Modern Rock Tracks, Hot Mainstream Rock Tracks, and AC Tracks are all components of the Hot 100 Airplay, which itself is a component of the Billboard Hot 100. Sorry, but I made a mis-edit and didn't mean to include genre charts like Dance and R&B in this context. However, problems and discussions surrounding the Billboard charts (and their many components or genre charts) never end on Wikipedia and consensus tends to last for about 10 minutes. To complicate matters further, what guidelines there are seemed to be aimed more at individual singles articles (where charts are listed vertically in a table) rather than full artist discography tables (where various charts are listed horizontally). In a full discography table for an international band like TFF, it would be more appropriate to use only the main Billboard Hot 100 chart (listed as "U.S."), and list the various secondary/genre charts on the song article pages themselves (because that kind of page allows you to go into more detail). However, using them in this kind of full discography table only takes up room unnecessarily and limits the number of charts from other countries we can include before the table becomes a mess. In order to accomodate five different Billboard charts, you have had to delete South Africa and four European countries (bear in mind TFF are from Europe!). It also creates a definite problem with WP:UNDUE and we should let common sense prevail here. 80.47.127.121 (talk) 04:12, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Swift discography

Do not do a revert like that - I'm willing to compromise on the talk page and it won't be easy but we should do that. Let's compromise. My edits were not thoroughly discussed on the talk page and let's start a new section so more people can comment not just three people and for a longer time too. Please do not do that, please. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. I apologize for reverting without anyone's permission and for my edits without any discussion. I think it might be better for my version to be up meanwhile because that already has all teh citation formatting and so it's easier to just shift what you guys want being done. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lol... thank you. So O.K. I'm going to revert it one last time and we can start a new section called something along the lines of "Issues with new version". -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:51, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. Done, you can bring up any issues you have with the article and explain your resoning so I can explain mine and we can get to an agreement. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. That seems pretty cool. I already asked three people for their opinions on this but we'll have to wait until they log on but are you sure you don't want to put anything and see what they say about it? One of them has three FAs - two of which are discographies and will most likely be able to help and see what it should have to be a Featured List, which I want to nominate it for in the future. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad we could reach an agreement. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

:). I'm answering you comments right now. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I answered them. Could you see them? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message}

Ok, I stated my view on the subject. I think as a whole, Taylor Swift's discography looks a hot mess now. =/ CloversMallRat (talk) 07:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Albums

According to Wikipedia:Albums#Reception, the "reviews" field is no longer supposed to be used in the album infobox, and reviews are supposed to be summarized in a "Reception" section. See what I've done on Need You Now, for instance. Feel free to make this fix on other albums' articles, too, if you wish. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 12:42, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Jimmy Buffett discography

Thank you for your contribution to Buffett's discography (singles section), but I'm afraid I had to revert your edits once again. From all the sources I've gathered, Buffett is credited as "with" — not "guest" — on both "It's 5 O'Clock Somewhere" and Alan Jackson's cover single "Margaritaville". Specifically, the credits show (at least in the sources I've found) (with Jimmy Buffett), NOT (with special guest Jimmy Buffett) or (guest starring Jimmy Buffett) or even (featuring Jimmy Buffett). Until you find a source that either says that Buffett is specifically a guest star OR a source that says with = guest star, your edits will continue to be reverted.

Also, "Summerzcool" was released as a single in January 2009, while Buffet Hotel wasn't released until November 2009. Buffett also mentioned he was "in the studio recording (Buffet Hotel)" months after "Summerzcool" was released. If the song appeared on the album before it was released as a single, then we can include the album. But the song was a single months before the remainder of the album was even recorded (or possibly even written). Therefore, it's classified as a "single only".

Best, Geeky Randy (talk) 19:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Greenwood

Awesome job on the Lee Greenwood discography! =D Dottiewest1fan (talk) 18:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had revamped the Barbara Mandrell discography page awhile back and I was pondering whether I should also fix Greenwood's discography too. So thank you for doing so. Dottiewest1fan (talk) 18:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have heard of "God Bless the USA" before and I was in New York City when he performed the song right after 9/11 attacks happened. I had a lot of respect for him afterwords. Yeah, I wish he had some international chart peaks, and charted after his song recharted again in 2001. There's a lot of artists who don't international recognition and really deserve to have some. Dottiewest1fan (talk) 19:04, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

White Liar

Its not the record label's fault that Miranda Lambert didn't make it to #1 on Billboard (because it had a lot of momentum going for it), but Jason Aldean blocked it from #1 and sitting at #2 is a bad place to be. I'm really upset that she didn't make it to #1, too. Lol; it did reach #1 on Mediabase though, which the label will consider as a "Number one hit" in press releases and the like. CloversMallRat (talk) 22:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. It had a week where it reached #1 on Mediabase, but "The Truth" pulled ahead of it on Billboard and it went down in flames from there =/ It looks like it could still reach #1 in Canada, however. That I would be extremely happy with! CloversMallRat (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Boyle

I think you were wrong with this edit: [1]. It belongs in the Boyle article, but it doesn't look like it should because she has only released one album.Jarhed (talk) 01:46, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well I've never seen that before on an artists main page. However, most album/song articles do list their year-end chart in the album/song "chart performance" sections. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 01:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "Notice"

It's your talk page, remove the warning if you wish. Write comments like "bull" to undermine me, I really don't care. My goal is what's best for the article, not what's best for our egos. The truth of the matter is that you've failed to discuss why you've made changes here, even after I reverted, reverted again and politely explained my reasoning, and then reverted your edit a third time giving you an assume-no-faith warning (which resulted in you removing my post). If you edit the page to the way you want it without explaining yourself again, I'm taking the issue to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. It's not a threat, it's a fair warning. I've been patient and polite already, and all you've done is ignored my attempt at a discussion and re-edited the article to your liking. I've expressed my points as to why the article should stay the way it is. If you can't do the same, and change the article anyway, I will take action and I'll assume bad faith. Thank you. Geeky Randy (talk) 06:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Since you're a prominent country music editor, I thought you might like to voice your opinion on a discussion here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:06, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source

Thanks I appreciate your additions to American VI: Ain't No Grave. Would you mind citing these sources? Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:40, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Charts

Hi. Where do you obtain the U.S. and international music charts? In particular, Billboard's charts are not released until Thursday, and early Wednesday you have the new charts! Thanks. Noozgroop (talk) 13:49, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Justin Bieber discography

No problem! :) Candyo32 (talk) 03:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion

Hit there, don't forget that when you tag pages for speedy deletion that are attacks against someone or contain disparaging material against someone, (like Jon South) it's a good idea to also blank the content so it's not visible in the time between you tagging it and it getting deleted. Regards, --Beloved Freak 18:56, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - I see that you use Twinkle. If you tag as attack page, it blanks it for you which is useful! Regards, --Beloved Freak 19:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lyrics

Wikipedia:Lyrics and poetry is a page that explains why you generally shouldn't quote the lyrics; even in small amounts, it can be a copyright violation. An exception would be if there is a cited thing about a particular lyric — for example, "Music critic x disliked the lyric in which the singer said blah blah blah." or "At the artist's request, writer x changed the second verse to include the line blah blah blah." Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 19:19, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs written by Laura Bell Bundy

The above category has been nominated for deletion. MAybe you would like to comment? --Richhoncho (talk) 11:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mister Officer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mister Officer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:18, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brother Clyde

That's a bit of a disappointment, that the group isn't going in a country direction, which I hoped it would. =/ CloversMallRat (talk) 00:18, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

James Otto

Why did you remove the Pop 100 peak? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:05, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

No, it should be kept. He's not that far along, and that song is his only hit on several charts, so we might as well leave the Pop 100 peak as is. If... er, when Groovy Little Summer Song cracks the Hot 100/CAN Country charts, then we can add a footnote for JGSLY peaking on the now defunct Pop 100. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, don't count it out. I think this is gonna be the one. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:48, 17 March 2010 (UTC)