User talk:EthanGaming7640/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2

Drumpf

As requested in a message you have removed, please continue to find and undo edits such as this and this. Thanks, Certes (talk) 22:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

To add on to the above, please be aware of the special sanctions that Wikipedia has on the following topics that may be related:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Uyghur genocide. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Thank you,

Mikehawk10 (talk) 00:06, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Everything that had to do with it was
A total accident. EthanGaming7640 (talk) 01:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Automated grammar checking - please take care, particularly on policy pages

Hello - I see that you've been making grammar corrections to various pages, presumably (based purely on the edit summaries) with the assistance of a tool such as LanguageTool. Grammar and spelling clean-up is in general very much appreciated, but can I ask you to take care to ensure that the changes don't change the meaning of the text. This is particularly important on Wikipedia policy pages (e.g. here) - the text of policies has been developed through an extensive consensus process, and even minor grammar changes can change the meaning from what that consensus intended. Automated grammar fixes without careful human review are best avoided, as they would probably fall foul of our policy on bot-like editing - I'd recommend looking at participating in something like the Guild of Copy Editors instead (have a look at the 'New copy editors' section). Thanks! firefly ( t · c ) 15:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the info! (And yes, I do copy and paste the edit summaries.) EthanGaming7640 (talk) 15:29, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
No worries - feel free to ask me if you've got any questions, I'll keep this page watchlisted so you can just reply here. firefly ( t · c ) 15:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Just a comment about the edit summaries: I don't think directly pasting the software messages with no other explanation is a good idea. People initially assume a human wrote them, and that can sometimes give them a dogmatic or patronising tone which I'm sure you don't intend. (That applies especially with "rules" which vary between countries or publishers: the software might be trying to apply an American convention to an article which consistently uses the British one, for example. Good copy-editing will make it consistent within the article, not insist on one or the other.) It might be better to use something like punctuation as suggested by LanguageTool or whatever. Musiconeologist (talk) 17:51, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Hi, Ethan. I've had to revert a number of your edits, mostly to projectspace (policy/etc.) pages, because they violated various aspects of our Manual of Style. A number went against our rule on curly quotes, one added an incorrect comma, and one made a significant change to an explanatory supplement's meaning ("consensus" → "general consensus" [which is less strong than a regular consensus]) without indicating that it was doing so. I also reverted one edit that added a selfref hatnote to WP:ME at Me; MOS:SELFREF is a bit vaguer on these things, but I tend to remove any such hatnotes that aren't terms our readers or brand-new editors are likely to be using. (So the hatnote at AFD, for instance, I wouldn't remove, because "AFD" is an acronym a brand-new editor might hear out of context.) I appreciate your enthusiasm, but please familiarize yourself better with the Manual of Style and the information at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors before continuing to make copy-edits. I'd also encourage you to focus more on copy-editing articles than copy-editing projectspace pages. It's too easy to accidentally make a change that modifies the meaning of a policy/guideline/essay, unless you're very familiar with what the page in question means. Thanks, and happy editing. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 21:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hi EthanGaming7640, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! CapnZapp (talk) 12:43, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. -- ferret (talk) 20:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Please stop using LanguageTool and other automated grammar tools on Wikipedia. You've received several well meaning warnings and notices about this already, and especially in regards to using it against Policies and Guidelines. You continue to do so, despite the notices/warnings.
Automated grammar tools are generally not compatible with Wiki syntax or Wiki Manual of Style, and it's very disruptive for other users to have to review and revert automated editing, even if it's being done "by hand" through copy and pasting.
If you continue to ignore these warnings, you may be blocked to prevent further disruption. -- ferret (talk) 20:16, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Short Descriptions

Hello,

Please can you slow down with the short description additions, and make sure that you're checking each addition carefully? We don't display wikidata descriptions by default for a reason, because they're fairly rubbish and prone to vandalism. Have you read the guidance at Wikipedia:Short description?

This addition appears to have imported vandalism/a poor translation from wikidata [1], a better description would be something like "Mongolian musical instrument". Single word descriptions like "City" [2], "Family" [3], "battle" [4], "Organization" [5] [6] or "System" [7] are also unsuitable as short descriptions - a short description should contain slightly more information than that. Instead of "System" something like "United States Air Force telecommunication network" would be a much better short description. 192.76.8.74 (talk) 13:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

FYI re minor edits

Per Help:Minor edit: "A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism." Removing a template does not seem to fit within this limitatioon. Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

"James while John had a better effect on the teacher" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect James while John had a better effect on the teacher. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 11#James while John had a better effect on the teacher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 15:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Regarding your edit at the above, please do not correct typos in other users' posts on talkpages. See WP:TPO for more information. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 16:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Automated grammar fixes to policies (again)

Hi Ethan - please stop making automated grammar fixes to Wikipedia policies. I’ve reverted your most recent change as it changed the capitalisation of terms that are capitalised on Wikipedia as the names of specific venues. This is why automated correction tools used without strong knowledge of WP are a bad idea, as was mentioned above. firefly ( t · c ) 20:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

That had nothing to do with LanguageTool EthanGaming7640 (talk) 20:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Rcat shell

Please do not add {{Redirect category shell}} to a bunch of single-rcat redirects. This clogged by watchlist and did not improve the redirect. Thank you. ― Qwerfjkltalk 09:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Malay sponge cake: Can we remove the section "Historical origins and similar varieties around the world"?

Or at least DRASTICALLY cut it down?

I didn't come to this article to read the complete history of sponge cake in 16th century Spain or whatever. It's not central to this article, and would be better suited for sponge cake in general, or whatever. 72.76.95.136 (talk) 16:47, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Re: November 2021

Ah thanks, I had a feeling something like that existed but wasn‘t sure where to find it. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 19:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

You should get Twinkle. It is very useful, you can easily roll back edits without needing the rollback permission, and you can just press a couple buttons to warn a vandal or welcome a constructive editor. You can enable Twinkle at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets, section Browsing.
(and the message I left you was, in fact, a user warning template itself.) EthanGaming7640 (talk) 20:17, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
I‘ll take a look! JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 04:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

I think you may be checking the "This is a minor edit" box a bit too often

According to Help:Minor edit, examples of minor edits include "typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism." You can find examples of "major" edits here. Not sure? Help:Minor edit instructs: "if you are in doubt about whether an edit is minor or not, it is always safer not to mark it as minor." (In case you're curious, this edit is the one that prompted me to write.) Butwhatdoiknow (talk)

EthanGaming7640 — Preceding unsigned comment added by RootEpoch (talkcontribs) 08:36, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Congregation Dorshei Emet

I work for CDE, I made the changes for our page. some of the details are inaccuarte. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.175.225.139 (talk) 16:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Talk pages of your user subpages

Hi! I noticed that you've created talkpages for many of the subpages of your userpage (see Special:PrefixIndex/User_talk:EthanGaming7640/). Most of those seem to contain a substituted version of {{Talk header}} and some archival settings. I'm not sure why you would want these subpages to exist, anyone who would want to discuss something about those pages with you should probably just post on your primary talk page (this page). Also, the archival settings cause all of these pages to show up in Category:Pages where archive parameter is not a subpage. My suggestion would be to either ask for all those talk pages to be deleted (by putting {{db-u1}} on them), or redirect them here (by putting #REDIRECT [[User talk:EthanGaming7640]] on them). Let me know if you have any questions! --rchard2scout (talk) 10:21, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Except, the only ones I would not redirect to my main talk page are Archive 1 (and other archives) and /Editnotice. EthanGaming7640 (talk) 14:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
No, of course, you can leave those as they are. --rchard2scout (talk) 07:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Your signature

Hello, EthanGaming7640. I noticed that your signature contains an image. Wikipedia has a policy (Wikipedia:Signatures#Images) that images may not be used in signatures. As such, could you please remove the image from your signature? Thanks. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 21:26, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Image removed.
See? — EthanGaming7640, Counter-Vandalism Unit 21:26, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

About editing

Hello i removed that part because it isn't true , it is just a fake folklore , Mata Jambavati is Sita Mahalakshmi , she is mentioned as Sita in Rama Sahasranam that's why i removed that part nothing else Vichitravi (talk) 01:09, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for letting me know. EthanGaming7640, Counter-Vandalism Unit 01:09, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
am the one Juliet chinonso sunday (talk) 21:35, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

About Deepin

Wiki should have a neutral point of view, and it is unfair to deepin to only quote the accusations of the heads of commercial companies against open source software. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.166.220.195 (talk) 03:31, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Touch grass lol

3,0000 edits in 3 months damn — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.0.162.27 (talk) 18:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

All-Around Amazing Barnstar

All-Around Amazing Barnstar
after undoing your additon of short description on WP:PERM, I went through your edits, and I saw you are active in many different fields. You truly deserve this barnstar. Thanks for all your contributions. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook(talk) 20:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Edens Zero Edit

Thanks for letting me know to do it in the talk page, however im not very good with the Wikipedia editor. I mostly just use the Fandom Editor which I am also not very good with but, Thanks for letting me know! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SekiganKing (talkcontribs) 18:46, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

@SekiganKing: You could also use an HTML comment, where it is in the wikitext but cannot be viewed by the readers. — EthanGaming7640, Counter-Vandalism Unit 18:57, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 22

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

Get some cheetos

CheetosCrop spicey gift
Get some cheetos Zander101121 (talk) 13:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Get a cup of coffee for your work! Zander101121 (talk) 13:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Why ?

What was the benefit of making this edit, instead of adding a reference to an article with unsourced statements. How many of your edits today would you describe as constructive and how many would you describe as a complete waste of time and which do nothing but inflate your edit count ? Nick (talk) 22:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi EthanGaming7640 and Nick, this is currently at WP:AN#Tech question about edits that make no visual difference. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:42, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Per the discussion ToBeFree linked to and the just-updated WP:COSMETICBOT policy section, in the future, avoid edits that consist only of changing whitespace. Enterprisey (talk!) 23:36, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Not to pile on, but I'm the one that raised the point at ANI, not to spank you, but to get clarity on policy. But yes, any time an edit will not make a noticeable, visual difference in the article, you should not make it. Cluttering up histories with no benefit to the reader is looked down upon. Dennis Brown - 12:23, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

CSD of M.K Varghese

Just wanted to let you know that the author of the page [[M.K Varghese]] removed the CSD tag you added to it. I added it back but you might wanna watchlist the page or something to make sure they don't keep doing it. bop34talkcontribs 03:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

P value

P value of less than 89.198.238.82 (talk) 20:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Glenn Greenwald sexuality

Hello brother! It seems like you misclassified my well-meaning comment as vandalism. Glenn Greenwald is indeed a homosexual. ~~ 172.58.197.0 (talk) 23:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

obstetrics and gynaecology

Hello, it appears you removed my edit by mistake. I just noticed that over half this article was made up of irrelevant and biased gender ideology propaganda. Perhaps this had gone by unnoticed so I just decided to be helpful and remove it. If you feel that misleading, one-sided content belongs on Wikipedia rather than objective data, please go ahead and reinstate what I removed and I deeply regret my misinterpretation of this site's mission. 199.59.118.81 (talk) 02:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

That's why you always use an edit summary. EthanGaming7640 02:22, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Usage of Capricorn to tag redirects

With this edit you incorrectly tagged a project page redirect to a talk page with {{R to project namespace}}. Should have used {{R to talk page}} for that. Please be more careful. Thank you for your diligence and your contributions, and Happy New Year! P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 16:50, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks—it's just my instinct to tag with {{R to project namespace}}. EthanGaming7640 17:31, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Why

Why — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:709B:2501:1C79:1C57:51CF:3A99 (talk) 22:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

American commenting on British Politics

Hello Sir,

I respect your edit, but are you in a position to edit political articles in a country that isn't yours? I was actually trying to add a quote to the page but didn't go about it the right way, i'll try again later.

Luke from London, UK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.52.232.110 (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

I just like to revert vandalism, and your edit looked like vandalism.
EthanGaming7640 15:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Information icon Hello EthanGaming7640. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), patent nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. Spicy (talk) 17:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

Nerd

Homie please get a sense of humor. Obviously you're a massive nerd and you can't take a joke. Otherwise no offense brodie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russianmandog (talkcontribs) 23:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

William Dalrymple (historian) edits -- not vandalism. Please recheck. In any event, not vandalism. 107.127.46.22 (talk) 02:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

just a note

Samuel Ryan Curtis doesn't exactly fall into the category of a BLP. --*Fehufangą✉ Talk page ♮ 01:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Okay, my mistake. Thanks. EthanGaming7640 01:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Removing rcats

Hi Ethan, could you explain why you removed the rcat {{R from alternative scientific name}} from the talk page of Leptura propinqua?. As a synonym of this species, it is an appropriate rcat, and the same as over 6,000 other redirects with this same rcat. Loopy30 (talk) 02:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

That template is not valid in talk page space. EthanGaming7640 02:11, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

A question?

How Do You Get Extended Confirmed Users And What Do You Have To Do To Get That Status? Opnkinopin (talk) 13:38, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Extended confirmed is automatically granted after thirty days and five hundred edits, or manually granted by administrators. EthanGaming7640 18:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Ok Thanks For the info Opnkinopin (talk) 01:03, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

Orphans in Russia

I didn't make any edit to that page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.150.170.2 (talk) 17:35, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Question: Is this a shared or dynamic IP address? Because if it isn't, you did make an edit to that page. It was here. EthanGaming7640 17:38, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Anti-vandalism

Hello, EthanGaming7640. Have you ever considered applying for the rollback permission? I've seen your continuous interest in anti-vandalism, and you, in my opinion, would be more than qualified for rollback. — 3PPYB6TALKCONTRIBS — 16:45, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

I have considered applying, maybe I will do it soon. EthanGaming7640 16:55, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
I also think it's a good idea seeing as you are one of the most active users in RedWarn. --Ferien (talk) 21:47, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

Wikipedia Article Request

I'm a Musical Artist and I need a Wikipedia article biography about me. My articles has been deleted twice. I need help please. Johnel NG (talk) 19:03, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Please see WP:BLP, WP:AB, WP:COI, and WP:N. EthanGaming7640 21:50, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Very Important Questions :)

What does 3rr mean? 2409:4063:4D05:3FEB:4DEB:38B8:D15D:8444 (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)My Sign

WP:3RR is a policy. EthanGaming7640 17:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Oh, okay. Have you watched Life(2017) yet? I watched it today it was sad. 2409:4063:4D05:3FEB:4DEB:38B8:D15D:8444 (talk) 17:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

Impersonator?

I am presuming this isn't you, and will block them. User:EthanGaming0467. Secretlondon (talk) 13:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes, that is not me. EthanGaming7640 14:32, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

people

0.6 5.211.138.188 (talk) 03:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

Dfghjnc

Dddgghfvbjuu 130.193.245.162 (talk) 21:10, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

Marley Dias Mistake...

Sorry if I made a mistake. That day, my computer was hacked by people who got into my system when I wasn't paying attention. Thanks so much for correcting it, it means a lot. Goodbye for now! 4.14.63.66 (talk) 14:38, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 March 2023