User talk:Excelsoo28

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Excelsoo28. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 13:22, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to be done - your comments about getting information from the owner suggest undeclared paid editing is happening. Ravensfire (talk) 13:56, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Excelsoo28, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Excelsoo28! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

19:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Your recent editing history at Rashmi Sharma Telefilms Limited shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Discuss your changes on the article talk page and get consensus before continuing to force them into the article. Issues have been raised about your changes, repeatedly, and you are ignoring them. This needs to stop. Ravensfire (talk) 14:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are beyond the 3 revert limit for Rashmi Sharma Telefilms Limited, if you put your changes back in again, I will report this to the WP:EWN. Ravensfire (talk) 14:02, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Excelsoo28 reported by User:Ravensfire (Result: ). Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 23:19, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Many of your edits are lacking the needed sources that Wikipedia requires. You haven't asked anyone for help, so I've assumed you know what was needed, but just in case, please PLEASE read the pages on reliable sources which explains what Wikipedia considers good sources and why they are needed. The page Help:Citations quick reference is a good place to learn how to add those sources to articles the right way. You also need to start using the article talk page to discuss your edits. Ideally, editing on Wikipedia follows a WP:BRD cycle - you Boldly make a change, but when someone Reverts your edits, you Discuss it on the article talk page, not just keep making the edit over and over. That just ends up with you blocked from editing and helps nobody. Ravensfire (talk) 23:26, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Rashmi Sharma Telefilms Limited

Hello Excels0028. You've been warned for edit warring on this article and for adding unsourced material. You are risking a block if this happens again. Your best option is for you to propose all changes on the article talk page, and wait for others to give their support. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:24, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devoleena Bhattacharjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Star Parivaar Awards

Re: this and similar edits, the Star Parivaar Awards is a garbage award that has no place in a neutral encyclopedia. That award exists only to lavish praise onto its own shows and employees. It is the academic equivalent of bragging that your mum thinks you're handsome. See this discussion and the unanimous conclusion that it should not be included in articles. Please don't add this content again. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caste and other unsourced changes

Re: this, you don't get to decide what caste a person is in and you don't get to refactor content that isn't supported by the existing sources. Caste labels for a living person have to be self-identified, as some people, like Amitabh Bachchan do not subscribe to the caste system. It is not sufficient to guess caste based on family names or any other content. Don't make such changes again, as this is a highly problematic area and you will be subject to immediate discretionary sanctions. And don't add or change biographical details unless you can attribute them to reliable mainstream sources that have an established reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of programs broadcast by Colors‎ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ravensfire (talk) 03:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rashmi Sharma Telefilms

This article was deleted in a discussion and and paid editor trying to force recreation so many times it is protected from being created again. Do NOT wikilink this again, the article was deleted for good reasons which have NOT changed. I'm hoping you've read WP:PAID and are making any required disclosures. I'm also hoping you don't have any previous accounts that have been blocked. Your promotion of this company is starting to raise serious concerns about your editing. Ravensfire (talk) 05:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still very concerned about you having a COI and promoting this company. Edits like [1] where you are bolding the company name (and done across multiple other articles) are NOT how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia is not here to promote a company which is how it appears you are using it. Don't make edits like that again. If you need a policy reason besides NPOV, read MOS:BOLD. Ravensfire (talk) 14:58, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your promotional and COI edits around this company. The article was deleted multiple times and is HIGHLY unlikely to be recreated, certainly not as a paid article. Red links are inappropriate in this case and WILL be removed. Ravensfire (talk) 14:41, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please make again page of this company,i sure i not edits this page after build Excelsoo28 (talk) 00:05, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Muskaan (TV series) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Blanking the article is vandalism. Stop. Ravensfire (talk) 14:42, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Star Bharat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 14:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shakti - Astitva Ke Ehsaas Ki, you may be blocked from editing. Ravensfire (talk) 14:44, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

YOU PLAYING WITH MY EMOTIONS? FUCK PERSON!! Excelsoo28 (talk) 14:44, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shakti - Astitva Ke Ehsaas Ki. Stop with the deletes. You will only end up blocked and not help yourself or Wikipedia. Ravensfire (talk) 14:45, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WIKIPEDIA IS FREE FOR ALL PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD! SO WHY YOU DELETED MY EDIT? I DON'T HAVE PROBLEM WITH YOU Excelsoo28 (talk) 14:45, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jag Janani Maa Vaishno Devi - Kahani Mata Rani Ki, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Don't make edits where bold the production company name. You've been warned about this multiple times and keep doing it. There's obviously some undeclared WP:COI or paid editing happening here. Stop it. [2] Ravensfire (talk) 18:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TV cast sections

Read WP:TVCAST and follow it. Your recent edits to Shakti - Astitva Ke Ehsaas Ki go against Wikipedia consensus. Ravensfire (talk) 20:03, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rubina Dilaik and Vivian Dsena currently leaved the show and the character end 2 week ago,please Ravensfire move Rubina Dilaik And Vivian Dsena from lead role. Excelsoo28 (talk) 01:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excelsoo28, Did you even both to read WP:TVCAST? Obviously not! Again, Wikipedia articles are about THE ENTIRE SHOW, not just the current state. Ravensfire (talk) 01:25, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Shakti - Astitva Ke Ehsaas Ki, you may be blocked from editing. Dede2008 (talk) 15:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 15:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I received inform from team! And i edits same with instruction from team production. Why you always change my edits?? Stupid editors are sukhjeet04 and sid95q ! Excelsoo28 (talk) 15:46, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]