User talk:Fodbold-fan

Asbjørn Gaarde

Your recent editing history at Asbjørn Gaarde shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Giant Snowman 21:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Gabriel Vargas (footballer)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Gabriel Vargas (footballer) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 5#Gabriel Vargas (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 14:19, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Independiente Rivadavia squad

Done Giant Snowman 09:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! What was wrong? Just in case it happens again! Fodbold-fan (talk) 18:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barracas Central, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francisco Solé.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Club de Gimnasia y Esgrima La Plata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Napolitano.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Matuko (talk) 23:08, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tomáš Lněnička

The article Tomáš Lněnička has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about non-notable footballer which fails WP:GNG. His single appearance in the Czech first league is not a presumption of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 03:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Florent Balmont

Hi. Thanks for updating Florent Balmont. Could you explain why you removed his appearance for Dijon II from the infobox? It's reliably sourced in the stats table. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robby.is.on. I just think that it was a bit misplaced. That was the only reason. But I probably should have had it crammed in as some text instead. I thought it looked a bit out of place that it was in the infobox. Fodbold-fan (talk) 17:40, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK Robby.is.on (talk) 21:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Troels Kløve seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Giant Snowman 15:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced info about BLPs, again

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Sebastian Denius article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 15:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Antonio Dominique. Giant Snowman 22:11, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kristian Riis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meniscus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Fodbold-fan. Thank you for creating Victor Bak Jensen. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Fodbold-fan!

Happy New Year!

Fodbold-fan,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:03, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ottman Dadoune

Hello, thank you for this edit you made to Ottman Dadoune, it was constructive. Just one thing; although the source you used was good, it would be better if you cited it in a proper reference rather than just putting the url in an invisible comment. You can see more about this at WP:CITINGSOURCES. Thank you very much! Paul Vaurie (talk) 06:35, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denmark national under-21 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nancy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tobias Bech. Giant Snowman 19:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is your problem again? Stop harrasind me. And start opening your eyes! Do you see Soccerway, or? Tired of you. Fodbold-fan (talk) 19:50, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at David Turpel. Giant Snowman 21:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What did I vandalize Giant??????????? Fodbold-fan (talk) 17:51, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the (valid) Progrès Niederkorn stats. Giant Snowman 18:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop it. That's not vandalizing. Conversely, there are no sources in the article that tell how many games he has played. So stop it Giant!!! Fodbold-fan (talk) 18:55, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong - the Soccerway source does. So you didn't check it? Giant Snowman 18:56, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fupa is not a reliable source

Hi Fodbold-fan. Fupa is not a reliable source as it's user-generated. I've reverted your addition at Tobias Steffen. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 20:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Bertels

Hi Fodbold-fan. At Thomas Bertels, where did you get the TuS Ehringhausen and VfB Schloß Holte numbers from? No source in the article seems to support them or even that he played for these clubs at all. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robby.is.on. Thank you for your kind inquiry. Many other users (no names mentioned) could learn from this ;)

I have just now updated the article. I must admit that sometimes it goes a little too fast and I forget to include sources. I have to apologize for that. And I had actually misspoken a bit, which I have also corrected. There were - as you can see from the source - several people named Bertels, which is why I had counted some wrong Bertels xD Fodbold-fan (talk) 17:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mm, how can you tell that https://www.kicker.de/ama-57366097/spieler and http://tus-ehringhausen.de/1-mannschaft/zahlen-daten refer to our Thomas Bertels? Both his first and last name are quite common in Germany. His TuS Ehringhausen stint is plausible since he played for that club as a youth but we need to be sure. Robby.is.on (talk) 17:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With a very simple search on the largest soccer database available (although Wikipedia does not consider this source credible) we can see that there is only one Thomas Bertels: https://www.transfermarkt.com/schnellsuche/ergebnis/schnellsuche?query=Thomas+Bertels&x=0&y=0

In addition, you can also do a search on one of Germany's largest databases FuPa (also not considered credible here) where only two are named Thomas Bertels, one of which has only played for one other club. That's for sure not him. That said, you can further confirm this by searching his name along with those clubs on Google. I checked this before I updated the article earlier. It's 100% him.

In relation to when the statistics from Kicker relate to, you can click around a bit on the website. Take a look here, where you can see which seasons the statistics in question are collected from: https://www.kicker.de/ama-57366097/spieler-einsaetze

I'm pretty comfortable with what I've updated :-) Fodbold-fan (talk) 17:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. The problem is that anyone reading the article cannot extract the information and explanations you gave me from the article. Wikipedia:Verifiability, one of Wikipedia's core content policies, demands that "other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source." You have demonstrated here to me that the information you added is true but, quoting Wikipedia:Verifiability again, "Even if you are sure something is true, it must have been previously published in a reliable source before you can add it". And these sources need to be in article.

I have added two newspaper articles which confirm he played for TuS Ehringhausen and VfB Schloß Holte.

Thank you for your kind inquiry. Many other users (no names mentioned) could learn from this ;) You're welcome. I try hard to be patient. At the same time, please understand that it is frustrating for other editors when they get the impression they need to explain basic Wikipedia policies to an editor who has been around for a long time and violates them repeatedly. Robby.is.on (talk) 17:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naarh. There are tons of articles that haven't been updated in years. So I think we should take care of those of us who do this voluntarily. No one makes money from it. So I don't understand why people in here aren't just happy that some of us are doing this instead of constantly correcting each other. Everyone knows that my work is something I check before I publish it. I am, and probably never will be, good at sources. But everyone can see that my work is credible. Otherwise, I would have been permanently banned long ago. So the short answer is: NO, I don't understand why people write the way they do in here. This is MY way of working and I do it as best I can. If it HAS to be more than what I do now, then I don't think I will continue as a volunteer on Wikipedia. Fodbold-fan (talk) 18:09, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are tons of articles that haven't been updated in years. Realistically, it's rather unimportant and perhaps even WP:UNDUE where Thomas Bertels played after ending his professional career. We shouldn't feel obligated to include all information we can find.

Wikipedia:Verifiability is non-negotiable. If you were to insist this core content policy does not apply to you, then I would be one of those calling for you to be blocked from editing. It would be a pity but in the collaborative project that Wikipedia is we cannot allow editors to flout basic principles of editing that the community has agreed upon through extensive discussion. Robby.is.on (talk) 18:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm doing pretty well ;) Fodbold-fan (talk) 19:30, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? You were blocked six times between 2015 and 2019. Since then, you've racked up plenty more warnings for unsourced editing. The community's patience will run out if you continue like this. Robby.is.on (talk) 19:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure, yes. I fell that I'm doing Wikipedia a big favor with my editings. It's not vandalism, it's just that I sometimes forget to include the sources.

Also because sometimes adding sources is a bigger project because you have to write a lot of text for the articles, which is already undernourished. Many times I just want to update the infobox, and it's difficult to add sources in the infoboxes. It looks ugly, first of all.

But I'm happy to take advice from you :) Fodbold-fan (talk) 20:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Fodbold-fan. Thank you for your work on Oscar Meedom. Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing articles. I have reviewed this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 18:25, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Fodbold-fan. Thank you for your work on Magnus Lysholm. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox stats

Please ensure that when you update the stats you also update the date, using ~~~~~. If you have any questions please ask. Giant Snowman 18:30, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Denmark national under-21 football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ried.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Enock Otoo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Enock Otoo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 19:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I dont know what else you want me to add. There is not many sources about him. Fodbold-fan (talk) 20:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not having sources about him are directly prohibitive when it comes to creating a Wikipedia article. Some sources might come up, though! Geschichte (talk) 08:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emile Chambo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Emile Chambo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 19:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mikel Gogorza moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mikel Gogorza. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 18:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mikel Gogorza has been accepted

Mikel Gogorza, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cambalachero (talk) 17:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Opoku moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Michael Opoku. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 02:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really have anything to do with this, but would advise to add a non-primary source before hoping to get the draft accepted. Geschichte (talk) 08:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enock Otoo (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Instagram is not a source we can rely on, kindly replace it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enock Otoo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fodbold-fan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:27, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vanderwaalforces. Whether it's Instagram or not, the source comes from the Right To Dream Academy's own official profile, so I don't think it CAN get any more credible than that. It's not a player that there is a lot of information about at the moment, which is why I think that what we have right now is optimal and gives a credible and realistic picture of his profile. I hope you can see and agree with that. Fodbold-fan (talk) 18:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Fodbold-fan. Thank you for your work on Mike Themsen. Another editor, Bruxton, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 20:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vitória F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campeonato de Portugal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enock Otoo (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Oltrepier were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

I don't think enough progress has been made since last time, unfortunately... While the sources you cited do mention the player, you should add some independent and reliable sources, as well, so we don't have to rely solely on the websites of clubs. Plus, you should avoid using social media (such as Instagram) and user-generated platforms (like Transfermarkt) as sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enock Otoo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oltrepier (talk) 10:21, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Piero Cabel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Piero Cabel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piero Cabel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 00:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of José Dávila for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article José Dávila is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Dávila until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 00:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enock Otoo (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiiformii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough secondary sources, Instagram is a user-generated website and one of the sources is a match against another team, I think it just needs some independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enock Otoo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wiiformii (talk) 17:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emile Chambo (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emile Chambo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enock Otoo (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enock Otoo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FootballDatabase.eu

This is not deemed to be reliable, please do not use it. Giant Snowman 15:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I see that? Fodbold-fan (talk) 15:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Robby.is.on: might be able to guide you to the relevant discussion, I have noticed him on my watchlist removing links. Giant Snowman 15:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I'd been relying on FootballDatabase.eu frequently. But a discussion at the Reliable sources/Noticeboard from December 2023 found it to be unreliable as the website's user generated. WP:WPFLINKSNO should list football-specific that have been established to be unreliable. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fodbold-fan, you used FootballDatabase.eu at David Manga so I reverted your change. Please do not use it. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 21:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Opoku (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary references do not in any startegic way show notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Opoku and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:34, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Fodbold-fan. Thank you for your work on Aris Vaporakis. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vejle Boldklub, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emmanuel Yeboah.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Opoku (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Oltrepier was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Opoku and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oltrepier (talk) 19:06, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Fodbold-fan. Thank you for your work on Marius Papuga. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Fodbold-fan. Thank you for your work on Andreas Smed. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Justin Janssen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Janssen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Janssen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 20:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enock Otoo (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kline was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Same issues as the last two comments. Fix them or your submission will eventually be rejected.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Enock Otoo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kline • talk • contribs 00:16, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Opoku (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Opoku and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]