Jump to content

User talk:Glo145

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello

[edit]

Hello, Glo145. I know that I'm late in saying this, but welcome to Wikipedia. If you ever have any questions about Wikipedia, don't hesitate to ask me. I'll see you around. Flyer22 00:31, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad that you expanded the Leo du Pres article; it needed it, of course. It's no longer a stub, so I'll remove the stub tag.


ljkljGlo145 (talk)

Whenever you expand an article that is a stub, make sure to remove its stub tag, which can be found at the bottom of the article. And, Glo, there are some important things about editing articles on Wikipedia (on real subjects or fictional subjects) that you should know. To start with... When creating a heading within an article on Wikipedia, make sure that the part of the heading after the first word is not capitalized, unless it is an official name of something in which is capitalized...like New York City. Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (capital letters)#Section headings, you should only capitalize the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns in headings, but leave the rest lower case. For example: Character history, not Character History...Family and relationships, not Family And Relationships (or Family & Relationships).

Also, Wikipedia's plot summaries should be in present tense, as is addressed in this link: Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas#Tense. I know that link states preferred. But a good (or great) formatting style for Wikipedia is considered to be when an article's plot summary is worded in present tense. To read up on more of that, you can click on this link. I was opposed to it at first as well, but now it seems really right to me, perhaps because I'm used to it now. But having the plot in present tense, with the year in which it happened if it's a soap opera (though years are not usually needed for present tense of film plot summaries), as to clarify that it's not happening now makes a lot of sense, considering that just as if watching a movie, a television show, or a play, it really does seem as though it's happening as you read.

And, oh...remember, when talking on talk pages here at Wikipedia, to sign your user name using four tildes ~~~~. There are plenty of other things that you'll eventually learn about Wikipedia, if you continue to edit here, but the ones that I mentioned above are a few of the more important things that I felt the need to tell you about at this moment. I have more to tell you about concerning Wikipedia, of course, but that can come later. Anything you need to know about Wikipedia, of course though, ask me. Flyer22 21:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Flyer, sorry about all the problems, I've caused you. But I could use some help on the Gloria Marsh page I created, maybe just the system is slow, but it isn't working. Glo145 3, October 2007

What I did was just copy and past what I did to the Gloria marsh article and put it into a new Gloria Marsh article, with Marsh capitalized. I hope that is okay. Glo145

Okay I just figured out how to change article names, stupid me just go to the move button!! Sorry. Glo145

No, don't be sorry, and don't call yourself stupid for that (not to mention...it's happened to other editors, of course, new or unfamiliar with aspects of Wikipedia). You haven't given me any problems. It's refreshing and great to have another editor working on the soap opera articles, especially one that's not a vandal. As for the Gloria Marsh article, the only thing that's a problem, if you can call it that, is that it should be the word "and"...rather than "&" for the heading Flings and relationships, but I'll fix that. Talk with you later. Flyer22 01:09, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you moved Barbara Esensten to that title.

Now we have to merge the James Harmon Brown article in that one as well. Flyer22 21:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, I couldn't get the James Harmon Brown article to merge into the new one. It would be great if you could do that. Glo145 21:51, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Flyer22 03:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I moved this article from James Harmon Brown & Barbara Esensten to James Harmon Brown and Barbara Esensten. It's a more appropriate title than with the &. Flyer22 06:33, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Carla Kettner

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Carla Kettner, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Burger. Thank you. LeyteWolfer 16:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Anna Fricke

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Anna Fricke, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Burger. Thank you. LeyteWolfer 16:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Time for more

[edit]

Hey, Glo. I see that you've become even more active with editing Wikipedia. I told you earlier that I'd inform you of other Wikipedia policies, as to help you, and, well, I'm back at your talk page to do just that. I saw you have trouble formatting a reference just an hour ago or so, the one to the Julia Santos article. Well, as for formatting references, take a closer look at how the references are formatted in the let's say...the Babe Carey article or a look at Wikipedia:Citation templates, and I'm sure that you'll get the hang of it.

I've also noticed that you've been rating soap opera character articles now. I want to give you some advice that an article shouldn't really be rated a B unless it's extensive with knowledge and is referenced somewhat or thoroughly...like the Bianca Montgomery article (I'm still improving that article, however). You probably already know that an article should not be rated GA (Good Article), A (A-class) or FA (Featured Article) unless it undergoes a nomination process for such, where it is deemed by a group of editors (sometimes one in the GA nomination process) as either meeting the status it is nominated for or not meeting that status. If you didn't know that, well, I've just clued you in on that matter, of course.

And you should also know about Wikipedia's notability policy. Read up on that and it will save you a lot of trouble in matters of what articles to create. It also helps to judge which articles should be deleted from Wikipedia or not.

Okay, that's all I'm informing you of today. Those are even more important Wikipedia policies than the first set I introduced you to. I didn't introduce you to those first because the others (the first set) seemed more important for you to know at that time. You can always contact me on my talk page or through email if you need help on anything with Wikipedia. See you later. Flyer22 (talk) 01:15, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ThanksGlo145 (talk) 01:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. And I did what you requested for a reference, though you weren't that off, for those types of references. When a reference you give is not one located on the internet, that's the best way to format it. It's definitely easier to format than the ones of formatting to the internet. Flyer22 (talk) 02:23, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Soap opera character infobox

[edit]

Glo, since we're not placing the family and relationships of soap opera characters (or any fictional character, really) at the bottom of their articles anymore, and that stuff belongs in their character infobox, it would be great if you could help out with that. For what I mean on this exactly, it has been discussed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas on its talk page, as seen in this link. You can weigh in with your thoughts on this matter as well. You've probably already noticed the elimination of the family and relationships sections from the bottom of these articles. I've already done this to the Sam McCall article, but I don't edit the General Hospital-related articles that much. Your help, especially with the characters from that show on this matter, would be much appreciated. Thanks. Flyer22 02:37, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay did that on several including Bobbie Spencer, Katherine Bell, Skye Chandler, and others. Glo145 (talk) 03:53, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for the help, Glo. Flyer22 (talk) 06:46, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also, remember to remove the lists from the bottom of these articles once you place that information that was there in their character infoboxes instead. Flyer22 (talk) 06:53, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, it's apparent that you remember to do that. You just didn't do that for the Katherine Bell article, but I took care of that. Flyer22 (talk) 06:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

I combined both references to get a cohesive statement that has real world references. Thank you for finding the information you did and for contributing to the keep debate for Abe Carver. Any help you can give with nominated articles for deletion is appreciated. CelticGreen (talk) 02:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. I knew those old TV Guide articles would come in handy one day.Glo145 02:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AMC

[edit]

People keep messing with the cast list and I really don't know what's going on who is on, who is gone, etc. Could you look at it. I trust you to fix it correctly whereas I don't trust these random IP users that live to mess with the pages. Thanks KellyAna (talk) 18:00, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe its correct, Flyer is more adept at these things than me, but people do change it randomly for no reason. Glo145 (talk) 18
55, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


Edit summaries

[edit]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. KellyAna (talk) 19:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Welcome

[edit]
Welcome!

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
  • Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!
  • Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films January 2008 Newsletter

[edit]

The January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of temporary injunction

[edit]

Hi Glo145, I noticed you added a notability tag to an article about a television character [1] , and I am letting you know that there is currently a temporary injunction that applies to all editors[2] while this arbitration case is open. The injunction was enacted on February 3, 2008 and it reads:

"For the duration of this case, no editor shall redirect or delete any currently existing article regarding a television series episode or character; nor un-redirect or un-delete any currently redirected or deleted article on such a topic, nor apply or remove a tag related to notability to such an article. Administrators are authorized to revert such changes on sight, and to block any editors that persist in making them after being warned of this injunction."

The arbitration committee would like all editors to hold off on such actions while the case is open. I will also notify you when the injunction ends. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 05:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Glo145 ~ the "notice of injunction" doesn't prohibit adding the tag you added. The point of your tag is to get others to expand the article. Feel free to ignore this over zealous warning. Your tag doesn't say "delete" it says "expand." Keep up the good work. KellyAna (talk) 04:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Well, I did place a notability tag on the article but I also nominated it for deletion, because it has no notability. But oh well, I gues it'll have to wait. Glo145 (talk) 01:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films February 2008 Newsletter

[edit]

The February 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

End of the temporary injunction

[edit]

The arbitration committee have reached a decision in this arbitration case and the temporary injunction related to television episode articles and television character articles has now ended. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 02:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films coordinator elections

[edit]

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films March 2008 Newsletter

[edit]

The March 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films April 2008 Newsletter

[edit]

The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:04, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films May 2008 Newsletter

[edit]

The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:58, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still interested in daytime serials?

[edit]

If u r, let me know. What sparks your interest (writers, producers, characters, actors, directors, network executives)? In the meantime, here are a few proposals: Steven Williford [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]

Angela Tessinari ([12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18])

Lorin Wertheimer [19]

Shelly Moore [20]: Wrote for Newhart, Misfits of Science, Beauty And The Beast, Shadowchasers, Hawkeye, Days Of Our Lives (1985-1989), Dark Shadows (Executive Story Editor: 1991), Sunset Beach (1997) & General Hospital (1998-2004). Since 1984, her writing parnter has been Linda Campanelli. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.105.138 (talk) 04:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films June 2008 Newsletter

[edit]

The June 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films July 2008 Newsletter

[edit]

The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections

[edit]

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

[edit]

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Questionnaire

[edit]

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:41, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Glo145! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 710 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Deborah Blackwell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Brian Frons. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Farine (talk) 03:46, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will not put the word "controversial" back on the page, but it is absolutely true that he is controversial. I am hardly the only one to share that opinion. Glo145 (talk) 20:06, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

[edit]

I see that you haven't made any edits for over a month now. I hope it's not because of the notice I've left above on your talk page. Please be insured that my intent was never to cause you any harm if this is what has indeed happened.

We all have opinions and that's fine. But we should keep them to ourselves when editing Wikipedia articles, especially when dealing with an article about a living person.

Of course you can disregard this message if your decision to not editing for this long doesn't have anything to do with me. But in any case, we all hope to see you again on Wikipedia. Regards. Farine (talk) 04:41, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maria Arena Bell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lauren Baldwin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terrence O'Brien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Chris Murphy and Ron Johnson
United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ron Johnson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States House Committee on Education and the Workforce, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Tierney, Tom Price and Joe Courtney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

help: Bud Kloss (AMC's 1st EP)

[edit]

Bud Kloss (b. Longview, Texas) is an American television producer.

Personal Life: When he was 14 years old, Kloss heard the bombs drop on Pearl Harbor. He served in the U.S. Army in WWII. [21]

Education: After his service, he graduated from the University of Texas and Yale School of Drama.

TV Career: He started out producing and directing network sports and news programs. His credits include All My Children (Executive Producer; hired by president of ABC Daytime to work with Agnes Nixon; 1970-1978), and NBC Daytime's Texas (1980-1982).

He convinced Susan Lucci to audition for the role of Erica Kane as well as Tara Martin according to Lucci's All My Life memoir.

Awards & Nominations: He has been nominated four times at the Daytime Emmys.

Sources: [22] [23] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.9.177 (talk) 18:30, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbara Boxer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Chiang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:54, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Glo145. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Jews in sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noah Rubin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Glo145. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the Second Avenue Subway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hanover Square (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jack Sock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Auckland Open (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I made the same mistake!

[edit]

Jim Hagedorn doesn't seem that it would be that common of a name, but I guess there are at least two of them! Marquardtika (talk) 02:34, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Glo145. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi there,


I hope this message finds you well! My name is Scott, and I work with a project called SCALES, out of Northwestern University (https://scales-okn.org). We recently received a grant from the National Science Foundation to create a national resource for enabling access to court records and increasing the transparency of the justice system. Here's a paper we published recently in Science discussing the goals of our project, as well as an introductory video.

As you've contributed to the US courts and judges WikiProject, I wanted to reach out and inquire into how this SCALES corpus might be useful to you as an editor. We have a great deal of data and metadata about judges & lawyers in the federal court system that could improve lots of stubs and B-/C-class articles (something I'm personally excited about, since in my brief teenage Wikipedia-editing heyday I was often drawn to working with stubs and new articles). And in general, I think the SCALES platform will be a powerful tool for empowering citizens to understand the judiciary and its impact on the country, a priority I know many of us share in this topic space.

Let me know if you're interested in talking further and helping us understand how we can work with you. Thanks for your time!


All best,

Scott —Preceding undated comment added 18:19, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Jean Arley has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Andumé (talk) 19:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Jean Arley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has a career, but no evidence of meeting WP:ENT / WP:GNG. Unref blp.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 09:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]