User talk:Goodshoped35110s/Archive 4

Hmm...[edit]

This might help with the investigation. Wd3000 says he lives in Barenberg. I don't know which state or country that's in, but wherever it is, he lives there.--Gp75motorsports 10:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I remember hearing that User:RickK lives somewhere in Southern California or San Francisco Bay Area. --Goodsh oped3 511 0s 02:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: User talk:Ksero#Your edits to User:Wd3000[edit]

Yes, I did welcome that user, but I don't know anything more about him or her. Sorry I can't be of more help... — Ksero 12:02, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK, because I've been hearing rumors from the user above. I don't think these two users are connected anyway, if they are, then it would be exciting. --Goodsh oped3 511 0s 02:41, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof![edit]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Goodshoped35110s! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. β^_command 05:16, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! -Go od sh o p 05:17, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How to join[edit]

All you have to do to join is add your name to the members' list If you want, you can also add the official userbox by typing {{User:Gp7motorsports/Userboxes/Wikipedia Users' Alliance}} on your page. I can't wait to see your name on the members' page! Best, --Gp75motorsports 15:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About RickK and wd[edit]

I verified this by going to his contribs page and clicking "Show edits of new accounts only". I hope this is good enough; it still may need some deeper verification first.--Gp75motorsports 16:30, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Helpme:Where's my Signpost spam?![edit]

Hello. I would like to know when I signed up for Signpost, I didn't get it. Why? -Go od sh o p 20:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Goodshoped :) The Signpost comes out weekly, and I saw that you signed up for it after its most recent issue. So, you signed up a bit too late to get the last issue, but you will get the next issue (October 22). Happy editing, ( ar ky ) 20:52, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -Go od sh o p 23:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WUA[edit]

Greetings friend, I am Greenwood1010 one of the co-founders of the WUA and former 1st Vice-Chairman, 2nd Chairman and 4th Vice-Chairman. Of course we did away with those silly postions. Any how welcome to the WUA great to have you. I have added your name to the list of offical members. Also if you want to speak with other members check out User: King of Nepal, he is the one who came up with the whole idea. --Greenwood1010 22:26, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -Go od sh o p 23:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Temp-plate[edit]

thanks for your offer to help? Claraparks 23:34, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Now, the template can be found at: {{User:Goodshoped35110s/Welcome Template}}.. If you desire to warn ips and welcoming them, put either [[Image:Information.svg|25px]], [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|32px]], [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|32px]], then add your warning for vandalism, then put thank you, and the template. Go get it! See you at the welcoming! -Go od sh o p 23:38, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you kindly[edit]

Claraparks 23:45, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. You know, you could have just edited the section above and reply by doing this:

comment

reply

reply reply

reply reply reply

reply reply reply reply

-Go od sh o p 23:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And if you want a better sig than that, I can help. I know someone that does that. -Go od sh o p 23:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Claraparks has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

And the debate...[edit]

In case you haven't heard, there's a debate going on as to the merger of the CVU and the WUA (meaning the CVU moves us into their namespace to avoid our deletion). I need some backup on it. I was hoping you'd be willing to help? Best and thanks, --Gp75motorsports 01:26, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on it. What do you want me to do? E me on that. -Go od sh o p 01:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What I want you to do[edit]

I want you to just tell them the things that stand out about this project compared to others. Apparently they think it's redundant. Best and thanks, --Gp75motorsports 01:36, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. -Go od sh o p 01:38, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it up![edit]

You tell 'em, man! --Gp75motorsports 01:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

YEAH! -Go od sh o p 01:45, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to User:Kurykh[edit]

It was deleted for a reason. Please do not recreate it again. Thanks. --71.141.117.207 02:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, I find it unwise to broadcast rumors, especially unconfirmed ones. You might only end up creating unnecessary drama. --71.141.117.207 02:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. And that's true. I created those redirects because your old sig still existed on the other talkpages, so I took the liberty of redirecting them. If you want me to nominate them for deletion, OK. And besides, they know RickK isn't back. -Go od sh o p 02:41, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check this out![edit]

See the comment Greenwood made in the debate. Tell me he didn't hit it head-on!!! --Gp75motorsports 02:36, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dang, what a very big description. By the way, what happened to the other party? I think they withdrawed. -Go od sh o p 02:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I NEED YOU NOW[edit]

THIS IS URGENT. WE HAVE BEEN NOMINATED FOR DELETION. LONG LIVE THE WUA, --Gp75motorsports 03:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC) :I've said what I can. -Go od sh o p 04:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, one more thing: Good luck.

Goodbye[edit]

I sadly :( have to go...but i will be back on monday around 10 am...hopefully on sunday. I shall pray to Loed Buddha that all goes well. Good luck--Greenwood1010 03:50, 21 October 2007 (UTC) as for the king of nepal, the 4th member, he is currenty in the kingdom of bhutan...he is a fellow buddhist and is on vaction there so he most likely will not responed for a while[reply]

I'm always here Monday-Friday 5PM PST to 10PM PST, and Weekends at the same time. -Go od sh o p 04:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

about edit summaries[edit]

Hi and thanks for the info about edit summaries. I dont understand what you mean by WP:U? Oh, I can't do an edit summary here...whats with that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Law & Disorder (talk • contribs) 05:20, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. You can do an edit summary. It's just that, what does your username mean? E-mail me, do not talk to me here or something bad will happen. -Go od sh o p 01:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RickK notice[edit]

While I can appreciate the sentiment, could you please remove the notice about your suspicion of RickK having returned from your userpage? One of the two rights Wikipedians have is the right to vanish. This right should be respected. Happy editing to you! Keegan^talk

I know that. In fact, I know he has the right to leave. It may have been someone who is obsessed with this person. -Go od sh o p 01:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 38 Geary[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, 38 Geary, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/38 Geary. Thank you. Kurykh 18:37, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK... and I'm pretty sure you're doing this because of a reason. -Go od sh o p 01:01, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{Muni-stub}}[edit]

Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 00:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, and I already placed a {{hangon}} template on the page. Cheers! -Go od sh o p 01:01, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talkheader message[edit]

You'd better go to User talk:Coredesat with that message you left on my talk page; I don't think he/she noticed it. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Index•Sign) 06:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let him know. --Core desat 06:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT? -Go od sh op ed 06:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, OK. And can you restore my work desk? It has absolutely nothing to do with the WuA. -Go od sh op ed 06:23, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm rather confused. --FastLizard4 (Talk•Index•Sign) 06:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, some posse has been deleting some of my pages, and my user talk template. I'll try to come up with a simplified version of the template without having to overwhelm, but, oh well. I mean, I'm already stressed out because of the messages I got above... -Go od sh op ed 06:27, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"some posse" would be a group of administrators that are concerned that your views of what Wikipedia is for is not quite in line with what Wikipedia's actual purpose is. Worry less about your user talk header and more about improving the encyclopedia. EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message on your talk page. -Go od sh op ed 06:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"nothing to do"?... *points to backlog* Spebi 06:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, seriously. If you've got that much free time, I can point you to plenty of crap that you can do. GlassCobra 06:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Thanks! I'll watch them and get started on them tomorrow. *yawn* Good night. -Go od sh op ed 06:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:SuggestBot Marlith ^T/C 00:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I sent a request, and haven't gotten anything back from him yet. -Go od sh op ed 04:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It'll take a week. I hope what he gives interests you. Marlith ^T/C 04:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And SuggestBot is not a "Him". He is just a computer program. Where are you? The Matrix? Marlith ^T/C 04:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't typing carefully. Later, I'm going to try to clear the WP:RAY? backlog. -Go od sh op ed 04:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your deletion[edit]

You are deleting the explanaion of why I have posted this here. It is relevant. Please do not revert it. There is a debate about that this story should be on ANI, and the story of JzG moving it there is part of it. Thnx. 85.5.180.9 05:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 49	3 December 2007	About the Signpost

Signpost interview: New Executive Director Sue Gardner	Arbitration Committee elections: Elections open
Possible license migration sparks debate	Featured articles director names deputy
Software bug fixed, overuse of parser function curtailed	WikiWorld comic: "Wordplay"
News and notes: Wikipedian honored, fundraiser, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
WikiProject Report: LGBT studies	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don Imus/ Accusations of Defamatory speech[edit]

"So if he did? They already mention it in the article.. "

But the description of those "politically incorrect remarks" suggests that all the comments listed were made on-air in a shock jock manner, which is not the case. I was simply clarifying that point because it's misleading as it is now. The information I added was accurate and should not be removed.JacksonBR 05:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, but we've gotten quite a bit of vandalism on the page, including this several days ago. -Go od sh op ed 04:19, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Qubo Article[edit]

http://qubo.com/channel/ This is where I got this source from and the line-ups. They started changing this line-up since Monday, December 3, 2007. I started using Wikipedia a few months ago and I do not know how to cite my sources using codes like this: [1]. This is not a 4 hour show anymore, now it expanded to 6 hours of their favorite television show. Miss BG is a new show on 24/7 Digital Network that came out this week. I know you did not believe me with the changes that I made, it is just that one person who edited it deleted my source because it was a repeat of the source that person had already pasted on the website.

They added:

Postman Pat Babar Miss BG and Jacob Two-Two to the 24/7 Digital Network.

The lineup has been changed.

I apologized for not citing where I got the information from. I am new with this and I have not have a chance to learn how people cited their source. The NBC Qubo schedule stays the same. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbears22 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PWH[edit]

I appreciate the thought, but ArbCom isn't the right place to address the PWH vandal. A bunch of us have been trying to address the vandal. WP:SSP is the correct place for issues like this. Dreadstar † 04:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll try to file a report. And the Long-term abuse page is up, if you're interested. -Go od sh op ed 04:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there's a need for a report. The socks have been confirmed and it's a battle that many admins are working on. Dreadstar † 04:50, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So...? -Go od sh op ed 05:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First, read through WP:DENY and WP:DFTT. The ANI report is intersting, since all the socks have been banned. How to stop from creating more socks. Do you have a WP:CHECKUSER in? I sent you an email too. Dreadstar † 05:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We did a checkuser. We got the IPs blocked. He still comes back. -Go od sh op ed 05:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So how are you going to ban him? Dreadstar † 05:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing else we can do, besides keep blocking him. The LTA report is fine (though not on its own page), but obviously ArbCom is an incorrect move. LTA will alert other editors that he's a problem user, and we can let them know to revert and block on sight. Don't freak out about this, okay? GlassCobra 05:16, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(undent)OK. I'll go look for him right now... (hands GlassCobra and Dreadstar a semi-automatic rifle) -Go od sh op ed 05:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Herman[edit]

Hi, there's an ANI topic you may want to comment on. I proposed to ban the Herman vandal. Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 05:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Jetlover, and if you're an admin, and if you see him again, BLOCK HIM ON SIGHT! -Go od sh op ed 05:02, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin, but I'll go to AIV if I see him. I also nominated the LTA page for deletion, see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long term abuse/PWeeHurman. Feel free to comment. Thanks. Cheers,Je t Lover (Report a mistake) 05:08, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I just commented there. -Go od sh op ed 05:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And you can also take the name to UAA. -Go od sh op ed 05:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do that. UAA is for blatant violations of WP:U. AIV is the place to report sockpuppets of banned users. EVula // talk // ☯ // 05:24, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(undent) Well, the reason why I mentioned UAA is because it's similar to PWee's username. (hands all users on talk page a semi-automatic rifle) Anyway, I'm off hunting for him. -Go od sh op ed 05:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wish you'd quit saying that. We don't need any semi-automatic rifles to deal with a simple vandal who needs attention. It's kind of a weird thing to say, especially after the mall shootings today. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I offended you or anything, but it's just a figure of speech. -Go od sh op ed 06:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is it, right? -Go od sh op ed 06:04, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's it. You didn't offend me really, although I don't like guns. But it's probably not a good figure of speech to use around here under the best of circumstances, and especially not now. --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Alright. I'm off. I think it's best to protect the pages just in case if the vandals come up again. (Man, I need a bot for this) -Go od sh op ed 06:18, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the protection policy – we don't protect pre-emptively. If vandalism occurs, revert, block and ignore (as you've been told many times lately) and if it gets too hectic, you know where to go. Spebi 06:20, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UAA would still be an inappropriate place to report names that are close to PWeeHurman‎; the editor named himself off of a pre-existing character, so similarities wouldn't be blocked based on the similarity to the user, necessarily. Long story short: don't report socks to UAA, and don't try to side-step blocking users by nailing them on a technicality.
As for the semi-automatic rifles, why use guns when knives are so much cooler? ;) EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UT:GS3[edit]

Please don't create these nor link to them. Firstly, there's a long-standing consensus against them, and secondly "UT" isn't a psuedo-namespace so technically it's an "article" and hence is deleted as a crossnamespace redirect. Daniel 07:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks! -Go od sh op ed 01:20, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just so we're clear...[edit]

You may not place meatpuppet or sockpuppet tags on established editors' pages without concrete, substantial evidence that they abusing multiple accounts. You are grating on the community's last nerve. GlassCobra 03:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Ok. Thanks. -Go od sh op ed 03:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to ask: what made you think that this edit was a good idea?[1] Your edit history, as I've mentioned before, is extremely troublesome, and the very idea that you find it acceptable to tag an established user's page with a sockpuppet tag without any evidence to back it up is utterly extraordinary. EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know about my edit history, but that is not going to be solved anytime soon if I keep getting messages...*whoof* -Go od sh op ed 04:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your post[edit]

I assure you that I am not a sock of that user. If you still disagree, you can make a request for checkuser. But I'm leaving anyway, which was why I blanked my talk page; I do have a life outside of Wikipedia, and I'm requesting protection of my user and talk page, so I don't think there is any point in this suspected sockpuppet investigation.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. (talk) 04:04, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, you're leaving? Don't, man! Look, I apologize for putting the sock on that page, I got so worked up on that threat above GlassCobra's post, man! Don't leave! We need you! (Oh, great.) -Go od sh op ed 04:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry; my leaving has nothing to do with your post. As I said on Redux's talk page, I just don't want to have to worry about new messages, and I've been spending too much time on Wikipedia already. I don't want to worry about my account at all. There's no need to apolgize. And thank you for your kind words. I orginally left in September, but after that I realized that there were a few matters that haven't been resloved. I'm now leaving for good, but not related to conflicts or stress. Thanks for explaining the sockpuppet post.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, me too. But there have already been two attempts of me to leave Wikipedia, but I stayed because I would like to continue contributing here, and that dealing with vandals is somehow "fun". But if you have stress, take a WikiBreak! Relax for a few months or weeks, then come back when you are ready. Best, -Go od sh op ed 04:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I too desperately need a WikiBreak. Wikipedia has eaten up my time for homework. Marlith ^T/C 04:25, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really have much homework, but I like using Wikipedia to fight the vandals and to improve the encyclopedia. -Go od sh op ed 04:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalisim[edit]

That was not vandalisim. It was just a normal user having questions about my reversion, and he placed it on the wrong page. Marlith ^T/C 04:13, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, OK. Apparently, I used the wrong rollback button. But anyway, I gave him a warning and asked him to put it on the talk. Sorry if it was an inconvenience. -Go od sh op ed 04:15, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

I've attempted before to catch your attention and ask that you change you behavior, for which I've seen very little in the way of positive contributions to the project. Your edit that tagged a respected editor as a sockpuppet[2] is out of order to a magnitude that words simply cannot express.

You have 48 hours to read over Wikipedia's various policies and to investigate the myriad methods to become a successful, constructive contributor; please use that time wisely. EVula // talk // ☯ // 04:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know. You've blocked me when I was editing this article, I was adding some refs. I do not intend to request being unblocked and wish to serve my term; however I feel that I need a rest from Wikipedia. -Go od sh op ed 04:47, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I-FBI[edit]

Jimbo Wales has made it clear on several occasions that threats like that, even if they do turn out to be jokes, should be taken seriously. For one thing, life may be at risk, and for another, they are crimes here just as much as in real life. As to pretending to be FBI, I didn't suggest that; what I would normally do is email the Foundation and ask them to contact the local police, having checked out the IP address. --Rodhullandemu (please reply here - contribs) 05:26, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Restore or...[edit]

I would, but unfortunately I'm not an admin. I also don't think Isotope would be willing to do it, for whatever reason. --Gp75motorsports (talk) 00:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean restoring the thing, I mean, you know. -Go od sh op ed 04:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. could you explain? --Gp75motorsports (talk) 02:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

AngelOfSadness talk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Cheers for the talkpage revert and for updating the vandalism count. It was very much appreciated :D AngelOfSadness talk 15:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cookie, but I'm leaving and not coming back. Apparently, no one wants me here. If anyone has any remorse, they can can it. I'm leaving and not coming back. -Go od sh op ed 04:26, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]