Jump to content

User talk:Grinchpiggy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Grinchpiggy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug Weller (talk) 05:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Grinchpiggy, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
The
Adventure
The Wikipedia Adventure guide

Hi Grinchpiggy!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:32, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

[edit]

This is beginning to look like spam. It's a self-published book with no discussion in what we call "reliable sources", see WP:RS, unlike the Tanners. Discuss it on the articles talk page or go to WP:RSN and make your argument that it meats WP:RS or if used as an external link WP:EL (which you need to discuss at WP:ELN. Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 06:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Reformed Egyptian shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Your first edit replaced material someone else had deleted, so is a revert Doug Weller (talk) 11:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grinchpiggy (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I had a work account and a home account, I was new to wikipedia and did not know you could not have two accounts and comment under both Grinchpiggy (talk) 04:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Now you have one account, which is Piccione1. Just stick to using that account and everything will be OK. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Grinchpiggy (talk) 04:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]