User talk:Grinchpiggy
Welcome!
|
Grinchpiggy, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]Hi Grinchpiggy!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
Please stop
[edit]This is beginning to look like spam. It's a self-published book with no discussion in what we call "reliable sources", see WP:RS, unlike the Tanners. Discuss it on the articles talk page or go to WP:RSN and make your argument that it meats WP:RS or if used as an external link WP:EL (which you need to discuss at WP:ELN. Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 06:15, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
[edit]Your recent editing history at Reformed Egyptian shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Your first edit replaced material someone else had deleted, so is a revert Doug Weller (talk) 11:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Piccione1 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC) |
Grinchpiggy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I had a work account and a home account, I was new to wikipedia and did not know you could not have two accounts and comment under both Grinchpiggy (talk) 04:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Now you have one account, which is Piccione1. Just stick to using that account and everything will be OK. Vanjagenije (talk) 12:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.