User talk:Guangzhong92

March 2023

Hello, I'm MagentaCat1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to New York criminal investigation of The Trump Organization have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. MagentaCat1 (talk) 06:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bangkok. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bangkok was changed by Guangzhong92 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951729 on 2023-03-31T06:17:01+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at New Market, Alabama. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MagentaCat1 (talk) 06:22, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sofia, you may be blocked from editing. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 06:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mohamed Bazoum. MagentaCat1 (talk) 06:38, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Human skin color, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BilCat (talk) 06:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN JTK. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:BilCat that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — CAPTAIN JTK (talk) 07:24, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you attempt to make unconstructive edits and trigger the edit filter again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — CAPTAIN JTK (talk) 07:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. — CAPTAIN JTK (talk) 07:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:46, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]