User talk:Haadaa

Image tagging for Image:Fashion net.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fashion net.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fashion net.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Fashion net.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wizardman 00:05, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fashion-net-mainpage-squircles-2016.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fashion-net-mainpage-squircles-2016.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. As you requested. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia conflict of interest policy

Hello, Haadaa. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 12:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Your recent editing history at Fashion Net shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Roxy the dog. bark 12:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Academy of Fashion Arts and Sciences

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Academy of Fashion Arts and Sciences, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Roxy the dog. bark 14:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Fashion Net. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 15:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about COI and other accounts?

Hi Haadaa. I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia. your edits to date are pretty much all about Stig Harder and the properties he created: Fashion Net, Lumière (magazine), International Academy of Fashion Arts and Sciences. Your edits are also very similar to those of Shousokutsuu, making it appear as though one person might be operating both accounts.

You have been given notice of the Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use above, but I don't see where a conversation actually took place, and hope you are willing to talk a bit.

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protected by our WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have some connection with Stig Harder or any of the properties you have worked on articles about? You can answer how ever you wish (giving personally identifying information or not), but if there is a connection, please disclose it.

Also, have you edited under other accounts here in Wikipedia? If so this is a violation of the WP:SOCK policy, but is no big deal if you disclose other accounts and just use one going forward.

After you respond to the two questions (and you can just reply below), perhaps we can talk about next steps. Please reply here - I am watching this page. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please reply here? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 01:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, so I tried to open a discussion with you here, just simply. It seems that you are upset based on what you are writing at COIN. I would like to explain the context to you but if you won't talk with me, I can't do that. Jytdog (talk) 15:30, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a role account per [1]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 19:41, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]