User talk:Hazaraboyz

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Hazara pioneers has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Work permit (talk) 03:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hazara Student Federation

A tag has been placed on Hazara Student Federation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Huadpe (talk) 17:11, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Hazara has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ♠ B.s.n. ♥R.N.contribs 16:08, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unlock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hazaraboyz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This request is made by me User: Hazaraboyz , to unblock me now and its not necessary to block me further because I have realized the problem and got understanding to Wikipedia's rule for editing. As I am block due to utilizing multiple accounts to circumvent Wikipedia policies, but now I have understood the polices and I promise to have good contribution in Wikipedia's free encyclopedia.

Explanation of Problem

As I have mentioned above that I was blocked due to utilizing multiple accounts to circumvent Wikipedia policies. but i also promise that I am not using two account for my help in article Hazara people. In the investigation User: Time Buddha are said to be my sock puppet. He/she has no involvement is this case but he is also blocked. For assuring that I always have good contribution in wikipedia here are some examples:

I have contribution in article Hazara people,

I have contribution in article Hazaragi language,

I have contribution in article Shaheed Hussain Ali Yousafi

I have created article Hazara Democratic Party

I have created article 106th Hazara Pioneers

I have created article Hazara town

I am the creator of WikiProject Hazara,

which is really created for the improvement of articles related to Hazaras, specially article Hazara people. :Now the situation is in front of you (mean administrators), whether you unblock me or not but I was always supposed to construct articles related to Hazaras as I have before, but also promise that I will continue my contribution whether you declined my unblock, as my unblock expires but my contribution will be constructive not destructive. The user which requested for blocking me is supporting me now, as he himself mentioned below. Thank you for the administrators reviews

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hazaraboyz for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Blueboy 96 19:56, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh once again I got another sockpuppet. Men, User: Tajik the one who request to block User:Nurbandma is doing evade with wikipedia Encyclopedia. I am not related to User: Nurbandma but I will favor him because we both were blocked when ever we want to create Hazara people articles. User Nurbandma has a great contribution in my project wikipedia: wikiProject Hazara. I am really appreciating him due to his contributions to Hazara people articles.

I am a Hazara not a tajik. When I joined wikipedia so I have only promise just to build Hazara people related articles. The User which request you for blocking me now trying to block Nurbandma because he has wonderful contribution for wikipedia. User: Tajik doesnot want anyone to build Hazara people article or related. He has blocked many user due to their contribution. This is not justice.

I request wikipedia's administrator to not block User: Nurbandma because he has no link with me and let him continue his contribution and give him chance to rebuild article related to Hazaras.

Sorry, but Checkuser confirms that Nurbandma is in fact, one of your socks. You are blocked indefinitely. Blueboy 96 21:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not correct men, it is not justice to block me indefinite. if you does not consider me so just consider my contribution to Wikipedia Encyclopedia. as I have mentioned above while requesting for unblock but no body answer me. I was using two account User:Hazaraboys and User:Hazaraboyz which are only one account I just transfer it to Hazaraboyz that was misunderstanding of administrator. I had not used both account at the same time to evade wikipedia's rule. this is not fair men. | - |azaraBoyz (talk) 17:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hazaraboyz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been doing sock puppetry but I will not do after this. I agree with my mistake and will contribute positively after you unblock me, I was doing sock puppetry because I was blocked by administrator and I have create some articles and then so I needed an accounts to do so, thats why I had created more then 1 account and with every account I had build the articles of related to Hazara people, * I have created wikipedia: wikiProject Hazara
* I have created article Hazara Democratic Party
and much more.... see my contribution list. Exactly, you would not believe my words now, but I will promise to have good contributions after this and incase I continued in damaging wikipedia's rule so block me indefinatly as I am now. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Per Blueboy96 below - We're not giving you a chance for a third strike. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 10:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please provide a list of all accounts that you have ever used. Sandstein 18:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly oppose unblocking--up to now, he has adamantly denied socking. The only remorse is that he's been caught--twice. Blueboy 96 21:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly I have been socking for many times and I accept that I was wrong, but I really need to do so, as with every accounts I have many contributions but at last I have been block for using multiple accounts no more abuses.

Here is the lists of accounts

1. HazaraBoys

I had created this account about 1 year before but later I forgot it, but now when I used wikipedia and start contributing by using user:HazaraBoyz account, one day I suddenly or accidental, I put letter (S) instead of (Z). The account open but I was impressed.

2. HazaraBoyz

The original account which I used to contribute and create many articles related to Hazara people, as mentioned in my above block review or you can see my contribution list or visit Hazara people article history

3. Nurbandma

The account used for socking and I had to do so, because I have to bring some changes to article related to Hazara people. With Nurbandma I had great contribution in wikipedia: wikiProject Hazara which create this project a professional one as compare to some other projects and which will have great roll in creating articles related to Hazara people so on.

These are the three accounts which I used in wikipedia for my contribution. with every accounts I had many contribution and create articles related to Hazara people.

I know I was wrong but I had to do so, because there are great mistakes in articles related to Hazara people, these mistake must be changed and there are many articles to be created, so I have to do many things in wikipedia. Today I need this service and I have to change or correct the mistake and have to create many article related to hazara people and they have be linked with each other for more attraction towards Hazara people.

These are my ambitions in wikipedia please unblock me and help me in doing the above works which must be done in order to show and tell others about Hazara people, which have been discriminated for many centuries. | - |azaraBoyz (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hazaraboyz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why I cannot be unblock, as I have discussed all the activities, I was not supposed to strike but really want to create and contribute here...

Decline reason:

Unless you can convince me that you deserve another chance, I'm afraid you won't be unblocked. What edits do you plan to make if you were to be unblocked? \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 03:21, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A

Salam Backslash,

Exectly as I mentioned above that there are many article to be created in wikipedia related to Hazara people, As I counted that the total number of article about hazara history culture and tradition is 22 only. There are many personalities, as

1. Shaheed Syed Ismail Balkhi (Hazara poet and the one who start revolution of Shiite in Afghanistan)

2. Shaheed Ibrahim Hazara ( Hazara student Federation Leader in Pakistan)

3. Abdul Ali Mazari (Hazaras father of Nation)

4. Abdul Khaliq Hazara (Hazara politician in Pakistan)

5. Sardar Yazdan Khan (Hazara tribal leader in Pakistan)>br>

6. Shafee Dewana ( Hazara brave soldier during Afghan soviet union war )

7. Tanzeem-e-Nasl-e-Nau Hazara Moghol (Hazara welfare organization) 8. Hazara people article (Must be accurate) 9. Hazaragi language (Changes should be brought) 10. District of Hazarajat or Hazaristan(Center parts of Afghanistan) 11. Hazara people in Pakistan ( Hazaras that live in Pakistan) and many more......

There are many personalities which has not been nominated in Wikipedia and there are lots of article about history and culture of hazara people which have not been created. I prefer you to read once the article about Hazara people. Every period have a full story and description. The day they were persecuted and subjected by kings till the day we created our identity. There are many things to be written about Hazara people, about the wars and confusion created among Hazaras.

Articles must be wrote in Hazaragi language, inorder to create a Hazaragi wikipedia. as I have I ready requested. Hazara people article must be protected because any body can change it and revert it without any discussion or references. Hazaragi language article must be edited in full language form and should be contribution for completing it.

I think I may not be deserve to be given the third chance but I have to be unblock because there are many things about Hazara people to be written in wikipedia as it is a free encyclopedia.

| - |azaraBoyz (talk) 18:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not convinced you deserve a third chance, given your history of sockpuppetry. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 20:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please Backslash forwardslash what reference should I give to you in order to convince you, I have told what you and other administrator all the activities I did in wikipedia, for you convince please check my each sockpuppet Account and see If any of them had done something wrong or disturb free wikipedia. Check

Please backslash do understand, I agree I was wrong and it was only due to being new with wikipedia. The day I start searching wikipedia till today I have contribute some things whether it is my original account or other sockpuppet accounts. You are the Judge and you have to bring justice.

I cannot force you to unblock me, this will be my last reply and believe my I was not here to be sockpuppet or create disturbance at wikipedia. Your judge you have the justice.

Thank a lot for the review and please this time what ever you do please please think about it and make a final decision. I will wait for the answer and hope you do justice with me and right one with me.

Thank you

Hazaraboyz

| - |azaraBoyz (talk) 13:22, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheHazaraBoy

At least one of the socks, namely User:TheHazaraBoy, was created by User:ScienceGolfFanatic, not HazaraBoys. That can be seen by looking at this page, which shows accounts created by User:The colour of shìt is orange, which is a checkuser-confirmed sock of ScienceGolfFanatic, and which shows behavior typical of ScienceGolfFanatic even apart from the checkuser evidence. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 17:39, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some confusion may have resulted during the SPI because TheHazaraBoy disrupted that SPI by blanking it, which is something that one might expect the true sockmaster to do. I suspect that SGF and HazaraBoyz may know each other in person and this could lead to false positives on checkuser reports. I am not saying that HazaraBoyz is innocent of all wrongdoing, only that at least some of the evidence seems to have been planted by ScienceGolfFanatic, part of a series of exploits to get already blocked users even deeper in trouble. I'll wait for a reply by Hazaraboyz (if he is still here) before I feel sure of anything, though. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 20:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mr. SOap:

At least you determine the reality, I agree I have been wrongdoing and creating sock puppets but there were some user which were also added to my sock puppets and the case became more serious, User:Time Buddha is not one of my sock puppet due to which I was firstly blocked from editing. I does not emphasis to unblock this user, you should not think he has written for himself. I have no link with him, You can check by check user, as the same case User:TheHazaraBoy, I have no link but they might also doing socking. The accounts I have been linked to is already mentioned above and you can check by each account I have contributed to article related to Hazara people.

User:Time Buddha was the first user due to which I was blocked at the first time by the request of User:Tajik. which is totally not justice and not accurate please check it.

User:TheHazaraBoy was the second user due to which I was blocked for the second time and the administrator took a deep concentration on me and blocked the account I had created and the others account. I have no link to this person, It might exist and for the privacy of Wikipedia I suggest administrator to keep them blocked and request administrator please at least removed it from my list of sockpuppets.

If the check User can determine who are the sockpuppets so why it report wrongly against my ability and my contribution. I have not been sock puppeting for the first time but this wrong decision compel me to create more account. Check it here the SPI

I must be unblock, now I got my case I will request from administrator to take a clear decission I have been declared sock puppetry by force at first, and the reason for the other sock puppetry of my own account is also the administrator as they wrongely report against me, I would not be block for the second if User:TheHazaraBoy was not included to my list by administrator and compel them to take my block seriously.

I want Justice, want justice, The whole decisions taken for me and declaring me as doing sock puppetry is reported wrongely against me

Thank you. | - |azaraBoyz (talk) 03:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hazaraboyz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The administrators claimed that the account which was called my sock puppets is not related to me, It was not also. Full description is mentioned above. Administrator should take serious action against such block. I request administrator to review my infinite block very carefully

Decline reason:

That one account was misidentified as a sockpuppet of yours does not absolve you of all of the other accounts you have used inappropriately, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hazaraboyz/Archive. Jayron32 04:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for one more chance:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hazaraboyz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to request one more chance in order to prove what I am was said above is absolutely correct. This time I won't do any sock puppetry again.

Decline reason:

You said that the last time. MuZemike 20:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I believe that due to the serious nature of your offense (sockpuppetry), you will have a hard time convincing others of your altruistic intentions. However, I will support your unblocking. Deadkord (talk) 00:03, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Deadkord, what should I have to do, in order to convince them for unblocking me. I know what I did, but that was only due to being new in wikipedia. I had just started contributing and then making some mistake took me to this way. Sorry

14:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC) I have not understand why you declined the unblock request MuZemike? Could you explain please.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hazaraboyz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why I am not unblock for my sockpupetry. i have been requesting for three months. Its enough and let me build my related article. Please. My project for Hazara people related articles has also been deleted. what is going on. Please do me some favor. all the description is written above

Decline reason:

Take a read of WP:OFFER and understand that every time you edit Wikipedia during that "break", you reset the clock. Note also, if/when you return, there is not such thing as YOUR article - read WP:OWN while you're off. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:26, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:Hazara pioneer badge.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hazara pioneer badge.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY ^(TALK) 21:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:HSF flag.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HSF flag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --something lame from CBW 08:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hazaraboyz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been block due to using multiple account and this block duration has exceeded 6 -7 months. 2= I have request many time to unblock me. 3= Please unblock me now 4= Now I am known to wikipedia very well and I know the rules and regulations.

Decline reason:

The standard offer is just advice, we don't have to unblock you just because you have been blocked for six months. That you have requested unblock before and been denied weakens the case for unblocking you now, not the other way around. It's all well and good to say you understand, what we need to see from you is a clear explanation in your own words of what you did to get blocked, why it was not acceptable, and how you would behave in the future if unblocked. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:20, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

hello beeblebrox: I was busy in creating article related to [Hazara peoplep] of [Afghanistan], [Pakistan] and other countries. I have also created many articles and added more details in [Hazara people| Hazaras] related articles. The most important work I did was creating a wikiProject for the [Hazara people] which will gather all Hazara users and might get even more users for the wikipedia. see the above request I have written full explanation of the article I created. When I was doing so, I user: Tajik appeared and always tried to oppose me of the changes I made in article related to Hazara people. He reverted my many edits in such articles. I informed him but he didnot listen to me. when he continued his reverting my edits in the article I had contribution. I used some harmful word for him in his Talk page. later on one administrator blocked me and then they found me of using multiple acount which had created very 2 year ago. I forgeted that ID so I created the second ID. After the blocking, I created a username with the name of NURBANDMA. which was also recognized and was blocked. My wikiproject has also been removed but an administrator. And now I am indefinet blocked.

This was the full explanation of the story when I was blocked till now. | - |azaraBoyz (talk) 04:22, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:SubadarGirdAli.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:SubadarGirdAli.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:09, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hazaraboyz for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Facts, not fiction (talk) 19:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hazara Student Federation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hazara Student Federation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazara Student Federation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 09:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Hazara

Template:WikiProject Hazara has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:49, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPHazara-award

Template:WPHazara-award has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPHazara-invite

Template:WPHazara-invite has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]