User talk:Hlakungpui

Nomination of Mizo Hlakungpui Mual for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mizo Hlakungpui Mual is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mizo Hlakungpui Mual until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Image marked for deletion - please supply copyright tag

Hi, your image Hlakungpui is at risk of deletion because you forgot to add its copyright and license. Either go to the image and put in the information 'by hand', or, and you might find this easier, upload the image again, with a new name, directly to Wikimedia Commons (i.e. NOT to Wikipedia as such) at Wikimedia Commons Upload Wizard where you just have to say 'I created this image' and it will put in the information for you. Then you can use the new image without trouble in the Wikipedia article. Good luck and thank you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

This is dangerous advice. Let me add a correction: you may go to Commons and re-upload the file saying "I created this image", if you indeed did create this image. If you didn't, you must not re-upload it, and the present version will be deleted. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:12, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

No indeed. However the user is undoubtedly from the area, so it is very likely that they do indeed own the photograph. Assuming good faith, I suspect that the user managed to upload an image but was flummoxed by the rest of the process: which is why I suggested the wizard, which goes some way to solving the problem. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Unspecified source for File:Lalzuithanga.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lalzuithanga.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --Rcsprinter (state) 17:34, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Kaphleia.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Kaphleia.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Kaphleia.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Kaphleia.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Kaphleia.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Kaphleia.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Kaphleia.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:41, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:L.Biakliana.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:L.Biakliana.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:L.Biakliana.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:L.Biakliana.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:L.Biakliana.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:L.Biakliana.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:L.Biakliana.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:41, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Mizo Hlakungpui Mual Article needs Citations

This article is currently very strong on details of poets, but very weak indeed on evidence. Wikipedia articles rely on evidence in the form of references to published documents from newspapers, magazines, websites and so on. The article is under direct and immediate threat of deletion as it is at "Articles for Deletion". The current work you are doing on providing empty hatnotes, minor details of poets, etc, is not addressing the basic lack of evidence. Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability to gain an understanding of what is needed. I will try to help you where I can, please feel free to ask if there's anything I can do. But it's really a total waste of time working on the article other than by adding citations at the moment - if the article is deleted you will have nothing to work on. Much the same applies to the images you have added - they will all be gone very soon unless you sort out the copyright problems. With best wishes Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:08, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

By the way, there is no point deleting the AfD header from the article. That will not stop the deletion process - you can see for yourself if you follow the link in the header to the AfD. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

More information needed about File:Capt. C.Khuma.jpg

Hello, Hlakungpui!

It was really helpful of you to upload File:Capt. C.Khuma.jpg, but in order to keep new images, we need to know their exact source and copyright status.

If you can edit the description page and add that information, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Mizo Hlakungpui Mual, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Church and Mizo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Mizo Heritage

Template:Infobox Mizo Heritage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Bulbophyllum hlakungpuii for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bulbophyllum hlakungpuii is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulbophyllum hlakungpuii until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 16:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

To understand the reason, please read Wikipedia's important policies

• WP:Verifiability: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source"
• WP:No original research which includes: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to premiere such a discovery."

JohnCD (talk) 20:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Bulbophyllum hlakungpuii. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  09:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Bulbophyllum hlakungpuii, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bug and Stem (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Bulbophyllum hlakungpuii. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 14:46, 4 April 2012 (UTC)