User talk:Jahviraa9

Welcome!

Hi Jahviraa9! I noticed your contributions to Giyani and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 13:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for welcome! Jahviraa9 (talk) 17:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please allow me to create a new account create a new account per WP: CLEANSTART I wish to editing on Wikipedia.

No. You are not eligible for WP:CLEANSTART. --Yamla (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as James J. Rowley Training Center. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 02:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Niranjan Peethadheeshwar Shree Shree 1008 Acharya Mahamandaleshwar Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji Maharaj

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Niranjan Peethadheeshwar Shree Shree 1008 Acharya Mahamandaleshwar Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji Maharaj, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A01:4C8:64:7ECA:792E:436A:4DF0:3781 (talk) 08:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Niranjan Peethadheeshwar Shree Shree 1008 Acharya Mahamandaleshwar Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji Maharaj moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Niranjan Peethadheeshwar Shree Shree 1008 Acharya Mahamandaleshwar Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji Maharaj, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:36, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I had make corrections, I also wants to change its title but it is not changing, kindly allow me to change it's title "Acharya Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji". This is new Title I want to replace. Jahviraa9 (talk) 11:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Jahviraa9! Your additions to Sweet Leaf Tea Company have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niranjan Peethadheeshwar Shree Shree 1008 Acharya Mahamandaleshwar Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji Maharaj (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Akevsharma were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niranjan Peethadheeshwar Shree Shree 1008 Acharya Mahamandaleshwar Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji Maharaj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 05:40, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jahviraa9! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 05:40, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:28, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 16:16, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Jahviraa9. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Star Mississippi 16:17, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamea Tus Salehat, Rampur

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jamea Tus Salehat, Rampur, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of http://jamea-tus-salehat.com/academic.htm. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Star Mississippi 23:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Jahviraa9! Your additions to The Children's Museum Jordan have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. You copied directly from this source which is not allowed. This is not the only edit that has had this issue. Please stop or you will be blocked Thank you. Star Mississippi 23:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning, ¢ The part of the History section is copied from the http://www.krastogidas.lt/ web page, a public domain resource. is insufficient and there is no indication that site is actually in the public domain. If you continue, you will be blocked. Star Mississippi 18:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 22:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned multiple times, and continue to violate copyright as there's no indication this information is in the public domain, as you asserted. Star Mississippi 22:47, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jahviraa9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry for my act, I will be careful in my future will not repeat that type of actions. Please unblock me this timeStar Mississippi 15:06, 19 February 2023 (UTC) Jahviraa9 (talk) 15:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We will need more than your promise. As copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, we must be convinced that you know what copyright is, what Wikipedia's license is, and when and how copyrighted content can be used on Wikipedia, in order to unblock you. 331dot (talk) 15:34, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jahviraa9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now I have carefully read and understand how to use Wikipedia's non-free content policies, I will take prior permission, and ask for the author's permission letter or email that mentioned his/her permission regarding copyright contents. Please unblock me!

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

What is copyright?
How is Wikipedia licensed?
Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 20:24, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jahviraa9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My answers are as follows: 1- Copyright is a legal right owned by the original creator, it gives the right to the original creator to reproduce, reprint, or republish his/her work multiple times, and it also protects against misuse of his/her work. 2- All the Wikipedia articles come under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike 3.0 unported Licence (CC BY-SA)and the GFDL. 3- Wikipedia headquarters based in San Fransisco, CA, USA, covers by the US copyright law, it can't overcome the US copyright law, so it doesn't allow any article that has copyright issues. 4- A person can use limited portions of a copyrighted article in the form of quotes for commentary, criticism, news reporting, and preparing scholarly reports, it should ("") and be inline cited properly. 5- If I will used any copyrighted content on Wikipedia, I will take the author's prior written permission before reusing his/her work on this platform. Hopefully, you unblock me

Decline reason:

Your answers to 4 and 5 are not generally correct. 4 is close, but "news reporting" is not relevant here and you missed non-textual material. Your answer to number 5 is essentially nonsense. I'll note also that Wikipedia servers are in more than just San Francisco, though their specific location isn't particularly relevant. You are free to make a new unblock request, correcting your mistakes, and another admin will review your answers. Yamla (talk) 12:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jahviraa9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My answers are as follows: 1- Copyright is a legal right owned by the original creator, it gives the right to the original creator to reproduce, reprint, or republish his/her work multiple times, and it also protects against misuse of his/her work. 2- All the Wikipedia articles come under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike 3.0 unported Licence (CC BY-SA)and the GFDL. 3- Wikipedia servers are based in the USA and are covered by the US copyright law, it can't overcome the US copyright law, so it doesn't allow any article that has copyright issues. 4- A person can use limited portions of a copyrighted article in the form of quotes for commentary, criticism, and preparing scholarly reports, it should ("") and be inline cited properly. 5- I will not use any copyrighted content on Wikipedia, as it is a violation of Wikipedia. Please unblock me!

Decline reason:

No response to query below in over a month. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:09, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{My answers are as follows: 1- Copyright is a legal right owned by the original creator, it gives the right to the original creator to reproduce, reprint, or republish his/her work multiple times, and it also protects against misuse of his/her work. 2- All the Wikipedia articles come under the Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike 3.0 unported Licence (CC BY-SA)and the GFDL. 3- Wikipedia servers are based in the USA and are covered by the US copyright law, it can't overcome the US copyright law, so it doesn't allow any article that has copyright issues. 4- A person can use copyrighted content having written permission of the author and properly attribute the content, limited portions of a copyrighted article in the form of quotes for commentary, criticism, and preparing scholarly reports, it should ("") and be inline cited properly. 5- I will not use any copyrighted content on Wikipedia, as it is a violation of Wikipedia. Please unblock me!

Since there were previously issues with your ability to identify compatibly-licensed material, could you link to examples of public domain or CC-compliant sources to demonstrate your understanding of licenses? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 06:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Niranjan Peethadheeshwar Shree Shree 1008 Acharya Mahamandaleshwar Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji Maharaj

Hello, Jahviraa9. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Niranjan Peethadheeshwar Shree Shree 1008 Acharya Mahamandaleshwar Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji Maharaj, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC) {{As you mentioned to demonstrate CC-compliant sources of creative commons, these are examples of CC-compliant examples-- 1-Attribution "BY"-- The Creative Commons Attribution "BY" used to denote the CC BY license is either "BY" or a graphic depiction of a human being in a circle symbol, which shows that users are permitted to reproduce, modify, publish, broadcast, transmit, publicly perform, and distribute the work, provided that proper credit is given to the author as stipulated. 2-ATTRIBUTION-NODERIVS --The Creative Commons No Derivative Works license is indicated by "ND" or a similar mark in a circle. An icon indicating that the work may be copied, distributed, displayed, or performed in its entirety without modification or adaption. 3-ATTRIBUTION-SHAREALIKE --The Creative Commons Share Alike license is represented by "SA" a circular arrow in a circle. This symbol signifies that the work may only be distributed under the license that has been selected by the original author. 4-ATTRIBUTION-NONCOMMERCIAL--The Creative Commons non-commercial license is represented by an icon featuring the letters "NC" or a dollar sign with a slash enclosed in a circle. This symbol signifies that the work may be copied, distributed, performed, or remixed by others, but solely for non-commercial purposes. 5-Public Domain Mark--The Public Domain Mark, which denotes that it is free of all known copyright restrictions 6-Public Domain Designation--The symbol of a circle containing the digit zero, is the icon employed by Creative Commons to denote its "CC0", It signifies that the originator of the work has waived their copyright to the said work and has made it available to the public domain with the stipulation of "no rights reserved." please unblock me!}}[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Niranjan Peethadheeshwar Shree Shree 1008 Acharya Mahamandaleshwar Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji Maharaj

Hello, Jahviraa9. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Niranjan Peethadheeshwar Shree Shree 1008 Acharya Mahamandaleshwar Swami Kailashanand Giri Ji Maharaj".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 20:13, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]