User talk:Joanpuig2001

Welcome!

Hello, Joanpuig2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Cillian Murphy. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ww2censor (talk) 15:58, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm BigDwiki. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Independence Day: Resurgence— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. BigDwiki (talk) 21:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to List of films considered the worst, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 23:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 16:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Murph9000 (talk) 19:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You should not be removing huge, 20k sections of articles that are clearly sourced. It looks like most of your edits have been to remove material. This can be seen as disruptive editing. If you see an article that you think need a large amount of text removed, you need to go the article talk page and just propose it. If no one has objected in several days, then do it. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 21:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny English

Don't change referenced content without substantiating your change. Additionally, changing these values by one percentage point with no substantiation makes your work appear dubious. Is there some explanation that I'm missing? Tiderolls 13:45, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that in this edit to Gulliver's Travels (2010 film), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gulliver's Travels (2010 film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Pixels (2015 film), you may be blocked from editing. Removal of reliably sourced content in this edit. Also, please stop adding your own synthesis about critical reception, such as saying a film received "positive reviews". NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:24, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at The Secret Life of Pets. Carniolus (talk) 13:11, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're still blanking large amounts of text. Also, please stop adding synthesis and violating the manual of style. Per MOS:LARGENUM, Wikipedia generally writes large numbers as "$5.6 million" instead of "$5,601,201" when more than a few significant digits are unnecessary. It's not a major issue, but it can make tables and infoboxes unwieldy. It can also overwhelm readers with too much detail in prose, especially when surrounded by many other very large numbers. I don't understand why you're blanking reception sections or changing grammatically-correct sentences to use improper grammar. It would be good if you explained yourself on a talk page somewhere. Continued disruptive behavior is likely to get you blocked. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:01, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hi Joanpuig2001. You may have noticed that people have been attempting to contact you on this talk page regarding your edits. You appear to have made no attempt to respond in any fashion. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, which means that when an editor questions your actions, you are expected to at least respond. Since you have been regularly ignoring concerns about your edits, many of which are indeed problematic, I have decided to block your account from making any further edits. It is not my goal to drive you from the project with this action, but rather to encourage you to come to this talk page and actually converse with other editors. Once you do that, we can talk about restoring your editing privileges. Appeal this block by adding the text {{Unblock|Your reason here}} to this page. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Communication is required might be worth reading. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 16:22, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]