User talk:Johnrachwan

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Widefox. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Myriam Klink because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widefox; talk 21:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to IJustine with this edit. Thank you. Martin451 (talk) 22:00, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. All (four of) your edits so far are a problem (including WP:BLP violations and self promotion) and have been reverted. It is not too late, if you don't want to be blocked. Widefox; talk 23:48, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Najwa Karam because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Tentinator 10:46, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Myriam Klink. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Tentinator 10:47, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Shailene Woodley has been reverted.
Your edit here to Shailene Woodley was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/shailenewoodley) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:55, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lisa Ann has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lisa Ann was changed by Johnrachwan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923945 on 2014-03-10T08:35:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tori Black. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tori Black was changed by Johnrachwan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959881 on 2014-03-10T08:42:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Myriam Klink because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 09:02, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Java (programming language), you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:23, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Johnrachwan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page List of manual image annotation tools, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 17:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Goodnightmush ^Talk 19:04, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]