User talk:Jtlvdhout

Welcome!

Hello, Jtlvdhout, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nanjing Sifang Art Museum, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:24, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nanjing Sifang Art Museum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nanjing Sifang Art Museum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:24, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Linked Hybrid

I have reverted your edits to Linked Hybrid as a copyright violation of [1]. Do not copy text verbatim from other websites for inclusion into Wikipedia. Doing so is a copyright violation, and repeated instances will get you blocked. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:27, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really, you shouldn't do this. Even if you do work for the architect (as you claim on Talk:Nanjing Sifang Art Museum), you have not followed the proper process for contributing this copyrighted material, and the material is not appropriate for Wikipedia any as the artist's own opinions about his work are just that: opinions, not verifiable facts. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nanjing Museum of Contemporary Art

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nanjing Museum of Contemporary Art requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:29, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright, promotion, conflict of interest

It is not enough to say that "the text was added by an administrator of the copyright holder". For one thing, copyright violation can have serious legal consequences, and we have no way to be certain that someone on the end of a wire is who he says or has the authority he claims; for another, release to Wikipedia involves more than just permission to reproduce, the terms of Wikipedia's license permit any reader to copy, modify and re-use for any purpose including commercial, and it is essential that the actual copyright owner understands and agrees to this.

The way to make a copyright release is described at WP:Donating copyrighted materials, but it is very seldom worth doing that, because material written for other purposes usually has a promotional tone unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, which requires a WP:Neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not a noticeboard for display of material written for other purposes.

The Wikipedia:Verifiability policy applies to all claims made in an article, and to establish WP:Notability it is necessary to provide references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."

There is good advice on how to write an acceptable article at WP:Your first article; if you are connected with the company whose work you are writing about, you should also read the guidelines WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest. JohnCD (talk) 16:39, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alex gil moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alex gil, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:21, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alex gil (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Josve05a were:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alex gil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alex gil, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t) Josve05a (c) 17:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jtlvdhout! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! (t) Josve05a (c) 17:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Daeyang Gallery and House for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daeyang Gallery and House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daeyang Gallery and House until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Editor General of Wiki (talk) 17:38, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]