User talk:Juhee Cha

Student Training Finished

Hello,professor. I'm Juhee Cha. I completed student training moudules. I make it! So I send you a message. Thank You. Juhee Cha (talk) 13:21, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good job! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}

re: Acticle Topic

Good choices. The topic of personal media is notable and missing. I think it is a challenging topic, so here's a bit of help from me: there are good sources out there ([1], [2] [3], , [4] but be careful and avoid unreliable websites and blogs like [5]). Part-time jobs in South Korea is also a notable topic, but likewise it may be challenging. Since you are going to be writing one article on a new topic in English already perhaps instead of the second English article you may want to consider translating two articles from English to Korean; translation is a bit easier than writing from scratch. For one class, you can write an English article, for another, translate two articles from English to Korean. This is just a suggestion, both of your topics for English are good. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:10, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can. Good luck! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Personal media moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Personal media, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheImaCow (talk) 17:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Personal media (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Personal media and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Personal media, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 13:40, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Juhee Cha! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 13:40, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Part-time jobs of South Korea

The article Part-time jobs of South Korea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not indicate the reason why part-time jobs of South Korea are notable, failing WP:N. At best, what little is in this article can be selectively merged to the Part-time job article. Furthermore, the only section of the article defines the term "part-time job" in Korean, failing WP:NOT#DICTIONARY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dps04 (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just a clarification: while part-time Jobs of South Korea could be a potentially notable topic, the article in its current form did not explain why the topic was notable and worthy of a standalone article. If you can indicate the notability of the topic, preferrably through addition of verifiable sources, I would be happy to review my proposed deletion. --Dps04 (talk) 15:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dps04: Hello. I want to note that this editor is a student working for the wiki class project and I am the instructor. I asked my students to work in the sandbox, but not everyone followed that instructions, so some early drafts are in the mainspace. First, I would suggest moving the article to the student userspace instead of the prod. Second, wouldn't you say that the notability of the subject is demonstrated by newspaper articles addressing it like [6] and [7], not to mention this book source? When notability is not clearly demonstrated (but apparent with BEFORE), I believe tagging the article with {{notability}} is sufficient, and there is no need for a PROD (I say this as someone who has done 1000s of prods and has even been criticized for being to "proddy" :>). PS. Given the existing sources, particularly the book, I think the article does not warrant a prod, nor a move to the userspace (although said move would make the article eligible for a DYK when the expansion is finished in a month or two). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: Hey Piotrus, thanks for the explanation. I have had a chance to review the newer version of the article, as well as the sources that you have cited. The first source is merely an op-ed which talks about labour reform and the South Korean government's response towards unemployment in the country, with a brief mention of part-time jobs in the country, whereas the second source is a news article which focuses on employment trends and statistics in South Korea. Part-time jobs are mentioned in the article, but there wasn't a lot mentioned specifically about the topic in those sources either. Therefore, I still think it is better if the contents in this article are selectively merged with the Part-time job article, similar to how the article currently describes part-time jobs in Australia, Canada and the United States (and those topics didnt get a standalone article either).

Having said that, I accept the argument that, just because part-time jobs in those countries haven't got standalone articles, this shall not necessarily mean the current article is mot notable, although i remain wary about whether there is a lot to expand in this article. Nevertheless, given some of my doubts as to WP:N have been addressed, and that the article has expanded beyond a mere dictionary definition as it was earlier (so it no longer fails into WP:NOT#DICTIONARY), I am gonna give the article the benefit of the doubt, and remove the prod tag. Thanks for your explanation. (And thanks for your efforts as a wiki class instructor as well :)) --Dps04 (talk) 06:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Draft:Personal media

It is a good start. The article will need more expansion, it is very short right now (check the average length of past articles submitted for this assignment to see how much longer, I'd say at least 3x-4x the current size. The structure is good. The section title 'background of apperance' is unclear, please retitle it. 3) The section 'personal media platform' needs a sentence that explaisn what is being listed. Why do you list generic concepts like blog and together with specific companies like YouTube (which is just a type of a video sharing website? 4) References need formatting. 1 and 2 don't have URLs. Please use Wikipedia:Citation templates. You can see how to do so in our videos where I show how to make edits. Overall, it is a good start and it mostly satisfies our deadline for outline, but it will need more work before the project is finished. But again, it's a pretty solid start for Week 7! Good job! PS. Since you submitted is a a draft (instead of a sandbox edit as I suggested in the video), the process will also involve a review by a random volunteer. I am unsure when the review will happen, but the comments it provide will be interesting. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Part-time jobs of South Korea

Like above, it is a good start that will need significant expansion over the next two months. Please make sure the article uses citation templates. Please try to find higher quality sources like academic journals and books; this is a very good source and should be used more in the development of the article. Anyway, good job starting your projects! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:19, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good job

Making your weekly 10 edits. Keep it up! If you make more than 10 edits, each extra 10 edits (on average) will count for an extra credit point. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

re: Wiki Assignment Deadline 4, Juhee Cha

Very nice progress, your outlines look pretty solid! Keep up the good job! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Food swap, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Homegrown and Homemade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Juhee.

My name is Gyongmin, and I'm taking the lecture 'Collective Intelligence' like you. For our Deadline 5, all of us need to review another colleague's article, which I'm sure you'd also know about. So, I chose to review your article that you are expanding in your sandbox(User:Juhee_Cha/Part-time_jobs_of_South_Korea). I could read it very easily, since you formatted the article so well, and most of the references seemed reliable even at first sight. I just have a couple of things to tell you and hope that my feedback could be at least a little bit of assistance when completing your final assignment.

1. I couldn't quite get what the phrase "distinguishing part-time jobs from actors' characteristics (students, teenagers, housewives, etc.) or purposes (part-time jobs or incidental activities) does not reflect reality properly." is trying to express. Maybe a little more explanation about this phrase might be needed for easier understanding.

2. The pronunciation that you wrote al-ba and A-r-byte would look prettier if it would be written like this: al-ba (Korean: 알바), A-r-byte (Korean: 아르바이트). Like other articles containing Korean word pronunciation.

3. Lastly, about the word freeters you used, this is the first time I saw this so I'm not 100% sure about this, but is freeter and Fritters the same thing? The contextual meaning seems the same to me when I read the article, but those two different words are suggested all of a sudden and it seems a little bit confusing. If you are ok with it I think using only one word might be better. But if it's just my misunderstanding and if those two have different meanings, I owe you an apology.

I had a great time reading your article. Even though there are some contents not yet written, there was still some information to learn about even for a guy like me, who has lived most of his life in Korea. I think your article will be a great help to people from other countries who are looking for information about part-time jobs in South Korea. I'll be pulling for your best of luck, and hope to see your article as an updated version again. Thank you for your time reading this. -- Gyongmin M 10:19, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! Juhee Cha (talk) 08:25, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Business model, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I read the article well!

Hello! I read the article well. It was a very empathetic article because I also had experience working part-time. Especially, the table was easy to understand. If you develop this article further, I think you can deliver good information about Korean part-time jobs to many people. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chunyoungryun(2016014102) (talk • contribs) 06:21, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deadline #6

Review of User:Juhee Cha/Personal media

Good job overall! Here are things we should fix:

the article needs a lead/summary/abstract. See WP:LEAD. If you intend for the current first two paragraphs to be the lead, please note that the lead should not contain any new content, so you'll need to copy that content and merge it with the rest of the article.
what is the source of the images?
images need a better description, at least a full sentence. Why do the objects/symbols shown represent 'personal media' or 'process of change'?
for references, please expand them by adding 1) English translated title for Korean sources (do not replace the Korean title, but add translation using the |trans-title code, see my video on referencing articles on how to do it in visual editor 2) name of the publisher instead of the website name, ex. for www.cogito.or.kr it should be Cogito
The sentence about Spoon Radio is out of place, why discuss this particular app and not another one? We also need a better reference than to the Apple Store (see WP:SPS and WP:PRIMARY)
the section 'Background' should probably be the first, before 'Features'.
the section 'process of change' has a confusing name as it does not explain what is being changed; the world change is not used in the section at all outside the heading
if you cannot think of what to add to the 'See Also' section please remove it
don't forget to capitalize the first letter of a section title
you should try to add some more hyperlinks (blue links; see WP:BTW)

Very good job overall, I think you are 90% done! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review of User:Juhee Cha/Part-time jobs of South Korea

in addition to some similar issues as in the other article (expand / translate references, capitalization, more hyperlinks) I also noticed this:
there are some unreferenced paragraphs, please reference them. Related issue is that
some paragraphs are very short, please merge them so that the blocks of text are bigger. Please see Wikipedia:Writing_better_articles#Paragraphs.

Please let me know when you address those issues and I can give you further feedback. Good job! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Second review round for your articles

User:Juhee Cha/Part-time jobs of South Korea is almost ready, all that is needed is to 1) add English title translation to the references 2) remove bold formatting from the subheadings 3) for the book 아르바이트 노동의 개념과 특성 you should add page ranges you read and cited, so that the reader who wants to double-check things in the book can only read small number of pages, and does not have to search for info in the entire book and 4) see if you can some photos to the article, either from Wikimedia Commons or (for extra credit) your own photos you have taken yourself and you can upload.

User:Juhee Cha/Personal media seems all good! Very nice job!

Both your articles are ready to be moved to the mainspace (click the 'More' pull-down menu in the top right, and move them to the article mainspace). After that, I encourage you go nominate them for the main page at T:TDYK for extra credit, see our video on how you'd an do this. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:07, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. The last item to do is to add [[WP:CAT|categories[[, You may also consider submitting your work to WP:DYK for the front page exposure, see our video on how to do it. Very nicely done! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:29, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Personal media

Hello, Juhee Cha, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username North8000, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Personal media, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personal media.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Juhee Cha

Thank you for creating Part-time jobs in South Korea.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Personal media

Hello, Juhee Cha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Personal media".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:11, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Part-time jobs of South Korea

Hello, Juhee Cha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Part-time jobs of South Korea".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:05, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]