User talk:Khufd

October 2017

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Terminator (franchise) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 00:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 16:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, you may be blocked from editing. --Yamla (talk) 16:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. GnomeSweetGnome (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Which article?

Mr, GnomeSweetGnome, which article do you exactly thought when you sent a message about disruptive editing because I made correct edits without vandalism. Khufd (talk) 17:55, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is untrue because the film never gave an opening date. This edit is also original research. You need to stop adding your own opinions to articles. GnomeSweetGnome (talk) 16:27, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Data on Halloween series

For the first one, I will delete it. But for second one, however, is not original research. It is actually from Halloween wiki from Fandom website and there is a small article about it. You can check it freelly on web, just go on Google, type halloween wiki and you will see the word Fandom along with those two words above. It's not a joke. Khufd (talk) 14:17, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikis are not reliable sources and use of User generated content is unacceptable. Wikipedia needs to be verifiable and opinions put forth on other wikis aren't. GnomeSweetGnome (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About the wikipedia rule

So you think that is all lie seen in fandom wikis? That rule in wikipedia is a bit questionable (it depends on some things) and you should think about it again what I said before. I am far more serious, constructive and I research more than you think. Look again into those other wikis related to other franchises (movies, TV shows and games) and realise about it. If you don't like it, fine, but at least think what I said. I don't want vandalize or even pollute some content, only what I think is objective, right and correct. Original research or not, what is correct, it is correct; what is wrong, is wrong. I will not do original research on wiki pages, of course, but if it is something that is not always original research, than it should be put on page. Or not, if it's something wrong. But sometimes, there is big line between verifiable sources and original research and vice-versa and should be taken seriously, sometimes even thinking and questioning of those two things. I think the other users should learn from my experience and talk between me and you and, if they want, take this wise cue from this debate. Or not. I was active on wiki long before logging in, about 2-3 years, mostly fixing grammatical mistakes, but sometimes adding new things. For second article, then let it be what you made...but also think about what I wrote. Khufd (talk) 23:32, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say all fandom wikis are lies I said they aren't verifiable. What you added wasn't even stated in the wiki so it doesn't matter anyway. Wikipedia isn't simply about what is correct which is why original research isn't allowed. The ability to verify facts is what matters. This isn't an issue just between you and I. You have multiple warnings for the same actions in other articles. Please stop adding personal views to articles no matter how true you believe them to be. If you don't have a reliable source then don't add it. GnomeSweetGnome (talk) 23:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Fine...but there is some truth what I said. Khufd (talk) 23:41, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (film). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm Ferret. I noticed that you recently removed content from Battlefield 1942 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- ferret (talk) 22:12, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited General (DC Comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flashpoint (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm Darkknight2149. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Batman: The Killing Joke. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Swear words such as "b**ch" should only be censored in quotes if the original quote was censored to begin with. Thank you. Dark Knight 2149 16:42, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Please see this edit where I reverted back to your edit stating "Self rv misclicked". –Davey2010^Talk 20:22, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kyle Rayner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Convergence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Teen Titans Go! (TV series), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:57, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Arrow characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hub City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of minor DC Comics characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huntress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ted Kord, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 18:22, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Dan Garret. General Ization ^Talk 18:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 14:56, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Khufd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I deleted this from article COD:WWII because I thought being as inappropriate and irrelevant to this article as a whole, probably also as being bit sensitive as well. Maybe for other users and Ferret deleting is not constructive unlike me, but either case, then I will not touch this in exchange for returning unblock rights.

Decline reason:

This is not about a single edit. It's about a pattern of disruptive edits. Yamla (talk) 00:08, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cupid (comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barry Allen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Khufd. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Man of Steel (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 22:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ghostbusters: The Video Game, you may be blocked from editing. Do not remove maintenance templates without either addressing the issue or explaining why the issue is not relevant. I see you have had trouble with this in the past. When a fact is tagged as needing a citation, an editor is challenging the statement and requesting as citation, as explained at WP:V. Your options at that point are to remove the statement as unsourced, add a citation to a reliable source or leave it as it is. SummerPhD^v2.0 22:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

The Good Fight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Croatian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to. Dark Knight 2149 19:46, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, I'm Incnis Mrsi. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of totalitarian regimes‎ without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thanks. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:18, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of totalitarian regimes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Merlin04 (talk) 21:42, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you persist with edits only intended to make Wikipedia to agree with your personal taste, then you will not be tolerated here longer than for few days. You either make constructive edits here or go to other sites with all your stylistic preferences and attempts to censor content. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 06:56, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Feud (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Niki Caro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"NC-17 elements"

Wikipedia is not censored.★Trekker (talk) 08:59, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you rever me under an IP without motivation?★Trekker (talk) 10:29, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arrowverse task force‎

As someone who has frequently edited the Arrowverse article in the past, you may be interested in participating in the newly created Arrowverse task force‎. -- /Alex/₂₁ 03:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

Hi Khufd! Thank you for your edits to List of minor DC Comics characters. It looks like you've copied or moved text from one or more pages into that page, and while you are welcome to do so, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 17:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding on to the above, there's no need to create "backup"s of Wikipedia articles, since Wikipedia admins can restore any deleted content (see WP:REFUND for instance). If there is a consensus to delete the content, then creating "backup"s on Wikipedia won't help you anyway, much like "backing up" a file on your PC by creating a copy on the same PC is of no use. Better to "backup" to a wikia, such as DC Database.--Martin IIIa (talk) 01:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jungle Book

Hi, that is very close to outright edit warring. If you had been a new user I'd issue a level 3 warning for it. The punctuation of the captions is simply contrary to policy: we only add full stops to complete sentences, as you can readily verify from the MOS. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:00, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]