User talk:Koopastar/Archive 2023

Welcome!

Hi Koopastar! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --🐦DrWho42👻 07:51, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate it. Koopastar (talk) 07:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Cabinet Man for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cabinet Man is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cabinet Man until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

wizzito | say hello! 00:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dinosaurchestra.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dinosaurchestra.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Zubin Sedghi 2012.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Zubin Sedghi 2012.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 20:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Zubin Sedghi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Zubin Sedghi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. casualdejekyll 22:42, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

@Koopastar - I like a lot of the same music and musicians that you do. I understand you want to contribute information about them to Wikipedia, but you really should read pages like WP:Your first article and Wikipedia:General notability guideline - In particular, Wikipedia only includes articles about subjects that have been given significant coverage multiple reliable sources which are independent of the subject casualdejekyll 22:58, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Zubin Sedghi 2012.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Zubin Sedghi 2012.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. casualdejekyll 23:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Koopa, I really don't want to discourage you from editing Wikipedia, but your Zubin Sedghi article had a LOT of issues - one of which is that this image does not appear to be licensed under a CC license, like you claim it is. casualdejekyll 23:07, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Please, feel free to reach out to me with questions about various Wikipedia processes. casualdejekyll 23:07, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Re; Hidden in the Sand

@Koopastar - I've restored the redirect back to Marvin's Marvelous Mechanical Museum (album), since the sources used in the article you wrote for the song aren't sufficient to support a stand alone Wikipedia article. I suggest that you refrain from creating new articles directly and instead use the Articles for creation process until you gain more familiarity with Wikipedia - this will require another editor to review your work as a draft before moving it to the main encyclopedia.

I am not saying this to try to discourage you from creating articles - I think it's great that you're interested in writing articles! It's just that the articles you've written have been either deleted or redirected multiple times, and I think it would save the work for all of us if you used the Draft: space first, since there would be no need to start deletion discussions.

Relevant reading: Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything, Wikipedia:Notability (music) casualdejekyll 00:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

The Hidden in the Sand article followed several of the criteria mentioned in music notability with verifiable sources such as the RIAA though. The Bidding was written the same way and didn't receive any deletion notices. Koopastar (talk) 00:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

That's WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Per the same criteria you cite, "All articles on albums or other recordings should meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." I know it's confusing. casualdejekyll 00:53, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

I doubt that article is notable either. Note that iTunes charts are not considered reliable. wizzito | say hello! 00:43, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

WP:NALBUM criteria 3 uses "The recording has been certified gold or higher in at least one country" as notability. Koopastar (talk) 00:59, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Also note "Specific to recordings, a recording may be notable if it meets at least one of these criteria" and "Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography." wizzito | say hello! 01:03, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zubin Sedghi (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zubin Sedghi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 05:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Koopastar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca talk to me! 05:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cheers JtG.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cheers JtG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bummerland has been accepted

Bummerland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:39, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I Won't (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuck You. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: My Play has been accepted

My Play, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

voorts (talk/contributions) 22:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of OK Overture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OK Overture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OK Overture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

voorts (talk/contributions) 15:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Yes I'm a Mess

Hello. Regarding the article Yes I'm a Mess, you created the article with unsourced genres, so they've been removed per WP:V. Also, we should avoid citing e-commerce sources like Tidal and Spotify per WP:AFFILIATE, so I've removed the Tidal citation in the personnel section. Personnel sections don't need to be sourced on album articles so there's no real reason (in the absence of contentious information) that they need to be on song articles either. It's expected they come from the album or single liner notes. Thanks. Ss112 11:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AJR The Maybe Man.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AJR The Maybe Man.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Cheers (Jukebox the Ghost album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheers (Jukebox the Ghost album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheers (Jukebox the Ghost album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk | contributions) 23:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited All My Favorite Songs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AJR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Metzger (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Metzger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: What Everyone's Thinking has been accepted

What Everyone's Thinking, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:06, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hidden in the Sand (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by PerfectSoundWhatever were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hidden in the Sand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 03:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Koopastar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 03:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Horowitz (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Horowitz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 14:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Metzger (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Metzger and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 01:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Weak (AJR song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Weak (AJR song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grk1011 -- Grk1011 (talk) 14:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC)