User talk:Krrush

Welcome

Hello Krrush and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Getting Started First steps • FAQ Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Place {{helpme}} on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists		Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 17:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

ukexpat (talk) 17:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ayodele Awojobi

The number of subheadings is really just a matter of preference. I think it should be similar to what you would find in a magazine or newspaper article. Not too many, not too few. Go ahead and do what you feel best. I agreed that the meaning of Doctor of Science should be spelled out, and the fact that it is beyond PhD. But a heading is not a means of emphasis. It identifies a new topic. Now if you were really ambitious, you could try to explain in layman's terms what original work lead to the D Sc. A heading for that explanation would clearly make sense.

Learning all the technicalities takes a long time. I know that I often break the rules, and keep finding new ones. I am lazy too. I find a source like this one, and just put "publisher=Daily Trust", but really it is from Media Trust's paper Daily Trust reproduced by AllAfrica Global Media on their site AllAfrica.com. Technically, the reference should spell all that out - and there are parameters for each bit of information. To me the really important information is the title, date, publication/publisher and date it was found on the internet, so I don't bother with the rest - but I should.

To get beyond a C grade, the article has to give comprehensive coverage and follow all the style rules. I am not sure it is worthwhile. Most readers probably just want a thumbnail sketch of the person: their main life events and achievements, a sense of the type of person they were. Too much detail might overwhelm the reader. That is just a personal opinion. Anyway, good work and keep it up! Aymatth2 (talk) 13:24, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:45, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ayodele Awojobi

The article Ayodele Awojobi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Ayodele Awojobi for things which need to be addressed. Ankit Maity ^Talk _Contribs 16:18, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Ayodele Awojobi. JPEG.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ayodele Awojobi. JPEG.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ayodele Awojobi. JPEG.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Women- Monthly Contest

	Wiki Loves Women- Monthly Contest!
	Hello, this is to notify you about a monthly article writing contest organized by Wikimedia User Group Nigeria in collaboration with Wiki Loves Women to increase the coverage of Nigerian women on Wikipedia! This contest starts on September 20, 2016. Thank you.

Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 17:09, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Wiki Loves Women Nigeria writing contest intivation

	Wiki Loves Women- Monthly Contest (September)!
	Hello, this is to notify you about a monthly article writing contest organized by Wikimedia User Group Nigeria in collaboration with Wiki Loves Women to increase the coverage of Nigerian women on Wikipedia! The theme for the month of September is Women in Entertainment. See the contest page here. Thank you. Delivered: 13:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)