User talk:Lawyer.F

March 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account from editing. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

• To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
• If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken or in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 

Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:04, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Aera Legal/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Aera Legal/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:26, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azerbaijan Energy Regulatory Agency (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nocturnal781 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Azerbaijan Energy Regulatory Agency and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nocturnal781 (talk) 03:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Aera Legal! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nocturnal781 (talk) 03:40, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

I'm not interested in that article anymore. it might be deteled Lawyer.F (talk) 15:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Azerbaijan Energy Regulatory Agency

Hello, Aera Legal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Azerbaijan Energy Regulatory Agency, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Azerbaijan Energy Regulatory Agency

Hello, Lawyer.F. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Azerbaijan Energy Regulatory Agency".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 10:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Renamed

Unblocked. Welcome back. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Hello, Lawyer.F. I noticed that your recent edit to Jafar Kavian added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 10:01, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Thats a lot for information. Actually I endeavour to add a link to an image that you can see in russian and azerbaijani versions. is it nesessary to add the same into english version database or it is still possible to use the image from other language versions? Lawyer.F (talk) 06:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mohammad Khan Qajar of Erivan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

See also [1] [2] [3]. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

please make it clear what you mean under my own point? Accorcing to all official documents the head of khates (Khan) were having the titul of sardar, that means the general in army. Even the palace of erivan khans was called "Sardar palace", that means the 'palace of general'. you can check it thoughout of the internet. It is an axiom, not theory. Lawyer.F (talk) 16:27, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia is based on WP:RS citations, not our own personal deductions/conclusions (see WP:SYNTH and WP:OR). Also, please click and read the three links I posted. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Mohammad-Ali Mirza Dowlatshah, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

from the article about Mohammed Khan Qajar you can see that the name of the city in the Qajar's period was Erivan. When you canged that for Dowlatshah, it is confused. Please amend that mistake Lawyer.F (talk) 16:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Moreover, in the article "Qajar iran" you can see that the court language and mother tongue of royal family of Qajar was Azerbaijani. So, it is not justice to depict the name of Dowlatshah just in persian, ignoring azerbaijani. Please amend that Lawyer.F (talk) 16:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Except you changed the name to "İrevan", not "Erivan" - please remember this is the English Wiki, we use English spellings. You also added the irredentist "South Azerbaijan" and attempted to hide the word "Iran/Persia" by replacing it with "Qajar state". The official language was Persian, not Azeri, and especially not the Latin Azeri alphabet that was created much later. HistoryofIran (talk) 16:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

You clearly haven't read the links and rules I posted since you're still at it [4]. First off, the "general" bit is unsourced, and Azeris were not an ethnonym yet, just to name a few sources;

• "The third major nation in South Caucasia,19 the Azerbaijanis, hardly existed as an ethnic group, let alone a nation, before the twentieth century. The inhabitants of the territory now occupied by Azerbaijan defined themselves as Muslims, members of the Muslim umma; or as Turks, members of a language group spread over a vast area of Central Asia; or as Persians (the founder of Azerbaijani literature, Mirza Fath’ Ali Akhundzadä, described himself as ‘almost Persian’). ‘Azerbaijani identity remained fluid and hybrid’ comments R. G. Suny (1999–2000: 160). As late as 1900, the Azerbaijanis remained divided into six tribal groups – the Airumy, Karapapakh, Pavlari, Shakhsereny, Karadagtsy and Afshavy. The key period of the formation of the Azerbaijani nation lies between the 1905 revolution and the establishment of the independent People’s Republic of Azerbaijan in 1918 (Altstadt, 1992: 95)." -- Ben Fowkes (2002). Ethnicity and Conflict in the Post-Communist World. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 14
• "Azerbaijani national identity emerged in post-Persian Russian-ruled East Caucasia at the end of the nineteenth century, and was finally forged during the early Soviet period." -- Gasimov, Zaur (2022). "Observing Iran from Baku: Iranian Studies in Soviet and Post-Soviet Azerbaijan". Iranian Studies. 55 (1): page 37
• "In fact, the change in defining national identity in Azerbaijan was a result of a combination of developments in the 1930s in Turkey, Iran, Germany, and the Soviet Union. The article concludes that these developments left Soviet rulers no choice but to construct an independent Azerbaijani identity." -- Harun Yilmaz (2013). "The Soviet Union and the Construction of Azerbaijani National Identity in the 1930s". Iranian Studies. 46 (4). p. 511
• "The ethno-genesis of the Azerbaijani nation can thus be traced, in a formal, bureaucratic manner at least, to the late 1930s. Hardly unique in the history of the Soviet or other states, the Azerbaijani case demonstrates the logic of Stalinist national-state construction, whereby the formation of a Soviet republic named Azerbaijan required the existence of an Azerbaijani nation to inhabit it." p. 229, Monuments and Identities in the Caucasus Karabagh, Nakhichevan and Azerbaijan in Contemporary Geopolitical Conflict, Brill

HistoryofIran (talk) 16:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

there are were official languages of Qajar state or Qajar iran (after Mozaffaraddin that name of the state in some official documents was changed from Memleketi mekhsusi Qajar to Memeleketi Mekhsusi Iran), not one. So, we have to consider both languages. Are not we? Lawyer.F (talk) 16:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Does that mean that you are agree to change yerevan into Erivan, as it was during the Qajars? Lawyer.F (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Please read [5] - and the official name was Guarded Domains of Iran (fully sourced article) and similar variants. I don't mind Erivan, and can you please address/reply to my other comments too? HistoryofIran (talk) 16:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Concerning the ethnic group, the name of ethnic group up today is turkish)) "Azerbaijanis" mostly the name of nation and name of the people who live in the toponym (territory) of Azerbaijan rather than the name of ethnic group. Nationality is about citizenthip, not ethnic belonging. And I don't mentioned ehtnic group when added the category. Lawyer.F (talk) 17:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

That makes no sense, because Azerbaijan first emerged in 1918, and you're adding it to pre-1918 figures. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

You mean emerged like politonym, but not the name of the people. Because, even within Russian Empire the name of some political parties had the word 'Azerbaijani', established in early 1900s. You can check it. If you mean the peoples who called themthelf Azerbaijanians, we can also find the documents from 1813, the period of Abbas mirza ruling. However, in 1813 that encompass all ethic groups, like in 1911. therefore, it is clear when we can consider the word 'Azerbaijanis' like the name of nation, not ethnic group Lawyer.F (talk) 17:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

More unsourced claims, I've already posted sources about this, here are some more;

• "Until the late 19th and early 20th century it would be unthinkable to refer to the Muslim inhabitants of the Caucasus as Azaris (Azeris) or Azerbaijanis, since the people and the geographical region that bore these names were located to the south of the Araxes River. Therefore, the Iranian intelligentsia raised eyebrows once the independent Republic of Azerbaijan was declared in 1918 just across the Iranian border. - pp. 176-177, Avetikian, Gevorg. "Pān-torkism va Irān [Pan-Turkism and Iran]", Iran and the Caucasus 14, 1 (2010), Brill
• "In the case of the third major ethnic group of South Caucasus, the Azerbaijanis, the path towards nationhood was strewn with obstacles. First, there was uncertainty about Azerbaijani ethnic identity, which was a result of the influence of Azerbaijan’s many and varied pre-Russian conquerors, starting with the Arabs in the mid-seventh century and continuing with the Saljuq Turks, the Mongols, the Ottoman Turks and the Iranians. Hence the relatively small local intelligentsia wavered between Iranian, Ottoman, Islamic, and pan-Turkic orientations. Only a minority supported a specifically Azerbaijani identity, as advocated most prominently by Färidun bäy Köchärli." -- idem, p. 68
• "Azerbaijan first tried to create a national identity in 1918 at the time of the formation of the first Azerbaijan republic. Because of linguistic factors and despite its deep and long connection with Iran, Azerbaijan constructed its identity on the basis of Turkism and even pan-Turkism." Eldar Mamedov (2017). The New Geopolitics of the South Caucasus: Prospects for Regional Cooperation and Conflict Resolution: Azerbaijan Twenty-Five Years after Independence: Accomplishments and Shortcomings. Edited by Shireen Hunter. Lexington Books. p. 29

HistoryofIran (talk) 17:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

all your likes about the concious of the people like ethnic group. Politonym, tolonym and the name of the ethics are totally different. take a look: 'Muslim inhabitants of the Caucasus'. it is aboput the people and how they indentify themselfs. "In the case of the third major ethnic group of South Caucasus" actually uptoday. It is the first nation of caucasus, not the third one. that proves the author's biasness. Moreover, it is still about the ethnic group. the last one: "Azerbaijan first tried to create a national identity in 1918" you see - 'the national indentity' it is not about ethnical group, but nationality and it is true. I have not stated that the national councious (that came from citizenship) emerged earlier. If you put the category of generals just the people with nationality of Azerbaijan, that wou;d fit to the first methodology I had described Lawyer.F (talk) 17:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

You're still repeating unsourced claims (this is the fourth or fifth time in this talk page alone) despite the overwhelming consensus by WP:RS. And your comment also demonstrates that you did properly read the citations, if at all. I'm not interested in taking further part in this conversation, as it's clearly not going anywhere when you are disregarding WP:RS and our rules. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

But than you write ' Azerbaijan first emerged in 1918' it is TOTALLY wrong perception. the toponym of Azerbaijan was know much more earlier and even like the official name of the region. Take a look at the articles of Turkmenchay treaty. or hit the documents of Abbas mirza who was the governor of Azerbaijan, or you can look at Seljuc documents where they appointed the governors of Azerbaijan. Like the name of the state we can see "Azerbaijan" in the name of the Atabegs of Azerbaijan. that üas the official legal name of the state Lawyer.F (talk) 17:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

You're still making unsourced claims that contradict what WP:RS says.

• "Let us conclude with an important point. The pre-1918 maps indicate various names of regions or states north of the river Araxes, such as “Albania” or “Arran”. No map knows of “Azerbaijan” north of the Araxes. This name was applied for centuries to the northern province of Iran, originally called Atropatene, around Tabriz, i.e. south of the Araxes. The Encyclopaedia of Islam published in 1913 leaves no room for doubt: “Nowadays, under ‘Adharbaydjan’ is understood the north-western province of Persia”. The name “Azerbaijan”, which the present-day republic adopted in 1918, is, therefore, a result of later socio-political developments.In the 1930s, this name was adopted by the Soviet authorities: it suited Stalin who considered expansion to Iran" - p. 42, Monuments and Identities in the Caucasus Karabagh, Nakhichevan and Azerbaijan in Contemporary Geopolitical Conflict, Brill
• "The name Azarbaijan is a pre-Islamic Persian name for a pre-Islamic province south of the River Aras. “Azarbaijan” was not used in any definite or clear manner for the area north of the River Aras in the pre- modern period. In some instances, the name Azarbaijan was used in a manner that included the Aran region immediately to the north of the River Aras, but this was rather an exception. The adoption of this name for the area north of the River Aras was by the nationalist, Baku-based Mosavat government (1918–20) and was later retained by the Soviet Union." p. 16 - Behrooz, Maziar (2023). Iran at War: Interactions with the Modern World and the Struggle with Imperial Russia. I.B. Tauris
• "In fact, in medieval times the name ‘Azerbaijan’ was applied not to the area of present independent Azerbaijan but to the lands to the south of the Araxes river, now part of Iran. The lands to the north west of the Araxes were known as Albania; the lands to the north east, the heart of present-day post-Soviet Azerbaijan, were known as Sharvan (or Shirwan) and Derbend." p. 30, Fowkes, B. (2002). Ethnicity and Ethnic Conflict in the Post-Communist World. Springer.
• "The adoption of the name “Azerbaijan” in 1918 by the Mussavatist government for classical Caucasian Albania (Arrān and Sharvān) was due to political reasons28. For example, the giant orientalist of the early 20th century, Vasily Barthold has stated: “… whenever it is necessary to choose a name that will encompass all regions of the republic of Azerbaijan, the name Arrān can be chosen. But the term Azerbaijan was chosen because when the Azerbaijan republic was created, it was assumed that this and the Persian Azerbaijan will be one entity, because the population of both has a big similarity. On this basis, the word Azerbaijan was chosen. Of course right now when the word Azerbaijan is used, it has two meanings as Persian Azerbaijan and as a republic, it’s confusing and a question rises as to which Azerbaijan is being talked about”. In the post-Islamic sense, Arrān and Sharvān are often distinguished while in the pre-Islamic era, Arrān or the Western Caucasian Albania roughly corresponds to the modern territory of republic of Azerbaijan. In the Soviet era, in a breathtaking manipulation, historical Azerbaijan (NW Iran) was reinterpreted as “South Azerbaijan” in order for the Soviets to lay territorial claim on historical Azerbaijan proper which is located in modern Northwestern Iran". p. 10, Lornejad, Siavash; Doostzadeh, Ali (2012). Arakelova, Victoria; Asatrian, Garnik (eds.). On the modern politicization of the Persian poet Nezami Ganjavi (PDF). Caucasian Centre for Iranian Studies.
• "The case of Azerbaijan is interesting in several aspects. The geographical name “Azerbaijan” for the territory where the Republic of Azerbaijan is now situated, as well as the ethnic name for the Caucasian Turks, “Azerbaijani,” were coined in the beginning of the 10th century. The name Azerbaijan, which implies the lands located north of the Aras River, is a duplicate of the historical region of Azerbaijan (it is the arabized version of the name of a historical region of Atropatena) which is the north-western region of Iran. After the proclamation of the first Republic of Azerbaijan in 1918, the Turkish army invaded the Caucasus, and the name “Azerbaijan” was offered by a young Turkish regime to the Turkish-speaking territory" p. 253, After the Soviet Empire. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 05 Oct. 2015.
• "The Ottoman Turks coveted Iran’s province of Azerbaijan. Therefore following the Bolshevik revolution, in 1918 installed a pro-Turkish government in Baku and named it after the Iranian province of Azerbaijan" - p. xvii, The New Geopolitics of the South Caucasus: Prospects for Regional Cooperation and Conflict Resolution (Contemporary Central Asia: Societies, Politics, and Cultures), Lexington Books, Shireen Hunter
• "Until 1918, when the Musavat regime decided to name the newly independent state Azerbaijan, this designation had been used exclusively to identify the Iranian province of Azerbaijan." - p. 60, Dekmejian, R. Hrair; Simonian, Hovann H. (2003). Troubled Waters: The Geopolitics of the Caspian Region. I.B. Tauris.
• "The region to the north of the river Araxes was not called Azerbaijan prior to 1918, unlike the region in northwestern Iran that has been called since so long ago." p. 356, Rezvani, Babak (2014). Ethno-territorial conflict and coexistence in the caucasus, Central Asia and Fereydan: academisch proefschrift. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press
• "The name Azerbaijan was also adopted for Arrān, historically an Iranian region, by anti-Russian separatist forces of the area when, on 26 May 1918, they declared its independence and called it the Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan. To allay Iranian concerns, the Azerbaijan government used the term “Caucasian Azerbaijan” in the documents for circulation abroad." - Multiple Authors, Encyclopaedia Iranica
• "Originally the term Azerbaijan was the name of the Iranian historical province Adarbaigan, or Azarbaijan (from older Aturpatakan) in the north-west of the country. This term, as well as its respective derivative, Azari (or, in Turkish manner, Azeri), as “ethnonym”, was not applied to the territory north of Arax (i.e. the area of the present-day Azerbaijan Republic, former Arran and Shirvan) and its inhabitants up until the establishment of the Musavat regime in that territory (1918-1920)." - p. 85, note 1, Morozova, I. (2005). Contemporary Azerbaijani Historiography on the Problem of "Southern Azerbaijan" after World War II, Iran and the Caucasus, 9(1)
• "Until the late 19th and early 20th century it would be unthinkable to refer to the Muslim inhabitants of the Caucasus as Azaris (Azeris) or Azerbaijanis, since the people and the geographical region that bore these names were located to the south of the Araxes River. Therefore, the Iranian intelligentsia raised eyebrows once the independent Republic of Azerbaijan was declared in 1918 just across the Iranian border. - pp. 176-177, Avetikian, Gevorg. "Pān-torkism va Irān [Pan-Turkism and Iran]", Iran and the Caucasus 14, 1 (2010), Brill

HistoryofIran (talk) 17:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

"The name Azarbaijan is a pre-Islamic Persian name for a pre-Islamic province south of the River Aras" ))) why you nemtioned that? we don't discuss pre-islamic period Lawyer.F (talk) 17:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

• mentioned

Lawyer.F (talk) 17:30, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

That means the name dates from the pre-Islamic period... and out of every single citation that was your conclusion??? Did you read the rest of it? HistoryofIran (talk) 17:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

"The adoption of this name for the area north of the River Aras was by the nationalist, Baku-based Mosavat government" it is illegal)) contradict with international treatments. Just lets skip such anti-scientific statement Lawyer.F (talk) 17:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

No, we're not skipping something because you don't agree with it. See WP:JDLI and WP:RS. I'm outta here. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

We can skip it because of turkmenchay agreement and plethora treatments. you just discuss some people's conclusion. please, go through the official documents Lawyer.F (talk) 17:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

'the lands to the north east, the heart of present-day post-Soviet Azerbaijan, were known as Sharvan' Shirvan is the name of the state, declared by arabic people. it was not toponym first. Secoundly, where the area of the Seljuc governor of Azerbaijan? do you mean that seljucts mentioned just south azerbaijan? have you ever seen such document? Lawyer.F (talk) 17:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

"ethnic name for the Caucasian Turks" there is no single official document where the ethnic belonging mentioned like "Azerbaijani". Uptoday Lawyer.F (talk) 17:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

"name “Azerbaijan” was offered by a young Turkish regime to the Turkish-speaking territory" tis statement contradicts with the facts that Azerbaijan Democratic Republic is declared in 28/05/1918 and turlish army was invited by the official governemt later. So, the turkish regime has not any chance to dictate something Lawyer.F (talk) 17:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

"government in Baku and named it after the Iranian province of Azerbaijan", what was the official name of the toponym during the russian empire officially? Область Азербайджан. That was stipulated in official documents Lawyer.F (talk) 17:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

""The region to the north of the river Araxes was not called Azerbaijan prior to 1918," all such statements are contradics with the official international treatments. If you like, i'll pick them up for you tomorrow. but you can find them by yourself also. if try Lawyer.F (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

https://mfa.gov.az/files/shares/Treaty%20of%20Turkmenchay.pdf Article XV. that is the answer to all your likns and meaningless souces about the Musavatis or Biolshevic invention the name of the country. perhaps these books are written by the people who had never seen any official documents Lawyer.F (talk) 17:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Finally a source, except that not WP:RS as it's a file uploaded by the government of Azerbaijan (we follow info by scholars when it comes to history, not governments...you didn't read WP:RS), and even that says "Azerbaijan province"...which is.. you know, the province/region that has been mentioned in multiple sources here? And rest of your comments are just WP:JDLI/WP:OR rejections of sources by scholars who are much more reliable than you. You've been told countless times that Wikipedia is based on WP:RS, not your personal opinion/deductions/conclusions. Despite this, you have written WP:OR/WP:SYNTH comments probably 10 times by now. Please read WP:CIR. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:57, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Yu didn't read the official document. All books that you mentioned are wrong and they contradicts even to materials in wikipedia. Of you can find any other source of the treaty, you can read that. Lawyer.F (talk) 18:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

All such "scholars" how ignored the official documents are not considerable as reliable. They stated that the toponym of Azerbaijan implemented into north from Araxes rover just in 1918)) are they reliable ? Had they ever seen the territory of atabeks of Azerbaijan ? That covers both part of the river. Is it less reliable than the schoolers who stated they own perception ? Lawyer.F (talk) 18:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

or Shah Ismail first declared themself as the khagan (Shah) of Azerbaijan l, then, after he conquered Iran - also king of iran. In that time Iran was just part of modern Iran. If the person who call themself 'schoolar' ingots the facts is he or she still reliable ? Lawyer.F (talk) 18:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

I can give you the links of tons of books where declared that the word of Iran as polytonym invented just by pahlavi in 1925. They are reliable that you, would your convenience you? I'm sure that would not. Legally speaking it is challengeable Lawyer.F (talk) 18:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

anf you have been You've been told countless times that don't mention the sources that contradicts with the legal facts. But you keep referring to 10s of meaningless statements. I'll give you a lots of sources , if you like. Just take a look at other articles about the name of Azerbaijan in wikipedia. Do you think that they are less reliable than these ,which you mentioned ? Lawyer.F (talk) 18:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Even if you consider that the name of Azerbaijan was implied just for the south Azerbaijan , you have to amend your article. Because the article in question is about the south. Lawyer.F (talk) 18:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Sigh, this is hopeless... just don't disrupt any more articles. HistoryofIran (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

not just for you, I'll put here all reliable sources to show you all distracting act of these 'scholars' that you mentioned Lawyer.F (talk) 19:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

https://www.hist.msu.ru/ER/Etext/FOREIGN/turkman.htm official text in russian. The same is written in article 15 Lawyer.F (talk) 19:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

2. ^ Jump up to:^{a b c d e}

Lawyer.F (talk) 14:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Concerning the categories, we can choose of of the methods: 1) to collect there just the persons who gained general titile in the Republic of Azerbaijan, Azerbaijani SSR and Azerbaijan People's Republic (1918-1920). 2) to collect all the generals who originated from the toponym of Azerbaijan, nevertheless the ethnic belonging. The last one is more attractive. Lawyer.F (talk) 16:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

No, the last one is not more attractive. We're not going to add "Azerbaijani general" pre-1918. The toponym is the name of a historic region home to many ethnicities since the Late Antiquity, nothing to do with ethnicity. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

I don't mind that the toponym is the name of a historic region home to many ethnicities. I cannot say that all generals of the Republic of Azerbaijan are ethnically turks. NO. moreover, the vast majority of them are kurds, if we go deeper. Lawyer.F (talk) 17:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Doesn't change the fact that it's inaccurate to add it to pre-1918 figures. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

all links ypu mentioned are inccurate that proven by the official state documentation. Lawyer.F (talk) 17:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Despite that you called "schooler" so unprofessional writers, who can state that "Until 1918, when the Musavat regime decided to name the newly independent state Azerbaijan, this designation had been used exclusively to identify the Iranian province of Azerbaijan" or something like that, who, supposedly never seen a single legal document like international conventions, you also focused your negative to me, writing that: ‘they are more reliable than you’. Nonetheless, I have never depicted myself as a source of information. Therefore, the mentioned comment was not justice and far from being fair.

What was mentioned by my, is just your links go against the law. All Seljuc, Safavid, Afshar and Qajar officials up to 1828 definitely have to be considers as the leaders of Turkic word and part of the history of modern people of Azerbaijan (both, north and south). If you are going to consider themselves also as part of the modern people of IIR (like period of Khalifate in modern Iran or Alexander), it is understandable; but as a history historical (ancient) Iran or as a continuation of Achaemenid or Sasanids, that is unprofessional, but its your choice. We can find a million tons of books about that, including wiki source. However, it is fruitless. You will never change your mind. I guess, you have been educated in Iran and have never been educated somewhere else. I have never been educated in Caucasus or in Turkish states and ethnically mixed with Kurdish, Deylem, Turkish and so on.

Referring to the international covenants I fully proved that all your “scholars” just unfamiliar with the facts. I can show you the many researchers, books, materials, but that would change nothing in your or in my point of view.

I see you are accustomed to state something unprofessional. Therefore, I’ll do what I consider the trues. Please don’t comment me anymore. If you disagree, you can block me or my account or do whatever you want. Bye Lawyer.F (talk) 15:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Mardakert District (NKAO)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mardakert District (NKAO), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:09, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Competence is required. This is the result of the evidence presented against you at WP:ANI. Cullen328 (talk) 07:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lawyer.F (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

it was provocative statement from the user historyofiran, who wrote something like 'reliable than you', mentioned myself. I found it like aggressive and personal. Therefore, my reply was adequate. Lawyer.F (talk) 09:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

See WP:GAB to understand how to write an unblock request with a possibility of success. --Yamla (talk) 11:46, 21 March 2024 (UTC)