User talk:Mactographer/Archive-2

IP Address

Maybe this will save you from logging out and back in next time: My IP Address. :) --Dan East 10:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP meetup

	In the area? You're invited to
	San Francisco Meetup 3
	Date: September 16th, 2007
	Place: Yerba Buena Gardens, 3pm
	San Francisco Meetup 2

-- phoebe/(talk) 07:34, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Bridges-logo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Bridges-logo.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 21:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ward-armed&dan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ward-armed&dan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversies pages

FYI, Controversies of Rudy Giuliani has now been dismantled, with its legitimate contents disbursed among the appropriate Giuliani articles and its unworthy contents junked. See Talk:Controversies of Rudy Giuliani for more. This is pertinent to your concern that it was unfair that Republican candidates had such articles and Hillary Clinton did not. I hope that someone dismantles the Mike_Huckabee#Controversy section as well. Wasted Time R 18:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I spoke a bit too soon ... another editor wants it revived and it's now at AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversies of Rudy Giuliani. Wasted Time R 22:20, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on Talk:Hillary Clinton

Mactographer, I would also suggest that you apologize to the editors of the Hillary Rodham Clinton article for your rather uneducated comment about them being sockpuppets of the Clinton campaign.[1] If you take a look at the edit history for the Giuliani and McCain articles you will find that many of the editors on the Clinton article and talk page were also the ones (particularly Wasted Time R) that were in large part responsible for the dismantling of the Criticism section and/or articles in those articles. What you see reflected on the Clinton article and on many other politician articles, is a general dislike of criticism sections that has been applied across party lines and without regard to a person's political beliefs and/or practices. --Bobblehead ^(rants) 23:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: user-requested deletions

Sure thing! Generally, pages and images are deleted "on sight" if the sole author requests so. Just dump a list of what you want gone on my talk page. east.718 at 00:06, December 25, 2007

OK, I've removed all the images on enwiki. I am not a Commons admin, but am trying to get a hold of one right now; if the pictures aren't gone in a couple hours, you'll have to file deletion requests on Commons, and I do not have any idea as to what their procedures are. east.718 at 00:35, December 25, 2007

I am a Commons Administrator. east718 told me of your request and I went ahead and removed the images from the Commons. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 04:39, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Let me know if there's anything else you need help with. east.718 at 03:43, December 28, 2007

Copyright problem

Another editor has listed Image:Worship-leader.jpg as having a copyright problem. There has been a discussion here. For simplicity I've pasted the discussion from that page below:

Image:Worship-leader.jpg- Although this is the author's own work it does appear to include copyrighted material. Namely the lyrics to a song which has restrictions on reproduction. For example for a church to use those lyrics on a projector system as shown they must have a valid CCLI licence. Although done in good faith, I am unsure as to whether the appearance of the lyrics within this photograph constitute copyright infringement or not. I put a note on the image's talk page some time ago.Crimperman (talk) 13:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, this is a free work that incorporates non-free lyrics. However, the use is minimal, and certainly counts as fair use under U.S. law. I think it's best to tag the image with both {{GFDL} (for the photo itself) and {{fair use in}} (for the lyrics), and then not use it in user space. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 00:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible for you to add the fair-use template to the image page? You will also need to remove it from your user page. Please let me know if you have any questions. Cheers--DO11.10 (talk) 03:33, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

huckabee 44/54

Check the List of Governors of Arkansas. Orval Faubus (what a name) was 44. Huckabee just had another one of those things where sounds came out of his mouth, but they weren't sensible when he said 44. If you look, the Huckabee article already has quotes from him about the frequency of such incidents. ThuranX (talk) 12:25, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reporting your personal attack. ThuranX (talk) 16:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I made no personal attack against you. Good luck with that. ThuranX (talk) 05:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Stonehill-edge-of-the-world.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Stonehill-edge-of-the-world.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DJ-I-surrender.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:DJ-I-surrender.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Camera-phone-selfport.jpeg

A tag has been placed on Image:Camera-phone-selfport.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Camera-phone-selfport.jpeg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Lego K^ontribs T^alkM 23:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A picture

this is about the picture you captured the one with the horse at the renaissance fair do you happen to Know what breed of horse it is? thanks ElectricalExperiment 21:00, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Hello

Hello Mactographer! I'd like to tell you, don't give up the fight and don't give up hope. Stand strong in the Word of God (like the Founding Fathers did) and continue to tell the truth. Be bold! In case you ever wanted to contact me, my e-mail is the00cheat@gmail.com. I'm not on Wikipedia much, so I don't really respond to messages, lol. -ApJ (talk) 06:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area roll call

Hello from WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area!

As part of a recent update to our project main page we are conducting a roll call to check which members are still active and interested in working on bay area related content. If you are still interested in participating, simply move your username from the inactive section of the participant list to the active section. I hope you will find the redesigned project pages helpful, and I wanted to welcome you back to the project. If you want you can take a look at the newly redesigned:

As well as the existing pages:

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, and add it to your watchlist, if it isn't already.

Again, hi! -Optigan13 (talk) 07:48, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Knight

David Ball, thank you for your beautiful picture File:Modern-Knight.jpg. I make a new version for text illustration (File:Modern-Knight 2.jpg). Encore merci.PRA (talk) 16:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Bridges Community Church

Bridges does not seem to meet wiki's notability guideline WP:NRVE. In order to be considered notable, it must have received significant coverage from third-parties. As the articles creator, are you aware of sources that would establish notability? thanks for your help and contributions to WP. Atokoy (talk) 07:16, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:In-the-volume-of-the-book-cover.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:In-the-volume-of-the-book-cover.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 23:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

question

This picture's description says that it shows Pyramid Lake. The title, however, says Lake Castaic. Someone on Talk:Pyramid Lake (California) wanted to make sure that this was indeed Pyramid Lake. Could you confirm that? Griffinofwales (talk) 16:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Queen Victoria Albert 1854.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Queen Victoria Albert 1854.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria photo

Hello, my friend! Well, I took it from the new official flick account created by the Royal family. Here: [2] Good luck! --Lecen (talk) 11:58, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Mactographer/Archive-2! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 03:28, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bridges-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bridges-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stones, henges, userpages, and photographs

This is the part of my original response on Talk:Stonehenge which I felt strayed from the matter at hand there. No particular order:

Badger Drink logorrhoea

The high priority you place on a userpage is utterly absurd - this is an encyclopedia, not Facebook.
Discover is a magazine, written by and for people who already know what Stonehenge is - as such, they're more open to artistic flair. To put it another way, in terms I have no doubt you'll understand: The qualities which make a good senior picture are completely different from the qualities that make a good goth-rock album cover (unless you're going for an ironic effect in the latter, of course). Van Gogh didn't do presidential portraits, James Joyce didn't write for the front page of the New York Times.
When I originally labelled your work as "amateurish", I was speaking in the context of this being an encyclopedia. Beethoven's 5th is an amateurish way to depict an E-flat. It struck me as the contribution of an anonymous editor, or editor who had not been with the project for very long - someone eager to contribute something, anything, even if that some/anything was more fitting for a flickrstream than an encyclopedia. Wiki-amateur, photography-pro. I stand by that assessment, for the reasons I outlined in my first post to Talk:Stonehenge. You can repeat "rule of thirds" as often as you like, the facts remain that there's more ground than sky, and while the eye is eventually drawn to Stonehenge itself, it doesn't fall upon it naturally as it would if the photographer had stopped blindly following the letter of the teachings he learned in photography 101, and actually centered the stupid rocks in the stupid viewfinder like most of us "barbarian heathens" would if given a camera.
Photographers who worry about straight-out-of-camera (SOOC) shots can be largely lumped into two categories: 1) those who are insecure about their abilities to truly capture the moment and feel they must resort to smoke and Photoshop-mirrors (I'd put the average 15 year old on Deviantart in this category), and 2) those who are looking for an artistic effect, an emotional reaction by the viewer; as opposed to an honest representation of their subject. This is the category I'd place the Stonehenge-Green file under. I'm speaking in terms of digital photography, digital display here - analog is a whole different story, as is physical print media.
I resent the accusation that I recruited help, or personally got the page locked on the WRONGVERSION. People can disagree with you without being part of some vast conspiracy orchestrated by a redlinked non-entity such as myself. Grow up.
I'm not quite sure how two histrionic posts to my talk page are at all relevant to this discussion (the first was by an editor whose off-kilter approach to editing is well-documented on his talk-page, the second was someone rankled to their very core over my saying that the phrase "an human" only made sense in scouse-speak), but you keep bringing them up as if they are. I would venture that, if anything, they're proof that there are people on this project far crazier than you and I combined.

Have a nice day (though it's hard not to have a nice day out in the Bay Area - spent two years in Santa Cruz myself, it's the voice of experience) - Badger Drink (talk) 18:25, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I find it rather surprising that a self-professed "Christian" would have a hard time reconciling a happy postscript tacked on to a bunch of schizophrenic bullshit, but such is life. Badger Drink (talk) 08:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:08, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Need Permission to Use Edinburgh Castle Photo

Hi,

I am working on a show for The History Channel called "Ancient Aliens." I wanted to use a photo of yours of Edinburgh Castle, but I need the correct credit. You said the photo was free to use with the right credit. Do you want us to credit "mactographer?" Thank you! Please email me at: producerzan@yahoo.com Suzanne — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.183.47.250 (talk) 21:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Picture nomination

I nominated a picture of yours here. I realize it's a little late in the game to be asking, but the image description is a little confusing, this is your picture, right? --TimL (talk) 21:50, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim. I've stopped playing much here on Wiki cuz it's way too political for me, so I just found this message from you. Yes, I took the photo. Actually, it's a series of photos composited into ONE photo. Good luck with your nomination. Glad you liked it anyway. --Mactographer (talk) 07:55, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for letting you know about your nomination

I was not aware that you were incapable of handling or even witnessing constructive criticism. You failed to notice that it was not I who brought up any criticism, merely took it into account. It's unfortunate you can't be civil, is something stressful going on in your life? Adios! --TimL (talk) 21:10, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]