User talk:Mad357

August 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Sambandam—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 17:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sambandam. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sambandam, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sambandam was changed by Mad357 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862475 on 2020-08-08T03:49:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What nonsense are you writing in this page . This is palyndry form of sambhandam . Actually is is not practised by nair . Please try to understand Mad357 (talk) 05:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sambandham. Outlander^07@talk 09:36, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Nair Brigade. Outlander^07@talk 18:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What wrong I did , Nair brigade is the official army of Travancore. Personal body guards are part of Travancore Nair Brigade . Not only for Marthanda Varma Mad357 (talk) 06:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do it

I have something to discuss something about some pages we need to expand. (Redacted). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4073:2E93:C25A:961:C635:DD35:4ECD (talk) 15:52, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mad357, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mad357! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:44, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did anything Materialscientist , i only add more clarification to the page as I also referred more information from many books related to the heading Mad357 (talk) 18:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Nagavanshi, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, I'm Outlander07. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Koyi Thampuran have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Outlander^07@talk 16:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful about what you do on Wikipedia articles. Continuous disruptive editing may lead to loss of editing privileges and to indefinite block. Thanks, Outlander^07@talk 17:17, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Nair Saheb per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nair Saheb. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 20:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I write true history with references . Unblock Mad357 (talk) 07:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mad357 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wrote true information with referenceMad357 (talk)

Decline reason:

What's going on at Koyi Thampuran? Three accounts, all on the same IP address, were edit warring to remove the same content. You need to explain how that happened. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Arun mohan is not my sockpupet . My account has been lost so I created new account Mad357 (talk) 07:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Koyi thampuran accidently second time . Actually it is the history of Later venad throne , not koyo thampuran

Mad357 (talk) 09:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mad357 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First I edited koyi thampuran because it is not the history of koyi thampuran , later I accidentally edited the history , it is not to vandalize . I really sorry , i always make good contents . Sorry if I made any mistake Mad357 (talk) 12:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on your commentary here, I do not believe you have the competence that is required to edit the English Wikipedia. Your explanations are not clear enough for me to gauge whether or not you understand why you were blocked and what you will do different going forward. only (talk) 19:58, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please remove by block Mad357 (talk) 18:21, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I only edited the right information. The information in Koyi Thampuran history is not the history of Koyi Thampuran i can refer you text which points it out . Mad357 (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think wikipedia go for orginal information/ history . If a person make false information on a subject and I removed it how it became vandalism ?!. Mad357 (talk) 13:13, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]