Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.
successive reverting is against the rules. WP:revert. Additionally it says at WP:albums and WP:record charts about seperate tables for different charting years. Sales need to be verifiable and so stating that it appeared on the BBC without a proper source is not sufficient especially since BPI says its platinum (which equals 300,000 + sales). I am going to undo you edit and be warned if you revert again you will break the WP:3RR rule which is punishable by a ban. In future use the discussion page. Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Frankie Sandford, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. XXXantiusereh?18:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted your edit because I can see no use whatever in having the same information in two separate articles; it's unnecessary and a nightmare to keep consistent. Rodhullandemu21:03, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Cheryl Cole. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 00:20, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You either don't choose to learn or you just don't care about Wikipedia policies or talk page communication. In this edit [1] you again added unsourced and incorrect sales certifications to Cheryl Cole discography. Enough is enough.
You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 1 month, for disruptive editing, see below. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
Even after numerous warnings, here [3] you added an 11th column to the table again, against consensus at WP:DISCOG
Here [4] you changed the country in the succession table without verifying any of the before/after info and you just removed the country that was there, with no explanation.
These kinds of edits are a disruption. Your blocks are getting longer and it doesn't seem as if you care to acknowledge any Talk Page communication or make any attempts to help the Wikipedia process or adhere to any policies or style guidelines. - eo (talk) 16:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Im very sorry but when i added norway singles chart becasue it was nubmer 1 i was meant to get rid of italy signles chart because it was the lowest peak and norway was very high also in fight for this love i got ride of the contry beacause there was to off them and it actually was meant to be norways nubmer one single i am very sorry and hope you unblock me and i Promise i will never do it again
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hurt (Christina Aguilera song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I see you've been warned and blocked multiple times for this, so consider this a final warning, again. Do not introduce unsourced material, or even worse, material against the available sources. If the source says Gold, leave it at Gold, not Platinum.Muhandes (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. When you recently edited United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duffy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Why did you remove Sugababes from the Music section of United Kingdom? The band had number one hits in many countries like New Zealand, Ireland, Denmark, and Austria and sold 10 million albums. If you remove it again I will notify an administrator. Till I Go Home (talk) 09:00, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sugababes discography. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Girls Aloud, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.