User talk:Magicmondays

Speedy deletion nomination of Christine Hogarth

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christine Hogarth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Boleyn (talk) 20:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Magicmondays, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:49, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

info for the Hogarth article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Christine_Hogarth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Megalibrarygirl contact Rosiestep or Megalibrarygirl

A belated welcome and note

Hello, Magicmondays and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Yngvadottir (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi Magicmondays: I see you got a welcome with an invitation to the Teahouse, which is indeed a good place for new editors to ask questions, with a lot of friendly people who are good at explaining our sometimes arcane rules and conventions, including the editing syntax. But nobody gave you a full "welcome" template with links so you can look up the rules and guidelines. Here's one, a bit late, and you're very welcome here.

Regarding Christine Hogarth, I declined the speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Christine Hogarth and have done some work on it, including re-ordering it and creating sections, identifying the sources, and (re)adding her campaign page as an external link (I can't see the deleted versions of the article). That was the only place I could find anything about her education, although I found a radio interview with her that may add more about her; I can't use that because I don't have sound. The article is pretty slim as a biography. One of her positions is unsourced, and there's little indication of when she did what, and where did she grow up and where did she earn her degree? Do you know of any published third-party sources for that information, including the radio interview? The relevant notability guideline determining whether she merits an article is here: notice that criteria 2 and 3, the applicable ones, both require substantial coverage of her as an individual. As an encyclopedia, we have to be strict about not allowing Wikipedia to be used as an advertising platform; see here and in fact that whole page. That means in practice that there is a far higher chance of an article on a political candidate being judged acceptable if it contains information about the person's life, rather than only summarizing their résumé; this, plus the way the article was structured close to sources that are about her candidacy, is triggering the judgement by some editors that the article is promotional in intent. I am not Megalibrarygirl or Rosiestep, but I hope my work on the draft and this explanation will be helpful. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Christine Hogarth

Draft:Christine Hogarth, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Christine Hogarth and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Christine Hogarth during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 20:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:26, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Is this supposed to be ironic? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:12, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Christine Hogarth concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Christine Hogarth, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 17 May 2018 (UTC)