User talk:Malaylampur

please message me on weekdays only

Malaylampur, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Malaylampur! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 23 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Template:Barelvi page, your edit caused a duplicate page number error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

NO RULES WERE BROKEN SIR PLEASE REFER TO THE BOOK OF ASIAN STUDIES. Malaylampur (talk) 01:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Wow, you're seriously arguing with a robot? This is beyond ridiculous.

Look man, virtually every interaction you've had with other users on this website involves you flaming other people. Of your 12 edits, 9 involve interaction with other users, 8 involve flaming and insulting others, 4 involve all caps and 1 includes profanity.

Usually new users are excused, but from all measures, you seem to be a troll just causing trouble. Cool it or I can guarantee from experience with people who act like this that you'll end up reported and, in all likelihood, banned. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Now i know why your wife left you and took the kids haha!. Malaylampur (talk) 13:53, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Create a new template

I have checked a few of sentences which you wrote about association of the two Movements Barelvi and Nahdlatul Ulama. We can design a new template about those movements which are similar or having same theology, creed and beliefs like Sufis, Ash'aris and Maturidis. The common things between Nahdlatul Ulama & Barelvis can be two of these three things, like both of them are Sufis. It's OK for me too. Second common thing could be the creed. Barelvis are Maturidis in fact. So people of Nahdlatul Ulama are may be Ash'aris or may be Maturidis. So, there could be two answers of this questions.

1. Sufis + Ash'aris = Nahdlatul Ulama
2. Sufis + Maturidis = Nahdlatul Ulama

I know Barelvis belong to second answer. (What Madhhab of Fiqh do they (Nahdlatul Ulama) follow? I don't know. But, it doesn't matter among Ahl-al-Sunnah. Four of the school of Madhhabs are fine in this Identity.) I also know about many movements around the glob which have the same creed and theology like us Barelvis. For example

1. Ahlu Sunna Waljama'a is a Sufi movement of Ah-al-Sunnah having Maturidi creed there in Somalia.
2. Nazim Al-Haqqani was a Sunni-Sufi having a large scale of popularity and hundreds of thousands disciples in many countries.
3. Fethullah Gülen is a Sufi-Sunni having similar popularity like Nazim Al-Haqqani
4. Abdulhakim Arvasi was a Sunni and his followers are still working. They have a globally famous Book-Store with the name of "Hakikat Kitabevi"

So there are many groups which have the same mentality, same thoughts, same Fiqh (or not), same creed (but some movements differ the creed but they are Sunni-Sufi still). I'm not an expert to write articles on English Wikipedia. Actually, Wikipedia is something else than what you're thinking about it. On the template of Barelvi, those things are mentioned which belong to only that movement locally or directly. Indirectly relevant things are like Nahdlatul Ulama, Nazim Al-Haqqani and many more. The relationship what you want to type on that template page of Wikipedia, does not belong to that page. This relationship can be concerned on a larger-picture. I mean with the advice of administrators/managers of Wikipedia we can think about to design a page or template about these Sunni-Sufi movements which have the same mind-set across the world & somehow their bases are connected to each other in previous centuries. We can expand the circle of research and we can also build the bridges among these Sunni-Movements. The very common thing among all of them is that they are considered "Mushrik" by Wahhabi-mind groups. So, all of these Ulema refuted the Wahhabis globally from last three centuries. Note: Senior Wikipedians are not against your mind-set. They just told you that how an encyclopedia works and how we should design it. I hope that I could understand your feelings and views and I have replied with details. So waiting for your kind advice and reply. ABDUL RAZZAQ QADRI (talk) 20:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Check this please

Muhammad al-Yaqoubi is Sunni (Sufi), Maliki and Shadhili. Imam Abul Hasan ash-Shadhili was a Sunni Maliki having Ash'ari creed. We should find the Silsila (cahin) of his Sheikh (Teacher) Abd as-Salam ibn Mashish al-Alami. There are many more things to research and collect together. Like check this template please Template:Sufism. We can either expand it or design a new one to make it more universal and acceptable for all. We also can write a long article on Wikipedia about the relationships among all these people. ABDUL RAZZAQ QADRI (talk) 21:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:Nahdlatul Ulama

A separate Template about Nahdlatul Ulama sholud be designed for its Main Figures, Ulema, Institutions and Books etc. You also must visit Portal:Sufism for more info please. ABDUL RAZZAQ QADRI (talk) 21:25, 14 November 2015 (UTC) Yes, I already have heard about Mohamed Said Ramadan Al-Bouti. Thanks! ABDUL RAZZAQ QADRI (talk) 21:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Sufi protal needs alot of work. Malaylampur (talk) 17:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

ANI thread re: user conduct

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)