From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Ulema)
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses, see Ulama (disambiguation).
Scholars at an Abbasid library. Maqamat of al-Hariri Illustration by Yahyá al-Wasiti, Baghdad 1237

Ulama (/ˈləˌmɑː/; Arabic: علماء‎‎ ʿUlamāʾ, singular عالِم ʿĀlim, "scholar", literally "the learned ones",[1] also spelled ulema; feminine: alimah (singular) and uluma (plural)) are "those recognized as scholars or authorities" in the "religious hierarchy" of the Islamic religious studies.[2][3][4] They are the guardians of legal and religious tradition in Islam. Often they are "Imams of important mosques, judges, teachers in the religious faculties of universities".[2] The term may also include the body of Muslim Islamic scholars trained in the whole body of Islamic law and in other Islamic disciplines; but it may also be used to include the village mullahs and imams on the lowest rungs of the ladder of Islamic scholarship,[citation needed] inasmuch as they correspond most closely to the class of the scribes or rabbis in Judaism.[5]

Most ulama specialize in fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence; these are known as fuqaha or muftis), and are considered the arbiters of sharia law by mainstream Muslims (though the closeness of some ulama to rulers may prevent them from being universally accepted).[citation needed] Ulama may also include specialists in other areas such as muhaddith (concerned with the study of hadith) and mufassir (concerned with tafsir of the Quran).[3]


Ulama is the plural of the word ‌‍‘alīm, which is derived from the word ‘ilm, meaning "knowledge" or "the pursuit of knowledge". However, the term has gained a special meaning beyond the plural form of ‌‍‘alīm, and is commonly used to refer to that section of the Muslim community who are "considered to be intellectual and partly aristocratic."[6] Sources used in the development of Sharia (Islamic law) such as hadith (the specialty of muhaddith), Ijma (the consensus of the ulama on a legal issue),[7] and Qias (Measuring/Analogical reason), or for Shia ulama aql (intellect), are all the province of the ulama. At times in Muslim history the ulama have even served as an informal branch of government, countervailing the power of the ruling caliph or sultan. On the other hand, the term is no longer confined to the Arabic bounds and is now taken with a broader meaning: it may refer to learned scholars regardless of their religiosity.[8]


By tradition, a scholar who had completed his madrasa studies was approved by his teacher, and given the permission for independent reasoning (ijtihad) and for the issuing of legal opinions (fatwa). The official approval was known as the ijazat attadris wa 'l-ifttd ("license to teach and issue legal opinions") from a Madrasah.[9] Through time, this practice established a chain of teachers and pupils who became teachers in their own time. Essentially, an unbroken chain of teachers ensured the authenticity of the teaching back to the Prophet Muhammad, a process called Isnād (Arabic: إسناد‎‎, "support").[10] Thus, biographical evaluation (Arabic: عِلْمُ الرِّجال‎, translit. `Ilm al-Rijāl‎), a process by which the narrators of hadith are evaluated, using both historic and religious knowledge, is regarded as the key to establishing the credibility of a doctrine.[11]

Functions and requirements[edit]

Islamic jurisprudence in the contemporary world is mainly composed of:

  • Hadith: reports of statements or actions of Muhammad, and
  • Tafseer: explanation and interpretations of the Qur'an.

Ulama study at Islamic religious schools, madrasahs, where they also teach students about Islam and other areas of study. (It is believed in Islam that every Muslim must acquire a well-rounded education in order to understand God’s religion in its entirety.)[citation needed] By the end of their education, they acquire an Ijazah, an academic degree in Islamic law and jurisprudence, a practice that dates back to the first several centuries of Islam.[citation needed] Ulama also hold seminars where they give lectures and speeches about the area of Islam in which they specialize.

In certain Muslim countries, like Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates, where there are sharia courts, Islamic clergy become judges. Therefore, one of the jobs of ulama is the interpretation and maintenance of Islamic law in such places.

In some countries, such as Saudi Arabia, Islamic clergy fulfill the role of a counsel for the king. There are also jobs for them in various governmental institutions.

There are various jobs available for the Islamic clergy at mosques. These include: leading public prayers, preaching, and delivering sermons, especially at Friday prayers. Some have made missionary activities a lifelong activity.

One of the five fundamental sources of Sharia (Islamic law) for Sunni Muslims is ijma, i.e. the consensus of the ummah (Muslim community).[12] It is based on the hadith that "My community will never agree on error"[13][14] (and other evidence), with the Ulama representing the community.[7] The last source of the Sharia is ijtihad, or the use of "independent reasoning." It is to be exerted only by those with "thorough knowledge of theology, revealed texts and legal theory (usul al-fiqh); an exceptional capacity for legal reasoning", and a "thorough knowledge of Arabic"[15]—i.e., by ulama. It is used by Shia ulama and some Sunni. (Depending on the school of jurisprudence, the ulama exercising ijma and ijtihad may only be that of the first generation of Muslims or the first three generations of Muslims; or it may include contemporary jurists and scholars of the Muslim world.[citation needed])

Sunni fuqaha or muftis usually work within a tradition (madhhab) that starts with one of five classic jurists.

Some ulama are not associated with any particular school of jurisprudence. The Salafis and Ahl-i Hadith, for example, believe that it is necessary to derive rulings directly from the Qur'an and the Hadith (Prophetic Sunnah), but they still hold the classical jurists in high esteem and take lessons from their opinions.

Many ulama have left behind them only a lifetime of mediating disputes and giving sermons; their respectable contributions did not include authorship. Other ulama have been prolific authors, writing translations of the Quran or Quranic commentaries, studies of hadith, works of philosophy, religious admonition, etc. There are enormous bodies of religious literature that form not only the substance of the courses in Islamic seminaries, but inspirational reading for the ordinary Muslim. Most of this literature has not been translated into English, but remains in its original language (usually Arabic, Urdu, Persian, or Turkish). Some has been printed; some remains in manuscript form.


Early history[edit]

The formative period of Islamic jurisprudence stretches back to the time of the early Muslim communities. In this period, jurists were more concerned with pragmatic issues of authority and teaching than with theory.[16] Progress in theory began to develop with the coming of the early Muslim jurist Muhammad ibn Idris ash-Shafi`i (767–820), who codified the basic principles of Islamic jurisprudence in his book ar-Risālah. The book details the four roots of law (Qur'an, Sunnah, ijma, and qiyas) while specifying that the primary Islamic texts (the Qur'an and the hadith) must be understood according to objective rules of interpretation derived from scientific study of the Arabic language.[17]

According to scholar Noah Feldman, under many Muslim caliphate states and later states ruled by sultans, the Ulema were regarded as the guardians of Islamic law and prevented the Caliph from dictating legal results, with the ruler and ulama forming a sort of "separation of powers" in government.[8] Laws were decided based on the Ijma (consensus) of the Ummah (community), which was most often represented by the legal scholars.[8] In many ways, classical Islamic law functioned like a constitutional law.[8]

Early modern Islamic empires[edit]

Sunni Islam of the Ottoman Empire[edit]

An Ottoman scholar.

During the Ottoman era the ulama "were perceived as the foremost element" among the constituents of the community, and often "took responsibilities in law, education, primary religious services and occasionally in bureaucracy" of the government. Traditionally, the term "ulama" was commonly applied to scholars who had "completed their madrasa training and gained an icazet (graduate degree)".[6]

After the Fall of Constantinople in 1453, the leaders and subjects of the Ottoman Empire became increasingly aware of its role as a great power of its time. This new self-awareness was associated with the idea to legitimise the new political role by means of religion. This goal was reached by linking the religious scholarship to the political system: Ottoman historians of the 15th and 16th century strived at comprehensively and selectively appropriating their own history, as can be seen in the works of Ibn Zunbul or Eyyûbî,[18] who described the deeds of the Ottoman sultans as if they had been idealised Islamic ghazi warriors.

Mehmed the Conqueror (1432–1481) founded the sahn-ı şeman or "eight colleges", which served to educate islamic law scholars, using former Christian church buildings.[10] In his 2015 study on the "second formation of Islamic law",[19] Burak has shown in detail how the Ottoman state gradually imposed upon the traditional ulama a hierarchy of "official imperial scholars“, appointed and paid by the central government. From the conquest of the Mamluk Sultanate of Cairo in 1517 onwards, the Ottoman ulama set up their own interpretation of the Sunni Hanafi doctrine which then served as the official religious doctrine of the empire. In the Ottoman Empire, the formal acknowledgment by decree of the sultan became a prerequisite to issue fatwas. In the 17th century, the annalist al-Hamawi used the expression "sultanic mufti" (al-ifta' al-sultani) to delineate the difference between the officially appointed religious leaders and those who had followed the traditional way of education.[20] Other authors at that time called the Ottoman law scholars "Hanafi of Rūm [i.e., the Ottoman Empire]" (Rūmi ḫānāfi), "Scholars of Rūm“ (ʿulamā'-ı rūm) or "Scholars of the Ottoman Empire" (ʿulamā' al-dawla al-ʿUthmaniyyā).[21] The Shaykh al-Islām (Turkish: Şeyhülislam) in Istanbul became the highest-ranking Islamic scholar within, and head of the ulama throughout the empire.[22]

The ulama in the Ottoman Empire had a significant influence over politics because it was believed that secular institutions were all subordinate to Islamic law, the Sharia (Turkish: Şeriat). The ulama were responsible for interpreting the religious law, therefore they claimed that their power superseded that of the government.[23] Within the Ottoman hierarchy of ulama, the Shaykh al-Islām held the highest rank. He exerted his influence by issuing fatwas, his written interpretations of the sharia had authority over the entire Ottoman population. In the 16th century, as the support by the ulama of the sultan and the central government was essential for shaping the still-growing empire, the importance of the office rose, and its power increased. Sultan Murad appointed a Sufi, Yayha, as his Shaykh al-Islām during this time, which led to violent disapproval. The objection to this appointment made obvious the amount of power the office had, since people were afraid he would alter the traditions and norms they were living under by issuing new fatwas.[24] As members of the Ilmiye, the imperial scholars were part of the Ottoman elite class of the Askeri, and were exempt from any taxes.[25]

However, by approving scholars and appointing them to offices, over time the sultan gained considerable influence over the religious scholars, although he still, as a Muslim, had to submit to the Islamic law.[26] Even the Shaykh al-Islām was subordinate to the sultan; his rank, like the ranks of the muftis, was described as a "service" (Turkish: hizmet) or „rank“ (Turkish: rütbe or paye), to which a candidate was appointed or elevated.[27] Sometimes, the sultans made use of their power: In 1633, Murad IV gave order to execute the Shaykh al-Islām Ahīzāde Ḥüseyin Efendi. In 1656, Shaykh al-Islām Ḥocazāde Mesʿud Efendi was sentenced to death by sultan Mehmed IV.[28]

The Ottoman literature genre of the "rank order" (Turkish: tabaḳat, from Arabic: ṭabaqāt‎‎) and the "biografic lexicon" (Turkish: Eş-şakaiku’n, from Arabic: As-Shaqa'iq‎‎) compiled the biographies of scholars in such a way that a concise and coherent tradition was created of the doctrine and structure of the Ottoman imperial scholarship, a process not dissimilar to the traditional biographical evaluation. The work of the Shaykh al-Islām Kemālpaşazade (d. 1534) "Treaty on the rank orders of the mujtahid" (Risala fi ṭabaqāt al-mujtahidiīn) was continuously quoted until the 18th century, and occasionally translated into other languages. Kınalızāde ʿAli Çelebi (d. 1572), in his "Genealogy of the Hanafi School“ (Ṭabaqāt al-Ḥanafiyya), established a seamless chain of tradition from Abu Hanifa up to the Ottoman Shaykh al-Islām Kemālpaşazade. Kınalızāde wrote that his work must not only be understood as the historiography of the Hanafi madhhab, but explicitly that it should be consulted in case of eventual disagreements within the school of law. This exemplifies his purpose to establish a canon of Hanafi law within the Ottoman imperial scholarship. Maḥmud b. Süleyman Kefevi (d. 1582) excludes from his compilation such scholars and their works which disagreed with the Ottoman Hanafi school, thus underlining the exclusivity of the Ottoman imperial school of law,[29] which modern Ottomanists termed the "Ottoman Islam".[30]

The first and most important compilation of biographies (Turkish: Eş-şakaiku’n, from Arabic: Al-Shaqa'iq‎‎) was the "Garden of anemones of the scholarship of the Ottoman Empire" (Al-shaqa'iq al-nuʿmāniyya fi ʿulamā' al-dawla al-ʿUthmaniyyā) by Aḥmād b. Muṣṭafā Taşköprüzāde (1494–1561). The term "al-nuʿmāniyya" (literally: anemones) can be understood as an allusion to the nuʻmaniyya brotherhood, which denotes the name by which the Ottoman learned elite was known within the Hanafi madhhab.[31] Taşköprüzāde relates the individual biographies to the reigns of the Ottoman sultans, and thus combines Islamic scholarship with the history of the Ottoman imperial dynasty "because this work was compiled under the shadow of their rule („dawla“)." To emphasize his point, he wrote his book in elaborate, classic arabic language.[29] While Taşköprüzāde was still living, Turkish translations of his works were published: in 1560, Belgradlı Muhtesibzade Muhammed Haki published his translation under the title Hada’iq al-Rayhan; at the same time, Aşık Çelebi (1520–1572) published his own translation. More editions followed during the 16th century, for example by Muḥammad al-Majdî in 1586.[32]

Other scholars wrote sequels to Taşköprüzāde's book. Aşık Çelebi dedicated his "Sequel to the lexicon" (Dhayl al-Shaqa’iq)[33] to the Great Vizier Sokollu Mehmed Pasha. Ali ben Bali Cevheri (1527–1584) explicitly notes that his "String of pearls of the notables of Rūm" (al-ʻIqd al-Manzum fi Dhikr Afazil al-Rum) was meant as a sequel to Taşköprüzādes work, to whom he appoints the prominent position of the "centerpiece of the string" within the "row of pearls" of the Ottoman scholars. Ali ben Bali also published his sequence of biographies in accordance with the reigns of the sultans, as exemplified by Taşköprüzāde. He also wrote in elegant Arabic, and extensively cites poems and other texts written by the scholars whose biographies he wrote, in order to underline their high rank amongst the arabic-islamic writers.[34]

The development of Sunni Islam as an instrument of the reason of state in the Ottoman Empire is closely linked to sultan Süleyman I and his kazasker and later Schaykh al-Islām Ebussuud Efendi. Ebussuud Efendi compiled an imperial book of law (kanunnāme), in which he construed the Ottoman law from Islamic law according to the Hanafi madhhab.[35] Edicts based on an Islamic scholar's fatwa were not easily renounced, and had the potential to considerably strengthen a sultan's reign. Ebussuud also provided a reason why the government could own land, or could levy and increase taxes, as the government was responsible for the protection of the common goods of all Muslims.[36]

Shi'a: state religion of Safavid Persia[edit]

Shaikh Ṣāfī ad-Dīn Isḥāq Ardabīlī (1252–1334) was the founder of the Safaviyya tariqa. Safi ad-Din's great-great grandson Ismail, who from 1501 onwards ruled over the Persian Empire, was the founder of the Safavid dynasty. Shah Ismail I proclaimed the Twelver Shi'a as the new Persian state religion. To propagate the Safavid faith, he invited ulama from Lebanon and Syria.[37][38] The royal family claimed descendency from Musa al-Kadhim, the Seventh Imam, in order to legitimize their rule. After the Persian defeat against the Ottoman Empire in the Battle of Chaldiran (1514), the theocratic unity of religious and political power was challenged by the ulama. Ahmad ibn Muhammad Ardabili (d. 1585) claimed that shah Abbas I was only the steward of the imam, so that the ulama had the right to decide about the legitimacy of the stewardship. Later on, the Shi'ite ulama declared that only a mujtahid could become the legitimate steward of the Twelfth Imam.

19th century[edit]

By the beginning of the 19th century, the Ottoman ulama still retained their political influence. When sultan Selim III tried to reform the Ottoman army, the ulama opposed his plans, which they rejected as an apostasy from Islam. Consequently, his reform failed. However, Selims successor Mahmud II (r. 1808–1839) was more successful: He called the new troops, organised according to European models, by the name "Victorious army of Muhammad" (Asâkir-i Mansure-i Muhammediye). By doing so, he was able to overcome the accusation of apostasy and secure the ulama's support.[39] Mahmuds reforms created a new imperial elite class who spoke Western European languages and were knowledgeable of the Western European societies and their political systems. As the political and economic pressure increased on the Ottoman Empire in the course of the 19th century, this new elite carried on the sultan's reforms and helped initiating a new era of reform, the Tanzimat. In parallel, the political influence of the ulama was circumvented and reduced step by step. A ministry for religious endowments was created in order to control the finances of the vakıf. Thus, the ulama lost direct control over their finances, which significantly reduced their capacity to exert political influence.[39]

In Iran, the Persian Qajar dynasty, in particular Naser al-Din Shah Qajar (r. 1848–1896), whose reign paralleled that of the Ottoman sultans of the Tanzimat time, failed at obtaining central control over the ulama. The Shiite scholars retained their political influence on the Persian society. They also maintained unrestricted access to the financial resources from the religious endowments. In addition, the Islamic Zakat tax was paid to individual imams and not to state-sponsored tax collectors. Both their religious influence and their financial means allowed the Shiite ulama to act, at times, against the shah.[40] Thus, under the Qajar dynasty, the ulama provided a source of religious legitimacy and served as interpreters of religious law in a dual legal system where the state administered law based on custom (`urf).[41]

20th century[edit]

Quran studies class in the Wazir Khan Mosque in Lahore

The 20th century was marked by a considerable loss of authority and influence of the ulama in most Islamic states. Many secular Arab governments attempted to break the influence of the ulama after their rise to power. Religious institutions were nationalized and the system of waqf "religious endowments", which constituted the classical source of income for the ulama, was abolished. Indonesia, in contrast, began witnessing a revival of ulama activity which culminated in 1926 in the founding of the Nahdlatul Ulama, today one of the world's largest Muslim organizations.

In Turkey, the Presidency of Religious Affairs (Turkish: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı, or Diyanet) was established in 1924 in article 136 of the Constitution of Turkey by the Grand National Assembly of Turkey as a successor to the office of the Shaykh ul-Islam after the abolition of the Ottoman Caliphate.[42] From 1925 onwards, the traditional dervish tekkes and Islamic schools were dissolved. Famous convents like the Tekke of the Mevlevi order in Konya were secularized and turned into museums.[43] Islamic schools were dissolved and replaced by state-controlled religious schools in the 1950s and 1960s.

In Iran, contrary to many other Islamic countries, the Shi'a ulama had maintained their religious authority together with considerable sources of income by waqf endowments and the zakat tax. Thus, they maintained their ability to exert political pressure. Between 1905 and 1911, a coalition of ulama, bazaari, and some radical reformers incited the Persian Constitutional Revolution, which led to the establishment of the parliament (majlis) of Iran during the Qajar Dynasty.[44][45] The Islamic Revolution in Iran was led by a senior Shia cleric—the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini—who established an Islamic Republic whose constitution calls for a cleric as the country's Supreme Ruler.

In 1961, Gamal Abdel Nasser put the Al-Azhar University, one of the highest Islamic intellectual authorities, under the direct control of the state. "Azharis were given military uniforms and found themselves marching in step under the orders of army officers."[46] After the independence of Algeria, President Ahmed Ben Bella also deprived the Algerian ulama of their power. Baathist repression in Iraq led to a drop of enrollment in the Shia holy cities of Iraq from 12,000 students in the early 1900s to only 600 scholars and students in 1977.[47]

Later in the 20th century the Islamic revival led to a resurgence of the power of the traditional ulama in at least some countries:[48]

When in the 1980s and 1990s the inner-Islamic conflict escalated in Pakistan between Sunnite and Shiite sectarians, Islamic organizations represented the religious and political frontiers, and spread their ideas in the madrasas which they sponsored. Graduates (talib) from North Pakistani madrasas like "Mullah" Mohammed Omar played a role in the establishment of the Afghan Taliban regime as well as in the development of the radical Islamic terrorism.[49] Under the pressure of Islamic terrorism, the traditional Islamic educational system together with their ulama came into general disregard within the Western world.[50]

However, for many people living in the poorer Islamic countries, the madrasa system, privately sponsored by foreign aid often constitutes their only access to some form of education and social rise.[51] Saudi Arabian humanitarian organizations use the madrasas they sponsor to spread their wahhabitic doctrine,[52] whilst Shiite madrasas are frequently influenced by the Islamic Republic of Iran.[53] Insufficient state control over the educational institutions and the frequently insufficient qualification of the teachers remain an issue, as does the ideologic indoctrination and the future professional perspectives of the graduates.[54]

Ulama and Muslim modernity[edit]

The West[edit]

Starting in the first half of the 19th century, direct contacts began and gradually increased between members of the ulama and modern Western Europe. The Egyptian alim Rifa'a al-Tahtawi (1801–1873) was amongst the first members of the ulama who travelled to Europe. As a religious counsellor to a delegation by the Egyptian khedive Muhammad Ali Pasha he stayed in Paris from 1826 to 1831. His report "The Extraction of Gold or an Overview of Paris" (Taḫlīṣ al-ibrīz fī talḫīṣ Bārīz) (1849) included some outlines of future reforms and potential improvements in his native country. Although al-Tahtawi had gone through the traditional education of an alim, his interest focused on modern French concepts of administration and economy. He only referred to Islam in order to emphasize that Muslims can adopt practical knowledge and insights from Europe. As such, at-Tahtawis report reflects the political efforts of Muhammad Ali Pasha, who did not intend to reform al-Azhar university, but aimed at building an independent educational system sponsored by his government.[55]

Hayreddin Pasha (1822/3–1890) was an Ottoman Tunisian alim and statesman who reformed the administration and jurisdiction of the province. He was able to explain his ideas in French (Réformes nécessaires aux États musulmans – Necessary reforms of the Muslim states. Paris, 1868), which he had learned whilst representing his sovereign Ahmad Bey at the court of Napoleon III from 1852 to 1855. In contrast to al-Tahtawi, Hayreddin Pasha used the religious concept of the Muslim collective interest (maṣlaḥa) to make his point, thereby applying the idea of ijtihad to public affairs.[55]

Positions comparable to the Western Islamic ulama were also taken in the Eastern parts of the Islamic world by Syed Ahmad Khan, the pioneering Muslim modernist in South Asia, and Jamāl al-Dīn al-Afghānī. The latter is regarded as the mentor of Pan-Islamism, but also as one of the founders of the political Islam and of the late 19th and 20th century Salafi movement.

The Egyptian Grand Mufti Muḥammad ʿAbduh (1849–1905), who was granted the degree of 'Alim by al-Azhar university in 1877, was the first who used the term Islāh in order to denote political and religious reforms. Until 1887 he edited together with al-Afghānī the newspaper al-ʿUrwa al-Wuthqā ("The firm bond"). The gazette widely spread the pan-islamistic concept of Islam representing a religious bond which was believed to be stronger than nationality or language. From 1876 on, ʿAbduh edited the newspaper al-Ahrām. Since 1898, he also edited, together with Rashīd Ridā (1865–1935), the newspaper al-Manār ("The Beacon"),[56] in which he further developed his ideas. al-Manār appeared in print for almost 40 years and was read throughout the Islamic world.[55]

ʿAbduh understood Islah as a concept of "reform of mankind" (iṣlāḥ nauʿ al-insān).[57] In his works, he emphasized the special importance of a reform of the traditional madrasa system, which was taken to disadvantage by the parallel establishment of the secular, state-sponsored educational system in Egypt. He strove at reconciling the traditional and modern educational systems, thereby justifying from the point of view of Islam the introduction of modern institutions by the national state. He referred to the Islamic concept of the collective interest or common good of the Muslim community (maṣlaḥa), to which he accorded overarching importance (al-maṣlaḥa shar) in the interest of his fellow Muslims. The concept of islāh gained special relevance for the future, as it strives at understanding and justifying all aspects of modern life from the Islamic doctrine.[55]

After ʿAbduhs death in 1905 Rashīd Ridā continued editing "al-Manār" on his own. In 1924, he published a collection of writings by some ulama of Najd: Maǧmūʿat al-ḥadiṭ an-naǧdīya.[58] Thus, the teachings of the Yemeni alim Muhammad ash-Shawkani (1759–1839), which had already been discussed since the 1880s, gained greater publicity. Likewise, the writings of the Hanbali scholar Ibn Taymiyyah (1263–1328) came to attention again. Ibn Taymiyyah's doctrine provided a link between the wahhabiyya and parts of the salafiyya movements.[59] The theological differences between the two movements were altogether too large for a complete union of the two doctrines. However, the opening of the Salafi movement towards Wahhabism helped to reconcile the latter with the Islamic public after king Ibn Saud's invasion of the Hijaz in 1924. Central Arabian militia (Iḫwān) had occupied and looted the holy towns of Mecca and Medina, thereby destroying monuments which they considered pagan ("shirk"). Starting with the Pan-Islamic Congress in Mecca in 1926, the pro-Saudi movement developed into one of the most relevant currents of Islamic thought.

The East[edit]

In 1912, the Muhammadiyah organization was founded in Yogyakarta,[60] which, together with Nahdlatul Ulama ("Reawakening of the ulama"), founded in 1926, form the two largest Muslim organizations in the world.[61] Since the 1930s, their religious boarding schools ("pesantren") also taught mathematics, natural sciences, English and history. Since the 1980, the Nahdlatul Ulama schools also offered gerees in economy, jurisdiction, paedagogical and medical sciences. In the 1990s, under their leader Abdurrahman Wahid, the organization adopted an anti-fundamentalistic doctrine, teaching democracy and pluralism.[62]

Dar ul-Ulum Deoband, Uttar Pradesh, India

Darul Uloom Deoband, next to al-Azhar one of the most influential madrasas, was founded in the city of Deoband, Uttar Pradesh, in 1867. Initially, the intention of the school was to help Indian Muslims, who had become subjects of the British Empire after 1857, to lead their lives according to Islamic law. The Deobandi propagate a Sunni Islam of the Hanafi school, which was the most prevalent madhhab in South Asia. Still today, they aim at a revival of the Islamic society and education. Following the example of Deoband, thousands of madrasas were founded during the late 19th century which adopted the Deobandi way of studying fundamental texts of Islam and commenting on Quran and Hadith. By referring back to traditional Islamic scholars, the Deobandi School aims at defending the traditional Islamic madhhab, especially the Hanafi, against critcism which arose from other Islamic schools like the Ahl-i Hadith.[63] During the 1990s, the Afghan taliban also referred to the Deoband School.[64] Ashraf Ali Thanwi (1863–1943) is one of the most prominent teachers of Darul Uloom Deoband. Thanwi initiated and edited mulit-volume encyclopedic commentaries on the Quran. However, he was also able to reach out to a larger audience: His book Bahishti Zewar, which is still widely read in South Asia, as it details, amongst other topics, the proper conduct and beliefs for Muslim women.[65]

Ahl-i Hadith is a movement which emerged in North India in the mid-19th century. By rejecting taqlid (following legal precedent) and favoring ijtihad (independent legal reasoning) based on the foundational scriptures of Islam, they oppose the traditional madhhab and criticize their reliance on legal authorities other than the traditional texts.[66] The Ahl-i Hadith was the first organization which printed and spread the works of Muhammad ash-Shawkani, whose writings did also influence the doctrine of the Salafi movement in the Arab Middle East and world-wide.[67]

Modern challenges[edit]

When book printing was first introduced into the Islamic world in the 16th century Ottoman Empire, the ulama opposed to the new technique, as the Quran reading as well as the oral tradition of knowledge were considered the best ways of teaching. However, in the first quarter of the 19th century, printing presses emerged again in the Islamic world. Printed books and, in particular, newspapers, reached an audience much larger than could be reached by personal interaction.[68] Other media like the electrical telegraph, and later on, radio, television and the internet improved the communication between distant parts of the Islamic world. This posed a challenge to the ulama, as a new class of intellectuals, often educated in Western, or Westernized, institutions, arose and started thinking about their religion.

Some opinions from within the Muslim world have criticized the lack of scientific training of the ulama, and argued that those proficient in the sciences should qualify for this title.[69] In Egypt, the Al-Azhar University has begun to introduce scientific and practical subjects in its traditional theological colleges to help the ulama face the challenges of the modern world. N. Hanif states:

A religious hierarchy on the defensive against nationalists, secularists, modernists, apologists fundamentalists and romantics, and, possibly even in the bad books of the government of the day, trained only to transmit traditional knowledge in a parrot-like fashion is not likely to use its influence with the broad masses for the promotion of a modern approach to social and political life.[4]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ A.C. Brown, Jonathan (2014). Misquoting Muhammad: The Challenge and Choices of Interpreting the Prophet's Legacy. Oneworld Publications. p. 3. ISBN 978-1780744209. The ulama (literally, the learned ones) 
  2. ^ a b Glassé, Cyril; Smith, Huston (2001). The New Encyclopedia of Islam. Rowman Altamira. p. 461. Retrieved 9 September 2015. 
  3. ^ a b Böwering, Gerhard; Crone, Patricia (2013). The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought. Princeton University Press. p. 547. Retrieved 9 September 2015. 
  4. ^ a b Hanif̉, N. Islam and Modernity. p. 318. 
  5. ^ At least one author (Sudanese Islamist Hasan al-Turabi) includes those informally trained in religion, insisting that because "all knowledge is divine and religious, a chemist, an engineer, and economist, or a jurist are all ulama." (source: Böwering, Gerhard; Crone, Patricia (2013). The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought. Princeton University Press. p. 547. Retrieved 9 September 2015. )
  6. ^ a b Mehmet, Ipsirli (May 2004). "The Ottoman Ulema (Scholars)" (PDF). muslim heritage. Retrieved 10 September 2015. 
  7. ^ a b Guillaume, Alfred (1954,1956). Islam (2nd (Revised) ed.). Penguin. p. 100.  Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. ^ a b c d Noah Feldman (March 16, 2008). "Why Shariah?". New York Times. Retrieved 2008-10-05. 
  9. ^ Makdisi, George (April–June 1989), "Scholasticism and Humanism in Classical Islam and the Christian West", Journal of the American Oriental Society, 109 (2): 175–182 [175–77], doi:10.2307/604423 
  10. ^ a b Inalcik, Halil. 1973. "Learning, the Medrese, and the Ulemas." In the Ottoman Empire: The Classical Age 1300–1600. New York: Praeger, pp. 167.
  11. ^ Muqadimah Ibn al-Salah, by Ibn al-Salah, edited by 'Aishah bint 'Abd al-Rahman, p. 101, Dar al-Ma'arif, Cairo.
  12. ^ Guillaume, Alfred (1954, 1956). Islam (2nd (Revised) ed.). Penguin. p. 103.  Check date values in: |date= (help)
  13. ^ Narrated by al-Tirmidhi (4:2167), ibn Majah (2:1303), Abu Dawood, and others with slightly different wordings.
  15. ^ Esposito, John. "Ijtihad". The Islamic World: Past and Present. Oxford Islamic Studies Online. Retrieved April 28, 2013. 
  16. ^ Weiss (2002), pp.3,161
  17. ^ Weiss (2002), p.162
  18. ^ Eyyûbî (Mehmet Akkuş, transl.) (1991). Menâkib-i Sultan Süleyman (Risâle-i Pâdisçâh-nâme). Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı. ISBN 978-975-17-0757-4. 
  19. ^ Guy Burak (2015). The second formation of Islamic Law. The Hanafi School in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-09027-9. 
  20. ^ Muṣṭafa b. Fatḫ Allāh al-Ḥamawi (2011). Fawāʿid al-irtiḫāl wa-natā'ij al-safar fi akhbār al-qarn al-ḥādī ʿashar. Beirut: Dār al-Nawadīr. p. 128. , cited after Burak 2015, p. 48
  21. ^ Aḥmad b. Muṣṭafa Taşköprüzade (1975). Al-Shaqāʿiq al-nuʿmāniyya fi ʿulamā' al-dawla al-ʿUthmaniyyā. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabi. p. 5. , cited after Burak, 2015
  22. ^ Guy Burak (2015). The second formation of Islamic Law. The Hanafi School in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 21–64. ISBN 978-1-107-09027-9. 
  23. ^ Inalcik, Halil. 1973. "Learning, the Medrese, and the Ulemas." In the Ottoman Empire: The Classical Age 1300–1600. New York: Praeger, p. 171.
  24. ^ Zilfi, Madeline C. 1986. "The Kadizadelis: Discordant Revivalism in Seventeenth Century Istanbul." Journal of Near Eastern Studies 45 (4): 259.
  25. ^ Hans Georg Majer (1978) (in German), Vorstudien zur Geschichte der İlmiye im Osmanischen Reich, München: Trofenik, pp. 1–28, ISBN 9-783-8782-8125-2 
  26. ^ Madeline C. Zilfi (2006). The Ottoman Ulema. In: Suraiya N. Faroqhi (Ed.): The Cambridge History of Turkey, Vol. 3: The Later Ottoman Empire 1603–1839. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. p. 213. ISBN 978-0-521-62095-6. 
  27. ^ Richard Cooper Repp (1986). The Müfti of Istanbul. A study in the development of the Ottoman learned hierarchy. London: Ithaka Press. ISBN 9-780-8637-2041-3. 
  28. ^ Guy Burak (2015). The second formation of Islamic Law. The Hanafi School in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 47. ISBN 978-1-107-09027-9. 
  29. ^ a b Guy Burak (2015). The second formation of Islamic Law. The Hanafi School in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 65–100. ISBN 978-1-107-09027-9. 
  30. ^ Tijana Krstić (2011). Contested Conversions to Islam: Narratives of Religious Change in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-7785-8. 
  31. ^ Gürzat Kami (2015). Understanding a sixteenth-century ottoman scholar-bureaucrat: Ali b. Bali (1527–1584) and his biographical dictionary Al-ʻIqd al-Manzum fi Dhikr Afazil al-Rum. M.A. Thesis. Istanbul: Graduate school of social sciences, İstanbul Şehir University. pp. 54–55. Retrieved 2017-04-22. 
  32. ^ Gustav Flügel (1865) (in German), [[1] Die arabischen, persischen und türkischen Handschriften der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Hofbibliothek zu Wien. Im Auftrage der Vorgesetzten k.k. Behörde geordnet und beschrieben von Gustav Flügel: Bd. 2], Wien: Druckerei und Verlag der K. K. Hof- und Staatsdruckerei, p. 384, [2]. Retrieved 2017-04-22 
  33. ^ Aşık Çelebi, Abdurrezzak Beretta (Ed.) (2007). Dhayl al-Shaqa’iq al-Nuʻmaniyya fiʻUlama al-Dawla al-ʻUthmaniyya. Kuwait: Dar al-Hidaya. 
  34. ^ Gürzat Kami (2015). Understanding a sixteenth-century ottoman scholar-bureaucrat: Ali b. Bali (1527–1584) and his biographical dictionary Al-ʻIqd al-Manzum fi Dhikr Afazil al-Rum. M.A. Thesis. Istanbul: Graduate school of social sciences, İstanbul Şehir University. p. 62. 
  35. ^ Karen Barkey (2008). Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-71533-1. 
  36. ^ Colin Imber (2006). Government, administration and law. In: Suraiya N. Faroqhi (Ed.): The Cambridge History of Turkey, Vol. 3. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 205–240, see p. 236–238. ISBN 978-0-521-62095-6. 
  37. ^ Willem Floor, Edmund Herzig (2015). Iran and the World in the Safavid Age. I.B.Tauris. p. 20. ISBN 978-1780769905. 
  38. ^ Roger Savory (2007). Iran under the Safavids. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 30. ISBN 978-0521042512. 
  39. ^ a b William L. Cleveland, Martin Bunton (2016). A history of the modern Middle East. New York: Perseus Books Group. pp. 73–75. ISBN 9-780-8133-4980-0. 
  40. ^ William L. Cleveland, Martin Bunton (2016). A history of the modern Middle East. New York: Perseus Books Group. pp. 104–110. ISBN 9-780-8133-4980-0. 
  41. ^ Ghazzal, Zhouhair. Choueiri, Youssef M., ed. A Companion to the History of the Middle East. John Wiley & Sons. p. 81. Retrieved 10 September 2015. 
  42. ^ Hata Sayfasi. "The Constitution of the Republic of Turkey" (PDF). Anayasa.gov.tr. Retrieved 2017-04-23. 
  43. ^ Law Nr. 677 of 30 November 1925 concerning the prohibition and the closure of the dervish convents, monasteries and mausolea, the prohibition of the office of the mausoleum wardens and the awarding and holding of certain titles. T.C. Resmi Gazete Nr 243, 13 December 1925.
  44. ^ Amanat 1992, pp. 163-176.
  45. ^ "CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION". Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol. VI, Fasc. 2. 1992. pp. 163–216. 
  46. ^ Kepel, Gilles (2002). Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam. I.B.Tauris. p. 53. Retrieved 10 September 2015. 
  47. ^ Zouhair, Ghazzal. "The Ulama: Status and Function". A Companion to the History of the Middle East. John Wiley & Sons. p. 85. Retrieved 10 September 2015. 
  48. ^ Zaman, Muhammad Qasim (2007). The Ulama in Contemporary Islam: Custodians of Change. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691130705. Retrieved 10 September 2015. 
  49. ^ Ahmed Rashid (2002). Taliban: Islam, Oil and the New Great Game in Central Asia. I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd. pp. 77, 83, 139. ISBN 1-86064-830-4. 
  50. ^ Jamal Malik (Ed.) (2007). Madrasas in South Asia. Teaching terror?. Routledge. ISBN 9-781-1341-0762-9. 
  51. ^ Tariq Rahman (2004). Denizens of Alien Worlds: A Study of Education, Inequality and Polarization in Pakistan. Oxford University Press. p. Section 5. ISBN 9-780-1959-7863-6. 
  52. ^ David Commins (2009). The Wahhabi Mission and Saudi Arabia. I. B. Tauris. pp. 191–2. ISBN 9-781-8451-1080-2. 
  53. ^ Saïd Amir Arjomand (2010). Islamic resurgence and its aftermath. In: R. Hefner (Ed.): The New Cambridge History of Islam. Vol. 6: Muslims and modernity. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. pp. 191–192. ISBN 978-0-521-84443-7. 
  54. ^ Clement M. Henry (2010). Population, urbanisation and the dialectics of globalisation. In: R. Hefner (Ed.): The New Cambridge History of Islam. Vol. 6: Muslims and modernity. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. pp. 79–86. ISBN 978-0-521-84443-7. 
  55. ^ a b c d Ahmad S. Dallal (2010). The origins and early development of Islamic reform. In: R. Hefner (Ed.): The New Cambridge History of Islam. Vol. 6: Muslims and modernity. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. pp. 107–147. ISBN 978-0-521-84443-7. 
  56. ^ not to be confused with Al-Manar
  57. ^ Merad: Article "Iṣlāḥ. 1. The Arab World" in EI² Vol. IV. p. 144a.
  58. ^ Cairo, Maṭb. al-Manār, 1342/1924
  59. ^ Reinhard Schulze (2016) (in German), Geschichte der Islamischen Welt von 1900 bis zur Gegenwart, München: C. H. Beck, pp. 111–117, ISBN 978-3-406-68855-3 
  60. ^ Suaidi Asyari (2010) (in German), Traditionalist v.s Modernist Islam in Indonesian Politics: Muhammadiyah, Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, ISBN 978-3-639-22993-6 
  61. ^ John Esposito (2013). Oxford Handbook of Islam and Politics. OUP USA. p. 570. Retrieved 24 April 2017. 
  62. ^ Azyumardi Aura, Dina Afrianty, Robert W. Hefner (2007). Pesantren and madrasa: Muslim schools and national ideale in Indonesia. In: Robert W. Hefner, Muhammad Qasim Zaman (Ed.): Schooling Islam: The culture and politics of modern Muslim education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-12933-4. 
  63. ^ Barbara Daly Metcalf (1982). Islamic revival in British India: Deoband, 1860–1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9-780-1956-6049-4. 
  64. ^ Barbara D. Metcalf (2002). "Traditionalist" Islamic activism: Deoband, tablighis, and talibs. In: Craig Calhoun, Paul Price, Ashley Timmer (Ed.): Understanding September 11. New York: The New Press. pp. 53–66, see p. 55. ISBN 978-1-56584-774-3. 
  65. ^ Ashraf ʻAlī Thānvī, Barbara Daly Metcalf (1992). Perfecting Women: Maulana Ashraf 'Ali Thanawi's Bihishti Zewar. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-08093-5. 
  66. ^ Barbara Daly Metcalf (1982). Islamic revival in British India: Deoband, 1860–1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 264–296. ISBN 9-780-1956-6049-4. 
  67. ^ Bernard Haykel (2003). Revival and reform in Islam: The legacy of Muhammad al-Shawkānī. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9-780-5215-2890-0. 
  68. ^ George N. Makdisi (1981). pdf The rise of colleges: Institutions of learning in Islam and the West Check |url= value (help). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press. p. 140. ISBN 978-0-85224-375-6. Retrieved 24 April 2017. 
  69. ^ Bunglawala, Inayat (March 2011). "Islam must engage with science, not deny it". The Guardian. 


Further reading[edit]

  • Bein, Amit. Ottoman Ulema, Turkish Republic: Agents of Change and Guardians of Tradition (2011) Amazon.com
  • Hatina, Meir. Ulama, Politics, and the Public Sphere: An Egyptian Perspective (2010). ISBN 978-1-60781-032-2
  • Heyd. Uriel. "Some Aspects of The Ottoman Fetva." School of Oriental and African Studies Bulletin; 32 (1969), p. 35–56.
  • Inalcik, Halil. 1973. "Learning, the Medrese, and the Ulema." In The Ottoman Empire: The Classical Age 1300–1600. New York: Praeger, pp. 165–178.
  • Mehmet, Ipsirli, Guidelines to the Jurisprudence of Ottoman Ulema
  • Rabithah Ma'ahid Islamiyah Biografi Ulama of Indonesia
  • Tasar, Murat. "The Ottoman Ulema: their understanding of knowledge and scholarly contribution." The Turks. 3: Ottomans. Editors: Hasan Celâl Güzel, C.Cem Oğuz, Osman Karatay. Ankara: Yeni Türkiye, 2002, pp. 841–850.
  • Zilfi, Madeline C. 1986. "The Kadizadelis: Discordant Revivalism in Seventeenth Century Istanbul." Journal of Near Eastern Studies 45 (4): 251–269.