User talk:Mamman AA

Danchuwa- Bula Ward moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Danchuwa- Bula Ward. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Losipov (talk) 19:29, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Losipov thank you for your concern Mamman AA (talk) 16:35, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rabi'at Dahiru Nyako

The article Rabi'at Dahiru Nyako has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability found. The book exists, but hasn't received any attention as far as I could tell. (the two "references" given are more notable, older references about the same subject, not about this book or author). If there are Nigerian (or other) reliable sources about her, then please add them to the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fram thank you Mamman AA (talk) 08:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rabi'at Dahiru Nyako (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mamman AA/Rabi'at Dahiru Nyako and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mamman AA! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:11, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rabi'at Dahiru Nyako

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rabi'at Dahiru Nyako requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 07:34, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel thank you for your concern Mamman AA (talk) 07:36, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rabia'at Dahiru Nyako

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rabia'at Dahiru Nyako requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 14:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rabi'at Dahiru Nyako

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rabi'at Dahiru Nyako requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 14:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonathan Deamer thank you Mr Jonathan i will try to improve my edit, thank you for your concern Mamman AA (talk) 14:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 thank you Mamman AA (talk) 15:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23 {{ unblock Mamman AA disruptive edit }} Mamman AA (talk) 11:11, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23

{{Unblock=Hello everyone. I have now realised my mistakes and promise not to recreate the page anymore nor continuous creation of pages with doubtful notability.

Henceforth, in order to create any article, I’ll the Article for Creation procedure where my articles will be vetted before mainspace as I have now taken my time to read some policies of guiding this encyclopaedia. Mamman AA (talk) 07:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

@Bbb23

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mamman AA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please restore my account because I'm not understanding this article is to reputableMamman AA (talk) 15:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 16:05, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Bbb23 rhank you so much I accept the reason for blocking my account = my reason is I don't know how to access this tools- Mamman AA (talk) 15:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)}} Mamman AA (talk) 15:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mamman AA (talk) 15:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mamman AA, you may have only one unblock request open at a time. Please stop pinging me.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Bbb23 please help me i am on edit platform Mamman AA (talk) 15:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mamman AA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i made a mistake for creating an article with different categories and spelling due to lack of understanding the policy of Wikipedia under create article thank you i apologize you Mamman AA (talk) 10:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC) i made a mistake for creating an article with different categories and spelling due to lack of understanding the policy of Wikipedia under create article thank you i apologize you Mamman AA (talk) 10:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't describe what edits you intend to make instead. I would submit that perhaps you aren't yet ready to create new articles. 331dot (talk) 17:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mamman AA, do not e-mail me again.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Danchuwa- Bula Ward

Hello, Mamman AA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Danchuwa- Bula Ward, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mamman AA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello everyone. I have now realised my mistakes and promise not to recreate the page anymore nor continuous creation of pages with doubtful notability. Henceforth, in order to create any article, I’ll the Article for Creation procedure where my articles will be vetted before mainspace as I have now taken my time to read some policies of guiding this encyclopaedia. Mamman AA (talk) 20:46, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm afraid this is just part of the problem, per Bbb23 below. It's superficial and inadequate. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Bbb23: Looks weak, but I'll ask. Unblock?-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: Weak's a good word. This user is not an asset to the project, not just for the reason they mention. Despite only about 100 edits, they have repeatedly violated WP:OLINK, but, worse, they do so with false edit summaries, e.g., this edit - what do their changes have to do with fixing grammar? --Bbb23 (talk) 14:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ach,so! Danke -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mamman AA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello everyone. I have now realised my mistakes and promise not to recreate the page anymore nor continuous creation of pages with doubtful notability. Henceforth, in order to create any article, I’ll the Article for Creation procedure where my articles will be vetted before mainspace as I have now taken my time to read some policies of guiding this encyclopaedia. Mamman AA (talk) 1:19 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read the WP:GAB -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is an exact repeat of your last unblock request, which was declined. I have revoked Talk page access.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

😢 -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mamman AA: Got your email. Unfortunately, it is little different from the last two declined unblock requests. As Bbb23 notes, it does not address all of the problems. Please see his comments after penultimate request. Best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Danchuwa- Bula Ward

Hello, Mamman AA. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Danchuwa- Bula Ward".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Mamman AA/Rabi'at Dahiru Nyako

Hello, Mamman AA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Mamman AA/Rabi'at Dahiru Nyako, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to request for unblock

@Mamman AA you have not answered the questions asked by the administrators. Also, you should know why you are blocked before sending a request. You might need to read through the link shared earlier as you violated WP:OLINK

I will forward them here, so you can go through them again.

Wikipedia :GAB To Appeal
WP:OLINK To understand what you did wrong

If you need help on how to contribute to English Wikipedia, Don't hesitate to ping me! Tesleemah (talk) 03:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]