User talk:Maria Grimana

This is Maria Grimana's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

What establishes notability is either museum collections or major art reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Maria Grimana/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 00:23, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More here.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

changes by vshimpaze

hello, I am sorry but I don't understand what you changed, can you please explain me what you changed?, thank you in advance for your reply

Click on the link in the above reply and read what Aspro said.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:43, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry but I still don't understand. I see names of other users in the links but not mine, can you please me explain? what link? what changes did you make? thank you for your patience

Click here.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:40, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hello, I do apologize, but i cannot see your changes, where should i look? can you please help me in this step, i cannot find your changes wherever i look, where do i look for your changes? please!

I really don't understand what you are asking.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:13, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

it says that yesterday you made 3 changes, but i don't know where i have to look to see them same thing a few days before

Show me where it says I made changes. If you click on "Contributions" you can see all my changes. Some of them are to your talk page and you will see your name. Click on "diff" to the left of your name.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:48, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to make you waste time. yes I was there before and could not understand, and still can't, the page that comes out doesn't say anything i can figure out. if i could send a screen shot of what i see.... i see that in other cases you give an answer and explain what you did or think (such as the last inauguration events), in my case it just shows a link and "click", i copied and pasted but it's just help desk archive with anything from you

Okay, what I did there was show you that someone answered your question. I wasn't there. Sometimes people who answer questions let you know.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:24, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

got it! thank you!

AfC notification: Draft:Maurizio Pellegrin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maurizio Pellegrin. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Robert, thank you for your comment.

I have removed a few (about 20 sources), do you think the article looks better now? Thank you!!!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maurizio Pellegrin (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

Although there has been a degree of improvement since the last review more improvements in the same vein are needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maurizio Pellegrin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 19:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Maria Grimana, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 19:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

dr strauss, thank you for taking the time to check my draft, I made some changes, I took away unimportant citations and added articles and writings of critics, i spread the quotations through the text, do you think it can be published now? what is my next step? resubmit my draft and get again at the end of the long line or I can hold my position? Thank you! Maria GrimanaMaria Grimana (talk) 23:21, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Maurizio Pellegrin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maurizio Pellegrin. Thanks! NewYorkActuary (talk) 13:55, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have revised my draft

Hello,

thank you to all the reviewers that spent time helping me to improve my article.

I have tried to follow all your advices, I hope I have understood what you said and that my changes are useful (I left only important references, I made it all in prose (no more lists), I left only the bibliography (that I shortened) as a list as I saw in other articles, I didn't mention anything that cannot be sourced.

Can you please tell me if you think that, as it is, my article can pass? or what else should I do?

I am not able to address specifically to anyone who I contacted before (sorry, navigation in wikipedia it not easy for me)

Thank you!

All the best,

maria grimanaMaria Grimana (talk) 02:43, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maurizio Pellegrin (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

The draft has had improvements however there is still more work to be done. Please see this as well as it indicates some possible plagiarism within this draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maurizio Pellegrin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:52, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Maurizio Pellegrin has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maurizio Pellegrin. Thanks! Yashovardhan (talk) 13:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maurizio Pellegrin has been accepted

Maurizio Pellegrin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TheSandDoctor (talk) 14:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you TheSandDoctor !

I appreciate your help and the help of all the others.

Soon I will start working to improve my article..and maybe I will make it to a B.

I am proud to have contributed to Wikipedia.

All the best,

Maria GrimanaMaria Grimana (talk) 14:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Maria Grimana. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Maria Grimana. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Maurizio Pellegrin, Siena, Italy, 2016.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Maurizio Pellegrin, Siena, Italy, 2016.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:43, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]