User talk:Masageee33

Welcome!

Hello, Masageee33, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 20:49, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Anthony Kennedy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 11:41, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mitt Romney

added a link pointing to BA

Pete Ricketts

added a link pointing to BA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox edits

Hi, Masageee33. Is there a reason why you are adding information about degrees and fields of study in the |Alma Mater= field, instead of the appropriate field for that information: |Education=? Regards, Xenophrenic (talk) 21:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason you're still doing this without discussion? Acroterion (talk) 00:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Linguist111. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Donald Trump without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Linguist Please respond on the current page. Except on my talk, please ping me by typing {{SUBST:ping|Linguist111}}) 22:04, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 03:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since you continue to add degree material to infoboxes against consensus, and after you've been told how to do it properly, I've blocked you for disruptive editing. Please take other users' views seriously, don't just wait a couple of days and do it again. If this continues you'll be blocked for edit-warring too. Acroterion (talk) 03:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 21:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should stop now, Masageee33. Xenophrenic (talk) 06:13, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 10:35, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas Perez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MPP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Masageee33 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Where is the ANI discussing this block? It appears this person is reversing disruptive removal of degrees earned by another editor. Their only !crime is not switching the field name to "education", which any other editor could have done. Instead the other editors have been removing all the degrees earned information. I find that to be the disruptive editing. It is also disruptive to Wikidata which gets its information from these fields.

Decline reason:

Firstly, this is not an unblock request but a rant. Secondly, we do not accept requests by proxy. Thirdly, the block expired about a week ago. Fourthly, if you think there should be an ANI thread discussing this block, you are welcome to start one. Huon (talk) 01:27, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:15, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Masageee33. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]