User talk:Mcgerveyj03

August 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Stipe Miocic have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Stipe Miocic was changed by Mcgerveyj03 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95244 on 2021-08-08T14:42:10+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:42, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mcgerveyj03, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mcgerveyj03! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Baker Mayfield seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 22:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Stipe Miocic, you may be blocked from editing. Cassiopeia talk 03:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused who did I attack Mcgerveyj03 (talk) 02:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mcgreryjo3. It is not neutral point of view as the info is unsouced. For such content added, significant coverage by indpendent, reliabl sources need to be added to verified and support the the claim. By the way, you need to ping the editor who you send message to so they could receive a notification. Cassiopeia talk 03:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to LeBron James. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 09:55, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bernie Kosar, you may be blocked from editing. TJRC (talk) 23:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Bronny James, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically per MOS:BIRTHPLACE, one's birthplace is generally not included in the lead. —Bagumba (talk) 01:57, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hi Mcgerveyj03! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Jake Paul that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. – ².O.^Boxing 20:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jake Paul. TylerBurden (talk) 21:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rick Chiricosta

The article Rick Chiricosta has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. interstatefive (talk) - just another roadgeek 00:06, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]