User talk:Meghabavisi

Image tagging for File:Anushka Sharma.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Anushka Sharma.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

This is your only warning; if you add an inappropriate image to Wikipedia again, as you did at Anushka Sharma, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Krimuk|90 (talk) 14:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Anushka Sharma.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Anushka Sharma.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —SpacemanSpiff 20:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Meghabavisi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Shamir Tandon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 12:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 12:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

re Neetu Chandra

Text such as:

"Neetu Chandra is an Indian who is perceived as a global actor, producer and theatre artist."

which you wrote, is not particularly encyclopaedic. I suggest you get more editing experience before making such large edits as this, where you created that text. You also removed information 'fields' from the infobox (such as |spouse= ) that will likely be needed in future. Please refrain from doing this until you are more expreienced.Regards, 220 of ^Borg

Proposed deletion of Shamir Tandon

The article Shamir Tandon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. noq (talk) 13:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Anushka.Sharma.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Anushka.Sharma.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Biwom (talk) 13:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gaurav Pandey.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Gaurav Pandey.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

There's a mismatch between the claimed authorship and the copyright in the metadata. Another image, under the same title c:File:Gaurav Pandey.jpg, with the same copyright issue, was deleted three times on commons resulting in a week's block for c:User:Gaurav Pandey1009

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gaurav Pandey

Meghabavisi, please explain what's happening here. c:User:Gaurav Pandey1009 uploaded his promo shot on commons which was deleted three times with a mismatch between the claimed authorship in the description and the copyright info in the file's metadata. As soon as he gets blocked for a week for this behaviour, you step in with another file on this wiki, File:Gaurav Pandey.jpg, which has the same mismatch in authorship. What's going on? At the moment it smacks of sockpuppetry. Caution follows... Cabayi (talk) 15:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, Meghabavisi, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Gaurav Pandey1009 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 15:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gaurav Pandey

Hello, Meghabavisi. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Gaurav Pandey, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 14:39, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gaurav Pandey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaurav Pandey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Pandey (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ubiquity (talk) 20:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gaurav Pandey

Hi there, re: your edits a few months ago at Gaurav Pandey, the tone of the content you submitted is inappropriate for an encyclopedia and comes off as highly promotional. We're not here to write loving puff-pieces for article subjects. I've detailed the specific problems at Talk:Gaurav Pandey if you're curious about what specifically was wrong, but puffery, subjective details, attempts to get inside the subject's mind, lack of sourcing, were some of the main issues. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]