User talk:Mithiran02

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kalathur Kannamma has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Gail (talk) 15:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Redirected article

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for creating the article, Hotel Trubble. However, there already is an article on that topic, Hotel Trubble (BBC1), so your article was redirected to the existing one. Please take advantage of the search feature to find similar-named articles before creating them in the future—and feel free to redirect alternate spellings of existing articles. Thanks. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 12:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Jill Murphy

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Teapotgeorge^Talk 14:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sophie McKenzie, you will be blocked from editing. Grika Ⓣ 18:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Sophie McKenzie, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Aervanath (talk) 18:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sophie McKenzie

A tag has been placed on Sophie McKenzie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Bongomatic 05:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Holly Bodimeade

A tag has been placed on Holly Bodimeade requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Bongomatic 21:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Chloe Tempest-Jones

A tag has been placed on Chloe Tempest-Jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. CultureDrone (talk) 08:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Zoe Tempest-Jones

A tag has been placed on Zoe Tempest-Jones requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. CultureDrone (talk) 08:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pax Baldwin

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pax Baldwin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 13:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Notability of Halaifonua Finau

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Halaifonua Finau, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Halaifonua Finau seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Halaifonua Finau, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Starring Tracy Beaker. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. -- Mentifisto 16:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Future Planning, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. FlyingToaster 19:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ann Beach

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ann Beach, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ann Beach. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Esasus (talk) 23:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Olivia Grant (British child actress)

I have nominated Olivia Grant (British child actress), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Grant (British child actress). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bongomatic 18:52, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Olivia Grant (British child actress)

I have nominated Olivia Grant (British child actress), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia Grant (British child actress) (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Bongomatic 18:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Removal of AFD templates

I have closed the AFD on Olivia Grant (1994 British actress) as keep but when I went to remove the AFD tag from the page I saw that you had already done so. Please do not do this in the future. Not only will it not stop the discussion from taking place, it might ironically make it more likely that the article will be deleted. There are a few who will !vote "delete" for no other reason then the creator removing deletion tags. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Alesha Dixon

Please do not add non-free images to the biographies of living people. Non-free images have to be irreplaceable, per the non-free content criteria, and someone could easily create a free image of almost any living person. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 13:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

The article Holly Bodimeade has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Holly Bodimeade, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Listing her appearances in school productions isn't helping your case any. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Mum Minder

A tag has been placed on The Mum Minder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Scientus (talk) 22:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Last warning for non-free content

You have been warned before. Please stop adding non-free images to biographies of living people, and review our non-free content guidelines, specifically our non-free content criteria. If you continue to damage Wikipedia by abusing non-free content, you will be blocked from editing. J Milburn (talk) 18:16, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Sharmila Tagore

Please do no re-add the copyright image to the article Sharmila Tagore without ensuring that it meets our guidelines for the use of copyright material. -- The Red Pen of Doom 17:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Tiffany Jo Allen. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Jdrewitt (talk) 17:32, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Tiffany Jo Allen

A tag has been placed on Tiffany Jo Allen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G4 - recreation of deleted article - subject still has no third party coverage

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- The Red Pen of Doom 11:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Jack Tweed

Just to let you know, I have reverted the change you made to Tweed's article as it was undiscussed and nothing had changed since the last recreation. The article again redirects to Jade Goody's article. Please don't take this as a criticism, if you feel strongly about having the article, please discuss it first. Best wishes. Sky83 (talk) 20:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Alesha Dixon. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 18:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

You were warned numerous times, but you chose to ignore those warnings and our non-free content criteria in continuing to add non-free images to Alesha Dixon, so I have blocked your account indefinitely. If you wish to appeal the block, you can use {{unblock}} the unblock template. J Milburn (talk) 23:19, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Beaker's Back

A tag has been placed on Beaker's Back requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. OlYeller^Talktome 19:21, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Cat Mummy

The article The Cat Mummy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tgeairn (talk) 04:52, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Klariza Clayton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Klariza Clayton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klariza Clayton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 21:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Starring Tracy Beaker

The article Starring Tracy Beaker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable book that fails WP:NBOOK.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib (talk) 19:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC)