Jump to content

User talk:Mrs McCoy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Mrs McCoy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 12:42, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mrs McCoy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Mrs McCoy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wia /tlk 00:45, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photos on MLC School

[edit]

Hello, Mrs McCoy. Recently, you uploaded a number of photographs for use on MLC School. You claimed that these photographs are your own original work, despite some of them being over 120 years old. I am doing my best to follow Wikipedia's guideline of assuming good faith, but I struggle to accept that you personally took photos from the 1800s. I have not put together a complete list, but some examples are:

  • 1886-Rev-Charles-Prescott.jpg
  • Miss Lester circa 1880.jpg
  • COOK nee SHEPPARD Elsie.jpg
  • Syd and Elsie Cook during their time serving in World War One.jpg

Wikipedia takes matters of copyright very seriously, so unless you can provide some explanation of how you managed to take these pictures, I will have to request their removal. Gronk Oz (talk) 13:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Gronk Oz

Sorry, have yet to attach sources to all images, but below is the reason I uploaded these images. Is there another way other than the method I used? I apologise, I am new to this and did not intend to mislead anyone.


These images are of Australian origin and are now in the public domain because its term of copyright has expired. According to the Australian Copyright Council (ACC), ACC Information Sheet G023v17 (Duration of copyright) (August 2014).

 A Photographs or other works published anonymously, under a pseudonym or the creator is unknown: Copyright has expired if taken or published prior to 1 January 1955
 B Photographs (except A): Copyright has expired if taken prior to 1 January 1955
 C Artistic works (except A & B): Copyright has expired if the creator died before 1 January 1955
 D Published editions* (except A & B): Copyright has expired if first published more than 25 years ago
 E Commonwealth or State government owned** photographs and engravings: Copyright has expired if taken or published more than 50 years ago and prior to 1 May 1969
* means the typographical arrangement and layout of a published work. eg. newsprint.
** owned means where a government is the copyright owner as well as would have owned copyright but reached some other agreement with the creator.

Mrs McCoy (talk) 23:35, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The bottom line is that you should never, ever, ever claim that a photo is your "own work" unless you actually took the photo yourself. The licensing at Commons needs to be changed by editing the image information pages there. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to the good folks at the Teahouse (including Cullen, above), we figured out how to sort these out. I know it might sound like a hassle, but it is better than having the files deleted. The process is to open each image in Wikimedia Commons (I will assume you know how to do that since you uploaded them there: let me know if you need a hand). Looking at the image's description page, make the following corrections:
  1. Edit the “Summary” section as follows:
    1. Change the source from {{own}} to be the actual source of the photo (if unknown, say {{unknown|source}} ).
    2. Change the author from [[User:Mrs McCoy|Mrs McCoy]] to the actual photographer (if unknown, say {{unknown|author}} ).
  2. Edit the “Licensing” section to change the licence from {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} to {{PD-Australia}}.
I hope that helps; please get back to me if you need a hand.--Gronk Oz (talk) 06:49, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you so much for this information Gronk Oz, incredibly helpful.

I am not certain how to enter Wikimedia Commons, but I will give it a try. (I uploaded the images by clicking the image icon.)

At the moment I am on a 2 week Xmas break. I will tend to this first thing on my return from holidays on 6 Jan.

Happy holidays and best wishes for 2016.

Mrs McCoy (talk) 08:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mrs McCoy. I trust your break is enjoyable and refreshing. Once you're ready to get back to it, the easiest way to get to the Wikimedia Commons entry for a given photo is as follows (I use a Windows PC; if your configuration is different then some of the details may be slightly different):
  • Start from the MLC School page, and click on an image (point your cursor at the middle of the picture and click). This opens a full-page version of that image.
  • Towards the lower right corner, you will see a glue logo with the text "More details" - click it.
  • This should take you to the "Wikimedia Commons" page where the image is stored; you can confirm this at the top left of the page. There should be an "Edit" tab near the top that will allow you to make the changes above.
Again, let me know if there is anything else I can help with.
Once we get the photos sorted out, I would like to move on to address a couple of other issues with the article - but first things first, let's get those images safe. The "public domain" licence should apply for any Australian photo taken before 1966 (i.e. more than fifty years ago). Other photos will still be under copyright, and will need further discussion.--Gronk Oz (talk) 12:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gronk Oz

I hope your Xmas break was relaxed and enjoyable.

I have made the changes the the photos on the MLC School site as per your helpful suggestions. There are a couple I would like you to have a look at; specifically the Burwood Memorial Arch photo and the Max Dupain 'Violinist' photo. Can you check that I've done these right.

You mention that there are some other issues with the article. Can you let me know what needs addressing and I'll get right to it.

I am an ex-student of the School and I wanted to upload the archival information and photography I hold from my many years of association with the School so that other people can have access to it. (My niece gave me a quick wikipedia tutorial, but as you have no doubt guessed, I am a newbie and am grateful for all the advice I can get.)

Thank you again for all your assistance and patience. I couldn't have done it without you.

Warm regards Mrs McCoy (talk) 06:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Interested parties should visit Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mrs McCoy to sort the licencing issue out. Fiddle Faddle 13:09, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Fiddle Faddle 12:41, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Miss Lester circa 1880.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Miss Lester circa 1880.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]