User talk:Murgh Krahi

Welcome!

Hello, Murgh Krahi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! HINDWIKI • CHAT 11:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Murgh Krahi, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! HINDWIKI • CHAT 11:52, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Alphamay

Hello. Thank you for creating articles for Wikipedia.

An article you recently created, Alphamay, is orphaned, that means no other articles link to it. Although it can still be found by searching Wikipedia, it is preferable that it can be reachable by links from related pages. Therefore, it is helpful to add links form other suitable pages with similar or related information. You may use the find link tool to do so.

I've tagged the article in question with {{orphan}}. If you have added a category to it, you may remove the tag. If you have any questions, you may ask on my talk page, at the Teahouse or help desk. Happy editing! —AE (talk • contributions) 13:16, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Famoe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Famoe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TomStar81 (Talk) 13:58, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. You copied the contents of Draft:David Baev to David Baev. This is known as a copy-paste move, and requires attribution. Please don't do this again. It creates extra work. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:50, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Draft:Rasullabad into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Atsushi Hisatsumi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atsushi Hisatsumi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atsushi Hisatsumi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 19:03, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Murgh Krahi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Atsushi Hisatsumi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 19:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 19:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dennis Cartier

Hello, Murgh Krahi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dennis Cartier".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jimi Kendrix concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jimi Kendrix, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sunil V. Deodhar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunil V. Deodhar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunil V. Deodhar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBig Xrayᗙ 16:10, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop converting pages!

Hello user! Please stop this page removing activities without having any page remover or page reviewers, you have been warned for stop this inane activities otherwise you will be banned from wikipedia. tuxr 16:31, 16 March 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuxr (talk • contribs)

Moving pages is allowed per policies. Murgh Krahi (talk) 18:56, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alphamay

The article Alphamay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable band who lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources and fails WP:BAND and WP:NMUSIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS ^💬 16:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Catalina la Grande

The article Catalina la Grande has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a hoax. A Google News search yield mere three hits and they are all about different topics.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS ^💬 03:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshmi Devy

Hey User:GSS. Can you please look into this account's edits? You have already deleted a few and he is continuously spamming and seems a possible perfect UPE. 84.210.77.37 (talk) 21:08, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:MER-C, User:Vanjagenije He is from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thisisfamoe19877/Archive. If you will do a CU check, there will be atleast 100 accounts. 84.210.77.37 (talk) 21:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear admins, MER-C, Vanjagenije, GSS. I created this page out of my own interests and no one paid me for it. i think this person has personal problem with the actress and attacked my page from 3 ip addresses. The actress played significant role in notable films so she is notable as per policies. Regards Murgh Krahi (talk) 07:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:MER-C, User:Vanjagenije, let me know I can submit the proof that he is a paid editor from Famoe group? 213.128.189.149 (talk) 14:23, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

213.128.189.149, You appear to have a lot of knowledge of wiki-rules and defiantly not a newcomer so, I would first like to know what account(s) you have used in the past or currently using. Also, are you using a VPN or proxy software? GSS ^💬 15:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nandita Mahtani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nandita Mahtani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nandita Mahtani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~AntanO4task (talk) 10:17, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dennis Cartier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dennis Cartier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Cartier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:34, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nandita Mahtani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nandita Mahtani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nandita Mahtani (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

KnightMight (talk) 13:24, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SUPERGTOR, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

MrOllie (talk) 19:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:SUPERGTOR per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SUPERGTOR. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- TNT (talk • she/they) 04:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]